The subject matter of this dispute is the claim of a discharged service member to recover from a military unit average earnings for the entire period of delay in the final settlement upon discharge for the period from June 15, 2017, to December 23, 2023.
**** In its decision, the Supreme Court referred to the key…
The subject matter of this dispute is the recovery from a military unit, in favor of a discharged serviceman, of average earnings for the period of delay in settlement upon discharge for the period from 2017 to 2023, as well as compensation for the loss of part of income due to the untimely payment of…
The subject matter of this dispute is the recovery in favor of a former prosecutor of underpaid salary for the period from March to September 2020, which the employer calculated on the basis of a government resolution rather than in accordance with the special law on the prosecution service.
**** In this case, the Supreme Court…
The subject matter of this dispute is the claim of a former serviceman for the recovery of average financial allowance from a military unit for untimely settlement upon discharge.
Regarding the arguments relied upon by the court, the situation is as follows. Firstly, the court noted that since July 2022, a new wording of Article 117…
The subject matter of this dispute is the claims of a serviceman seconded to the State Enterprise "Ukraerorukh" to declare the enterprise's omission unlawful and to oblige it to calculate and pay an additional monetary reward in the amount of UAH 30,000 monthly in accordance with Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No.…
### 1. Essence of the Act
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1189 establishes a consolidated and updated legal framework governing the entry into the European Union of animals and animal products from third countries, specifically regarding compliance with EU restrictions on veterinary antimicrobial use. The act ensures that imported food products of animal origin do not originate…
This judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of *Seksimp Group SRL v. the Republic of Moldova* (Just Satisfaction) represents a crucial determination of financial redress following a complex property dispute. The case stems from a domestic litigation where Moldovan courts, without adequate reasoning, ordered the applicant company to pay…
### Essence of the Decision
This judgment determines the just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant company, Seksimp Group SRL, following a principal judgment that found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 by the Republic of Moldova. The case originated from domestic court orders requiring the applicant to…
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Brun v. Switzerland*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that there was no violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken in conjunction with Article 4 (prohibition of forced labour) of the Convention. The applicant, a Swiss man declared medically unfit for military…
The subject matter of this dispute is a claim to declare unlawful and set aside the Decree of the President of Ukraine in the part concerning the enactment of the decision of the National Security and Defense Council on the application of personal five-year sanctions to the plaintiff.
****: In this decision, the Grand Chamber of…
The subject matter of this dispute is the lawfulness of the conviction of the head of an enterprise for failure to comply with and obstructing the enforcement of a court decision on the recovery of wage arrears, as well as determining the correct procedural order for releasing a person from punishment due to the expiration…
Here's a breakdown of the Letucha v. Ukraine decision:
**Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to the denial of access to a court of appeal for the applicant, Ms. Letucha.…
Here's a breakdown of the Fomichov and Aland Group, TOV v. Ukraine decision:
1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which guarantees the right to a fair…
Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of Buzyna v. Ukraine:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The case concerns the ineffective investigation into the murder of Oles Buzyna, a journalist with pro-Russian views, in Kyiv in 2015. The Court found a violation of Article 2…
Here's a breakdown of the Avramych v. Ukraine decision:
**1. Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3(b) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the right to a fair trial. The case…
Here's a breakdown of the Kovalenko v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights:
**1. Essence of the Decision:**
In the case of Kovalenko v. Ukraine, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental…
Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of V.I. v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The case concerned a Moldovan and Ukrainian national who complained that confidential medical information about his mental health was disclosed in his military service…
Here's a breakdown of the Lena Hakobyan and Others v. Armenia decision:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Armenia in violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) due to the excessive length of civil and administrative proceedings, which…
Okay, here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of Usatyuk v. Ukraine.
**1. Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to the excessive length…
Here's a breakdown of the Shaykin and Others v. Ukraine decision:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to inadequate conditions of detention in the…