Greetings. As a specialist with 15 years of experience, I have analyzed the Supreme Court decision you provided. Here is a detailed breakdown:
1. **Subject of the Dispute:** The case concerns the legality of applying a zero-rate tax on repatriation (dividends) when paying income to a non-resident investor from the Netherlands, and the legality of ordering…
1. **Subject of the Dispute:** Recovery of a penalty and a fine from a contractor for the breach of deadlines for the completion of individual stages of construction works under a construction contract.
2. **Court's Arguments:**
- The Supreme Court emphasized that the key criterion for accruing punitive sanctions is the content of the…
1. The subject of the dispute is the legality of recognizing a natural person's tax debt as bad and writing it off within the framework of debt restructuring proceedings pursuant to Part 2 of Article 125 of the Code of Ukraine on Bankruptcy Procedures (CUBP).
2. The Supreme Court in this case relies on the legal…
Greetings. As a lawyer with many years of experience, I have analyzed the court decision you provided. Here is a detailed analysis:
1. **Subject matter of the dispute:** Declaration of invalidity of an addendum to a procurement contract for generators and recovery of overpaid budget funds in the amount of UAH 5.27 million.
2. **Court's arguments:**
* The…
Greetings. As a lawyer with many years of experience, I have analyzed the Supreme Court decision you provided. Here is a detailed breakdown of the case:
1. **Subject of the Dispute:** A cassation appeal filed by the defense counsel against the judgment of the court of first instance and the ruling of the appellate court regarding…
The case of *A.A. v. the Netherlands* (application no. 7481/23) concerns the refusal of Dutch authorities to grant family reunification to five minor children born of the applicant’s second and third polygamous marriages. The applicant, a Yemeni national granted asylum in the Netherlands, sought to bring these children from Türkiye, where they resided with their…
Greetings. As a lawyer with many years of experience, I have analyzed the court decision you provided. Here is a detailed breakdown:
1. **Subject matter of the dispute:** Declaration of invalidity of a real estate sale and purchase agreement concluded between a debtor and a third party as a "fraudulent transaction" (a transaction made to the…
1. The subject of the dispute is the cassation review of the judgment of the court of first instance and the ruling of the appellate court in criminal proceedings regarding the charges against a person under Part 1 of Article 286-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (violation of traffic safety rules while in a…
1. **Subject of the dispute:** A lawsuit filed by a mother against the deceased’s wife to remove obstacles to the burial by obliging the defendant to bury the urn with ashes at a cemetery (columbarium) according to Christian rites, given that the defendant has been keeping the ashes at home for an extended period.
2. **Court…
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1092 establishes a harmonized EU code of conduct for "issuer-sponsored research," which is investment research paid for by the company being analyzed. The act aims to restore trust in such research—particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)—by mandating strict independence, transparency, and conflict-of-interest management. It ensures that investors can clearly distinguish…
****
**1. Essence of the Decision**
The case of *Sytnyk v. Ukraine* concerns the prolonged inability of a property owner to evict previous owners from a flat he purchased at a public auction following a mortgage foreclosure. Despite the applicant holding a valid title, the Ukrainian Supreme Court denied his eviction claim, citing Article 109 of the…
The judgment in *Spyridonidis v. Armenia* (application no. 35845/24) addresses the delicate intersection between international child abduction proceedings and the right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case involved a Greek national seeking the return of his two children from Armenia to Greece under the Hague Convention,…
The case of *New Generation Humanitarian NGO v. Armenia* (application no. 5837/17) concerns a dispute over access to the Court of Cassation following a failed defamation claim against a media outlet. The applicant NGO, which advocates for LGBT rights, sought redress for a series of articles it characterized as hate speech, but its appeal was…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The case of *Nekrasova v. Ukraine* concerns the right of access to a court for an individual serving a prison sentence who was denied the ability to appeal her civil case to the Supreme Court due to an inability to pay court fees. While the applicant was a prisoner with…
This judgment concerns the criminal conviction of four individuals who participated in a 2011 protest outside the Parliament of Catalonia, where they were accused of obstructing members of parliament (MPs) from attending a budget session. The applicants were initially acquitted by the *Audiencia Nacional*, which found their actions to be a protected exercise of the…
This judgment, **** for the protection of human rights in Ukraine, concerns the case of Mr. Fedor Belous, a life prisoner with a second-degree disability who is reliant on a wheelchair. The applicant alleged that his detention in Zhytomyr Prison no. 8 was inhumane due to a lack of facilities adapted for his disability, which…
The case of *B.C. v. Italy* (application no. 42909/23) concerns the arbitrary detention of an unaccompanied minor in a reception centre that lacked a clear legal basis for such deprivation of liberty. The applicant, an Ivoirian national, was placed in the "C.A.R.A." of Restinco, a facility that functioned as a de facto detention centre where…
This judgment concerns the failure of Armenian authorities to enforce a court-ordered interim measure granting grandparents contact rights with their grandson. The applicants, Russian nationals, sought to visit the child after his mother relocated to Armenia without the father’s consent. Despite a clear judicial order for visitation, the child’s mother repeatedly obstructed these meetings, and…
This analysis concerns the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in *A.S. v. Latvia* (Application no. 9327/23), delivered on 3 September 2026.
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The case centers on whether Latvia fulfilled its positive obligations under Article 4 of the Convention (prohibition of slavery, servitude, and forced or compulsory labour) regarding…
Here is a detailed analysis of the court decision, prepared for you:
1. **Subject of the dispute:** The plaintiff challenged the decision of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to refuse the payment of a one-time monetary assistance in the amount of UAH 15,000,000 in connection with the death of her husband, a serviceman, insisting on…