Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

CASE OF TINYK-ZHUK v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the Tinyk-Zhuk v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights found Ukraine in violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to an ineffective investigation into the…

CASE OF STROGUSH AND KROPACHEV v. UKRAINE

Okay, here's a breakdown of the Strogush and Kropachev v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights: **1. Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in…

CASE OF SHCHERBAKOV AND ZHMUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a judgment in the case of *Shcherbakov and Zhmutskaya v. Russia* concerning violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The applicants complained about the lack of impartiality of the tribunal due to the absence of a prosecuting party in their administrative-offence…

CASE OF KOCHKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Here's a breakdown of the Kochkin and Others v. Russia decision: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** This judgment addresses multiple applications concerning violations of freedom of expression in Russia. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that Russian authorities had unduly restricted the applicants' rights under Article 10 of the Convention,…

CASE OF CHORNYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the Chornyy and Others v. Ukraine decision: 1. **Essence:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to inadequate conditions of detention in Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility and…

CASE OF ZUBCO AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

Here's a breakdown of the Zubco and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia decision: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on multiple applications concerning violations of human rights in the self-proclaimed "Moldovan Republic of Transnistria" ("MRT"). The applicants, who are residents of Transnistria,…

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/329 of 13 February 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 as regards adding the Republic of Moldova and Montenegro to the list of countries in the guarantor’s undertakings for transit

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/329 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 to include the Republic of Moldova and Montenegro in the list of countries for guarantor's undertakings for transit. This change is made in response to the accession of Moldova and Montenegro to the Convention on a Common Transit Procedure. The regulation ensures that the…

CASE OF PETKANYCH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of *Petkanych and Others v. Ukraine*: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that Ukraine failed to conduct effective investigations into alleged medical negligence that led to the deaths of the applicants' relatives.…

CASE OF MARTYNOVSKIY v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of Martynovskiy v. Ukraine: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The case concerned a Ukrainian lawyer, Mr. Martynovskiy, whose license was temporarily suspended for failing to attend a meeting of the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar (HQDCB).…

CASE OF MORAWIEC v. POLAND

Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' (ECtHR) judgment in the case of Morawiec v. Poland: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The case concerns a Polish judge, Beata Morawiec, who complained that the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court (DCSC) in Poland violated her rights under the European Convention on Human…

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 5 février 2026.#State Development Corporation “VEB.RF” contre Conseil de l’Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises au regard de la situation en Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Interdiction de fourniture de services spécialisés de messagerie financière à certains établissements de crédit russes ainsi qu’à leurs filiales russes – Décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous b) et d), et annexe – Règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous b) et d), et annexe I – Décision 2014/512/PESC – Article 1er sexies et annexe VIII – Règlement (UE) no 833/2014 – Article 5 nonies et annexe XIV – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’appliquent les mesures restrictives – Inscription et maintien du nom de la requérante sur ces listes – Obligation de motivation – Droit de propriété – Proportionnalité – Égalité de traitement – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Détournement de pouvoir.#Affaire C-572/24 P.

This Court decision concerns the appeal of State Development Corporation “VEB.RF” against the judgment of the General Court, which rejected its application for annulment of several Council decisions and implementing regulations regarding restrictive measures against actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Ukraine. These measures include the freezing of funds and…

Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in European Union crisis management operations

This notice announces the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia, which establishes a framework for Armenia's participation in EU crisis management operations. The agreement allows Armenia to contribute to EU's efforts in maintaining peace and security. The agreement entered into force on January 1, 2026, following…

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/270 of 4 February 2026 imposing provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of 1,4-Butanediol originating in the People’s Republic of China, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States of America

Here's a breakdown of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/270: **1. Essence of the Act:** This regulation imposes provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of 1,4-Butanediol (BDO) originating from China, Saudi Arabia, and the USA. The European Commission initiated an investigation following a complaint by a Union industry producer, finding sufficient evidence of dumping and material injury. The…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.