### Essence of the Act
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1233 establishes the technical and functional specifications for the "common addressing service" within the European Maritime Single Window environment (EMSWe). Its primary purpose is to enable ship operators, declarants, and data service providers to automatically connect their digital systems with the maritime national single windows of EU…
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Varva v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on an application concerning multiple violations of Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention arising from the applicant’s detention in Kharkiv in late 2014. The Court established that the applicant, Mykola Vasylyovych Varva, was subjected…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerns five joined applications lodged by Ukrainian citizens against Ukraine regarding the excessive length of civil proceedings. The Court unanimously ruled that Ukraine violated Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Shynkovska and Others v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) addressed the compatibility of life imprisonment in Ukraine without a realistic prospect of release with the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 3 of the Convention. The Court examined applications from four…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment, delivered by a Committee of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on 11 June 2026, concerns four joined applications against Ukraine regarding the deaths of the applicants' next of kin due to alleged medical negligence. The applicants asserted that the domestic authorities failed to conduct effective criminal…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment concerns a Ukrainian citizen, Oleksandr Mykhaylovych Kobylyanskyy, who was subjected to criminal proceedings lasting nearly eleven years within a single level of jurisdiction. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that this extraordinary delay violated the "reasonable time" requirement under Article 6 § 1 of the…
**** This judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of *Byalskyy v. Ukraine* addresses the failure of Ukrainian authorities to provide adequate medical care to a detainee, which the Court ruled as a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. The applicant, Vitaliy Oleksandrovych Byalskyy, suffered from deep tooth decay…
**** This judgment concerns a crucial ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) holding Russia responsible for violating the religious and associational freedoms of Ukrainian citizens in the occupied territory of the self-proclaimed "Donetsk People's Republic" ("DPR"). The case was brought by four Ukrainian nationals and a US-based organization representing Jehovah's Witnesses, who…
### The Essence of the Decision
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of *C.P. v. Spain* ruled on the delicate balance between a pregnant woman's right to reproductive autonomy and the state's interest in protecting unborn life. The applicant, a French national residing in Spain, was compulsorily admitted to a hospital under…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment concerns the case of a Ukrainian national, Mykola Vasylyovych Varva, who was arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) in November 2014 on terrorism-related charges and subsequently handed over to the self-proclaimed "Donetsk People's Republic" (DPR) during a prisoner exchange. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The judgment in the case of *Tamakulova and Others v. Ukraine* concerns five joined applications lodged by Ukrainian nationals who challenged the excessive length of civil proceedings in domestic courts and the lack of an effective remedy to address these delays. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) unanimously ruled…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Shynkovska and Others v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) examined the applications of four Ukrainian life-sentenced prisoners who challenged the lack of any realistic prospect of release under Article 3 of the Convention. The Court reiterated that for a life sentence to comply…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The judgment in *Kulish and Others v. Ukraine* addresses the critical failure of Ukrainian authorities to conduct effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants' relatives resulting from alleged medical negligence. Examining four joined applications under the procedural limb of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This **** judgment concerns a Ukrainian national, Oleksandr Mykhaylovych Kobylyanskyy, who faced domestic criminal proceedings lasting nearly eleven years within a single level of jurisdiction. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that Ukraine violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention due to the excessive and unreasonable…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Byalskyy v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled unanimously that Ukraine violated the European Convention on Human Rights regarding the treatment and detention of the applicant, Vitaliy Oleksandrovych Byalskyy. The Court found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention due to…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment concerns a complaint brought by four Ukrainian nationals and a US-based organization against the Russian Federation regarding the banning of the unregistered religious association of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the separatist "Donetsk People's Republic" (DPR) as "extremist" in 2018. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) established that it…
**1. Subject matter of the dispute:**
The subject matter of the dispute in this case is the unlawful refusal of the Pension Fund authority to recalculate the monthly lifetime financial allowance of a retired judge on the basis of a certificate in which the official salary was calculated taking into account the actual subsistence minimum for…
The subject matter of this dispute is the unlawful omission of a state authority, which consisted in the refusal to issue to a pensioner discharged from service updated certificates on the amount of his financial allowance as of 2020–2025 for pension recalculation taking into account the increase in the subsistence minimum.
The Court noted that for…
The subject matter of this dispute is the claim of a former rescuer for the recovery of average earnings from the Main Directorate of the State Emergency Service in Khmelnytskyi Oblast for the entire period of delay in settlement upon dismissal for the period from September 2018 to July 2024.
The Supreme Court noted that the…
The subject matter of this dispute is the recovery from the National Bank of Ukraine in favor of an individual of inflation losses and compensation for moral damage caused as a result of returning unexecuted a state executor's payment instruction for the forced debiting of funds from the account of the Deposit Guarantee Fund for…