The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued a judgment in the case of *Maslova and Others v. Russia*, concerning multiple applications related to the suppression of anti-war protests in St. Petersburg. The applicants, organizers and participants of these public assemblies, alleged that Russia disproportionately applied measures against them for breaching COVID-19 restrictions. The ECtHR…
Here's a breakdown of the Kytsko and Others v. Ukraine decision:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to inadequate conditions of detention in Poltava…
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued a judgment in the case of Konovalov and Others v. Russia, concerning multiple applications related to the disproportionate measures taken against organizers and participants of public assemblies in Russia. The applicants primarily complained about violations of their freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Convention, citing…
Here's a breakdown of the Klochkov and Others v. Russia decision from the European Court of Human Rights:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Russia violated Article 11 (freedom of assembly) of the Convention in the cases of several applicants who were disproportionately penalized for…
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a judgment in the case of *Kashbullina and Others v. Russia*, concerning disproportionate measures taken against organizers and participants of public assemblies in St. Petersburg for breaching COVID-19 restrictions. The applicants complained about arrests and convictions for administrative offenses related to their participation in public events. The…
Here's a breakdown of the Ivchenko v. Ukraine decision:
1. **Essence:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention due to the excessive length of…
Here's a breakdown of the Dubinkin and Others v. Russia decision:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Russia in violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly) of the Convention due to disproportionate measures taken against organizers and participants of public assemblies. The applicants were arrested…
Here's a breakdown of the Dmitruk and Others v. Russia decision:
1. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on a series of applications concerning disproportionate measures taken against individuals in Russia who organized or participated in public assemblies. The applicants argued that their rights were violated due to arrests and convictions…
Here's a breakdown of the Bilous v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which concerns…
Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of *Bespalov and Others v. Russia*:
1. **Essence of the Decision:**
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that Russia violated Article 11 of the Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees freedom of assembly, in a…
1. The subject of the dispute is the lawfulness of the refusal of the Main Department of the Pension Fund of Ukraine to grant an old-age pension in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Compulsory State Pension Insurance" to a person who already receives an old-age pension on preferential terms.
2. The Supreme Court, in…
1. The subject of the dispute is the appeal against the inaction of the border detachment and the obligation to accrue and pay additional remuneration to the serviceman in the amount of UAH 100,000 for participation in combat operations.
2. The court of cassation instance, overturning the decision of the court of appeal, was guided by…
1. The subject of the dispute is the inaction of the military unit regarding the non-accrual and non-payment of average earnings for the period of delay in settlement upon dismissal.
2. The court of cassation established that the courts of previous instances made mistakes in applying Article 117 of the Labor Code of Ukraine regarding the…
1. The subject of the dispute is the appeal against the tax authority's order to conduct a documentary scheduled on-site inspection.
2. The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of the courts of previous instances, which partially satisfied the claim by recognizing the inspection order as illegal only in the part of the period that had already…
1. The subject of the dispute is the inaction of the military unit regarding the failure to accrue and pay average earnings for the delay in settlement upon dismissal.
2. The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the courts of previous instances, as they incorrectly applied Article 117 of the Labor Code of Ukraine regarding the…
1. The subject of the dispute is the recovery of UAH 2,921,849.08.
2. The Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's decision, noting that the appellate court incorrectly applied the provisions of the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine regarding the consequences of the plaintiff's failure to appear at the court session. The court of first…
1. The subject of the dispute is the lawfulness of the defendant's actions in determining the amount of surcharges for academic degree and academic rank in the certificate of the amount of the plaintiff's financial support for pension recalculation.
2. The court of cassation considered the issue of whether the defendant lawfully indicated in the certificate…
1. The subject of the dispute is the challenge to the inaction of the military unit regarding the failure to accrue and pay average earnings for the delay in settlement upon dismissal.
2. The court of cassation agreed with the decisions of the courts of previous instances, which partially satisfied the claims, recognizing the inaction of…
1. The subject of the dispute is the legality of the transfer of a forest fund land plot into private ownership and the appeal of related decisions and agreements.
2. The Supreme Court found that the courts of previous instances did not fully investigate the circumstances of the case, in particular, did not properly clarify the…
1. The subject of the dispute is the prosecutor's demand to remove obstacles in the use and disposal of a non-residential building, which, according to the prosecutor's office, was illegally alienated from communal ownership.
2. The court of cassation overturned the decisions of the courts of previous instances, which closed the proceedings in the case, considering…