Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Review of ECHR decisions for 04/09/2026

CASE OF ASCIUTTO AND OTHERS v. ITALY This judgment, *Asciutto and Others v. Italy*, addresses the compatibility of the Italian "ergastolo ostativo" (irreducible life imprisonment) regime with the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court examined whether the automatic denial of parole and sentence adjustments for prisoners convicted of mafia-related crimes, who refused to cooperate…

CASE OF SYTNYK v. UKRAINE

**** **1. Essence of the Decision** The case of *Sytnyk v. Ukraine* concerns the prolonged inability of a property owner to evict previous owners from a flat he purchased at a public auction following a mortgage foreclosure. Despite the applicant holding a valid title, the Ukrainian Supreme Court denied his eviction claim, citing Article 109 of the…

CASE OF SPYRIDONIDIS v. ARMENIA

The judgment in *Spyridonidis v. Armenia* (application no. 35845/24) addresses the delicate intersection between international child abduction proceedings and the right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case involved a Greek national seeking the return of his two children from Armenia to Greece under the Hague Convention,…

CASE OF NEW GENERATION HUMANITARIAN NGO v. ARMENIA

The case of *New Generation Humanitarian NGO v. Armenia* (application no. 5837/17) concerns a dispute over access to the Court of Cassation following a failed defamation claim against a media outlet. The applicant NGO, which advocates for LGBT rights, sought redress for a series of articles it characterized as hate speech, but its appeal was…

CASE OF MOLINA MARÍN AND OTHERS v. SPAIN

This judgment concerns the criminal conviction of four individuals who participated in a 2011 protest outside the Parliament of Catalonia, where they were accused of obstructing members of parliament (MPs) from attending a budget session. The applicants were initially acquitted by the *Audiencia Nacional*, which found their actions to be a protected exercise of the…

CASE OF BELOUS v. UKRAINE

This judgment, **** for the protection of human rights in Ukraine, concerns the case of Mr. Fedor Belous, a life prisoner with a second-degree disability who is reliant on a wheelchair. The applicant alleged that his detention in Zhytomyr Prison no. 8 was inhumane due to a lack of facilities adapted for his disability, which…

CASE OF B.C. v. ITALY

The case of *B.C. v. Italy* (application no. 42909/23) concerns the arbitrary detention of an unaccompanied minor in a reception centre that lacked a clear legal basis for such deprivation of liberty. The applicant, an Ivoirian national, was placed in the "C.A.R.A." of Restinco, a facility that functioned as a de facto detention centre where…

CASE OF ASLANYAN v. ARMENIA

This judgment concerns the failure of Armenian authorities to enforce a court-ordered interim measure granting grandparents contact rights with their grandson. The applicants, Russian nationals, sought to visit the child after his mother relocated to Armenia without the father’s consent. Despite a clear judicial order for visitation, the child’s mother repeatedly obstructed these meetings, and…

CASE OF A.S. v. LATVIA

This analysis concerns the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in *A.S. v. Latvia* (Application no. 9327/23), delivered on 3 September 2026. ### 1. Essence of the Decision The case centers on whether Latvia fulfilled its positive obligations under Article 4 of the Convention (prohibition of slavery, servitude, and forced or compulsory labour) regarding…

Review of Ukrainian Supreme Court’s decisions for 04/09/2026

Case No. 144/1508/19 dated 08/24/2026 Greetings. As a lawyer with many years of experience, I have analyzed the court decision you provided. Here is a detailed analysis: 1. **Subject of the dispute:** Division of property acquired by spouses during marriage, and counterclaims to recognize this property as the personal private property of one of the spouses. 2. **Court…

Case No. 500/270/25 dated 08/31/2026

Here is a detailed analysis of the court decision, prepared for you: 1. **Subject of the dispute:** The plaintiff challenged the decision of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine to refuse the payment of a one-time monetary assistance in the amount of UAH 15,000,000 in connection with the death of her husband, a serviceman, insisting on…

Review of the EU legislation for 04/09/2026

Please provide the text or the list of legislative acts you wish me to analyze. You have not included the content in your message. Once provided, I will deliver the comprehensive review in the requested format. Review of each of legal acts published today: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1092 of 21 May 2026 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.