Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    ↵
    Open chat icon
    EU legislation (detailed)

    Review of the EU legislation for 19/06/2026

    June 19, 2026 0

    Please provide the specific list or references to the legal acts you wish for me to analyze. Once provided, I will deliver the requested professional overview.

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1341 of 17 June 2026 initiating a review of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1266 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1267 imposing definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1337 of 17 June 2026 granting a Union authorisation for the biocidal product family Ecolab Glut Family in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1352 of 17 June 2026 granting a Union authorisation for the biocidal product family Ecolab GA 24-50 BPF in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/1339 of 17 June 2026 correcting Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for fenpyrazamine in or on certain products


    Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.Belaruskali AAT and Others v Council of the European Union.Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Inclusion of the appellants’ names – Definition of ‘Lukashenko regime’ – Definition of persons ‘benefiting’ from or ‘supporting’ that regime – Obligation to state reasons – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality.Joined Cases C-816/24 P to C-818/24 P.


    Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 18. Juni 2026.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Verordnung (EU) 2019/1009 – Art. 42 Abs. 7 und 8 – Bereitstellung von EU-Düngeprodukten auf dem Markt – Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2022/973 – Art. 2 Abs. 2 und 3 – Kriterien für agronomische Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit bei der Verwendung von Nebenprodukten in EU-Düngeprodukten – Grenzwerte für Chrom und Vanadium in EU-Düngeprodukten, in denen Eisenschlacken als Nebenprodukte verwendet werden – Vorsorgeprinzip – Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-754/24 P.


    Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.FIBO MARKETS Limited v J.P.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed.Case C-346/25.


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026.Datenschutzbehörde and Dr. G S v Bundesministerin für Justiz and D GmbH.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence.Case C-414/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA).Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 52(1) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Interpretation and limitation on the exercise of that freedom.Case C-376/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content containing elements making it possible indirectly to identify a person as an individual – Action seeking measures to eliminate and preclude the effects of such a breach and seeking compensation for non-material damage.Case C-232/25.


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.BG v Ministero della Difesa.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 1 – Purpose – Article 2(2)(a) and (b) – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of belief – National legislation requiring military personnel to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 – Difference in treatment based on membership of a particular professional category – Concept of ‘belief’.Case C-522/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.Case C-484/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.Case C-658/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.Case C-575/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.Case C-484/24.


    Decision No 1/2026 of the Joint European Union/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 15 June 2026 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport [2026/1252]


    EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision of 4 March 2026 amending the substantive rules in the field of State aid by amending the Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading post-2021 [2026/1374]


    Judgment of the Court of 5 March 2026 in Joined Cases E-31/24 and E-32/24 – Toska ehf. and Lyf og heilsa hf. and SKEL fjárfestingafélag hf. and the EFTA Surveillance Authority (Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority – Competition law – Inspection decision – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Effect on trade – Ne bis in idem)


    Judgment of the Court of 11 March 2026 in Case E-20/25 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement – Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/151 – Security of network and information systems – Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society)


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 11 March 2026 in Case E-19/25 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement – Directive (EU) 2016/1148 – Cybersecurity of network and information systems – Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society)


    Judgment of the Court of 11 March 2026 in Case E-22/25 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement – Regulation (EU) 2019/881 – Cybersecurity – Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society)

    You May Also Like

    View All
    May 30, 2026
    Review of the EU legislation for 30/05/2026
    March 27, 2026
    Review of the EU legislation for 27/03/2026
    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.