Subject of the dispute - challenging the decision of the High Council of Justice in a lawsuit filed by an individual. Since the available text contains only the introductory and operative parts of the resolution, without the reasoning part, it is impossible to determine the arguments that guided the court in making its decision.
The Grand…
The court was guided by the fact that the application for review of a court decision on newly discovered circumstances was filed after the expiration of the three-year period from the day the decision entered into legal force. In accordance with the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of Ukraine, this term cannot be renewed regardless…
The court, in rendering its decision, was guided by the fact that the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) considered the issue of including the judge's application in the agenda of the plenary session, but the commission members voted against its inclusion. The court noted that to recognize inaction as unlawful, the mere fact of…
Subject of the dispute - challenging the acts of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and its inaction. Unfortunately, it is impossible to determine the main arguments of the court from the provided text, as only the introductory and operative parts of the decision are presented, without the reasoning part, where the legal…
Case No. 991/4164/23 dated 31/10/2024
The subject of the dispute cannot be determined, as only the introductory and operative parts of the court decision are provided without the descriptive and motivational parts. The court does not provide arguments for the decision, as the motivational part is absent in the provided text. The Appellate Chamber of the…
Subject of the dispute - challenging the decision of the High Council of Justice in a lawsuit filed by an individual. Since the available text contains only the introductory and operative parts of the resolution, without the reasoning part, it is impossible to determine the arguments that guided the court in making its decision.
The Grand…
The court was guided by the fact that an application for review of a court decision based on newly discovered circumstances may be filed no later than three years from the day the decision entered into legal force. Since the decision entered into legal force on December 5, 2018, and the application was filed only…
The court, in rendering its decision, was guided by the fact that the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) considered the issue of including the judge's application in the agenda of the plenary session, but the commission members voted against its inclusion. The court noted that to recognize inaction as unlawful, the mere fact of…
Subject of the dispute - challenging the acts of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and its inaction. Unfortunately, it is impossible to determine the main arguments of the court from the provided text, as only the introductory and operative parts of the decision are presented, without the reasoning part, where the legal…
**Case No. 991/4164/23 dated 31/10/2024**
**Subject of Dispute:** Appeal against the decision of the High Anti-Corruption Court in a case where the defendant is PERSON_1.
**Main Arguments of the Court:** The Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court, after reviewing the appeal by attorney Shpak V.I., concluded that there are no grounds for its satisfaction and that…
1. INDIVIDUAL_1 challenged the decision of the High Council of Justice to deny his claims.
2. The plaintiff, INDIVIDUAL_1, requested the annulment of the decision of the High Council of Justice, while the defendant, the High Council of Justice, defended the legality of its decision.
3. The courts of previous instances denied INDIVIDUAL_1's claim and upheld the…
December 5, 2018, and the three-year period for filing an application for review based on newly discovered circumstances ended on December 5, 2021; since the application was submitted in July 2024.
Appeal Against the Inaction of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ) Regarding the Non-Consideration of Judge PERSON_1's Application for the Dismissal of Commission Member PERSON_2 Due to Gross Negligence of Duties.
2. The parties in the case were Judge PERSON_1, who believed that the HQCJ violated her rights by not properly considering her…
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, recognition of its inaction as unlawful, and obligation of the Commission to perform certain actions.
The parties in the case were the plaintiff, INDIVIDUAL_1, who demanded the annulment of the Commission's acts and to compel it to act, and the defendant, the Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine,…
The subject of the dispute was the **nullification of the results of a state procurement and the contract for the capital repair of a military canteen** in the city of Poltava.
The prosecution, in the interest of the **Ministry of Defense of Ukraine**, claimed that the procurement was conducted **with violations**, while the defendants — the…
[Case No. 240/15899/20 dated 28/10/2024](https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/122668685)
**The courts established** that documents confirming the violation of rights were not attached, and that the **Ministry of Justice should have denied** the complaint based on points 1 and 7 of part eight of Article 34 of Law No. 755.
3. **Court Decision**: The Supreme Court **dismissed the cassation appeal** of the…
Appeal Against the Decree of the President of Ukraine on the Application of Sanctions Against INDIVIDUAL_1. The parties in the case were INDIVIDUAL_1, who contested the legality of the sanctions applied to him, and President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, who defended the legitimacy of his decree.
The court of first instance left the lawsuit without consideration…
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
и матеріали справи, зазначив, що позивач надав достатні докази щодо наявності моральної шкоди, завданої його правам внаслідок дій державних органів. Суд підкреслив, що дії органів, що здійснюють оперативно-розшукову діяльність, та інших суб'єктів досудового розслідування, не відповідали вимогам законодавства, що призвело до порушення прав позивача.
У рішенні суду було вказано, що позивач має право на відшкодування моральної…
