Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/695 of 14 March 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

Okay, I can help you with that. Here's a breakdown of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/695: **1. Essence of the Act:** This regulation amends Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, which concerns restrictive measures against actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Ukraine. The new regulation updates the list of individuals and entities subject…

CASE OF REMEZ v. UKRAINE

Okay, here is the analysis of the decision in the case of Remez v. Ukraine. **** 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to an ineffective investigation into the ill-treatment of…

CASE OF GATSKO AND PANOV v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of Gatsko and Panov v. Ukraine: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The case concerns two Ukrainian nationals, Gatsko and Panov, who were sanctioned for holding peaceful demonstrations. The applicants complained that their rights to freedom of assembly,…

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/568 of 10 March 2026 amending and correcting Annexes I and II to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/594 laying down special disease control measures for African swine fever

Here's a breakdown of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/568: **1. Essence of the Act:** This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/594, which lays down special disease control measures for African swine fever (ASF). The changes involve updating the restricted zones (I, II, and III) listed in Annex I and the infected zones listed in Annex II…

CASE OF ZINCHENKO AND TAMTURA v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the case of Zinchenko and Tamtura v. Ukraine: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) examined two primary complaints in this case. First, the applicants alleged that their confinement in a glass dock during court hearings…

CASE OF KAGANOVSKYY v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

Okay, I will provide you with a detailed description of the decision in the case of Kaganovskyy v. Ukraine (No. 2). **1. Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 5 §§ 1, 4, and 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the unlawful detention…

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/489 of 26 February 2026 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

Here's a breakdown of the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/489: * **Essence:** This regulation amends Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 208/2014, which concerns restrictive measures against certain individuals, entities, and bodies in light of the situation in Ukraine. The amendment specifically updates information regarding the rights of defense and the right to effective…

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/483 of 25 February 2026 amending Annexes I and II to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/594 laying down special disease control measures for African swine fever and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/350 concerning certain interim emergency measures relating to African swine fever in Poland

Here is a description of the provisions of the act: **1. Essence of the Act:** This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/483 amends Annexes I and II of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/594, which lays down special disease control measures for African swine fever (ASF). The amendments involve updating the lists of restricted zones (I, II, and III) and…

CASE OF VITKOVSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the ECHR's decision in the case of *Vitkovskyy and Others v. Ukraine*: **1. Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled that Ukraine violated Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the case of nine…

CASE OF TINYK-ZHUK v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the Tinyk-Zhuk v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights found Ukraine in violation of Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to an ineffective investigation into the…

CASE OF STROGUSH AND KROPACHEV v. UKRAINE

Okay, here's a breakdown of the Strogush and Kropachev v. Ukraine decision from the European Court of Human Rights: **1. Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in…

CASE OF SHCHERBAKOV AND ZHMUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a judgment in the case of *Shcherbakov and Zhmutskaya v. Russia* concerning violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The applicants complained about the lack of impartiality of the tribunal due to the absence of a prosecuting party in their administrative-offence…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.