Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

CASE OF SEKSIMP GROUP SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

### Essence of the Decision This judgment determines the just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant company, Seksimp Group SRL, following a principal judgment that found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 by the Republic of Moldova. The case originated from domestic court orders requiring the applicant to…

CASE OF BRUN v. SWITZERLAND

### 1. Essence of the Decision In the case of *Brun v. Switzerland*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that there was no violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken in conjunction with Article 4 (prohibition of forced labour) of the Convention. The applicant, a Swiss man declared medically unfit for military…

CASE OF LETUCHA v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the Letucha v. Ukraine decision: **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to the denial of access to a court of appeal for the applicant, Ms. Letucha.…

CASE OF FOMICHOV AND ALAND GROUP, TOV v. UKRAINE

Here's a breakdown of the Fomichov and Aland Group, TOV v. Ukraine decision: 1. **Essence of the Decision:** The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found Ukraine in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which guarantees the right to a fair…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.