**** This judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of *Byalskyy v. Ukraine* addresses the failure of Ukrainian authorities to provide adequate medical care to a detainee, which the Court ruled as a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. The applicant, Vitaliy Oleksandrovych Byalskyy, suffered from deep tooth decay…
**** This judgment concerns a crucial ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) holding Russia responsible for violating the religious and associational freedoms of Ukrainian citizens in the occupied territory of the self-proclaimed "Donetsk People's Republic" ("DPR"). The case was brought by four Ukrainian nationals and a US-based organization representing Jehovah's Witnesses, who…
### The Essence of the Decision
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of *C.P. v. Spain* ruled on the delicate balance between a pregnant woman's right to reproductive autonomy and the state's interest in protecting unborn life. The applicant, a French national residing in Spain, was compulsorily admitted to a hospital under…
CASE OF C.P. v. SPAIN
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), in its judgment *C.P. v. Spain*, ruled that a Spanish court's order for the compulsory hospital admission of a pregnant woman to give birth did not violate her right to respect for private life under Article 8 of…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment concerns the case of a Ukrainian national, Mykola Vasylyovych Varva, who was arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) in November 2014 on terrorism-related charges and subsequently handed over to the self-proclaimed "Donetsk People's Republic" (DPR) during a prisoner exchange. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The judgment in the case of *Tamakulova and Others v. Ukraine* concerns five joined applications lodged by Ukrainian nationals who challenged the excessive length of civil proceedings in domestic courts and the lack of an effective remedy to address these delays. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) unanimously ruled…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Shynkovska and Others v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) examined the applications of four Ukrainian life-sentenced prisoners who challenged the lack of any realistic prospect of release under Article 3 of the Convention. The Court reiterated that for a life sentence to comply…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The judgment in *Kulish and Others v. Ukraine* addresses the critical failure of Ukrainian authorities to conduct effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants' relatives resulting from alleged medical negligence. Examining four joined applications under the procedural limb of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This **** judgment concerns a Ukrainian national, Oleksandr Mykhaylovych Kobylyanskyy, who faced domestic criminal proceedings lasting nearly eleven years within a single level of jurisdiction. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that Ukraine violated Article 6 § 1 of the Convention due to the excessive and unreasonable…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Byalskyy v. Ukraine*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled unanimously that Ukraine violated the European Convention on Human Rights regarding the treatment and detention of the applicant, Vitaliy Oleksandrovych Byalskyy. The Court found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention due to…
****
### 1. Essence of the Decision
This judgment concerns a complaint brought by four Ukrainian nationals and a US-based organization against the Russian Federation regarding the banning of the unregistered religious association of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the separatist "Donetsk People's Republic" (DPR) as "extremist" in 2018. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) established that it…
CASE OF ANIČIĆ v. SERBIA
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled in the case of *Aničić v. Serbia* (Application no. 36639/22) that there was no violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) regarding minor-offence proceedings for a road traffic accident. The applicant, a professional lorry driver, was convicted of…
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
CASE OF BRUN v. SWITZERLAND
### 1. Essence of the Decision
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled unanimously in the case of *Brun v. Switzerland* that Switzerland's military-service exemption tax, levied on Swiss men unfit for service but not on Swiss women or foreign residents, does not violate the prohibition of discrimination (Article 14…
This judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of *Seksimp Group SRL v. the Republic of Moldova* (Just Satisfaction) represents a crucial determination of financial redress following a complex property dispute. The case stems from a domestic litigation where Moldovan courts, without adequate reasoning, ordered the applicant company to pay…
CASE OF BRUN v. SWITZERLAND
### 1. Essence of the Decision
In the case of *Brun v. Switzerland*, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously ruled that there was no violation of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken in conjunction with Article 4 (prohibition of forced labour) of the Convention. The applicant, a Swiss man…
### Essence of the Decision
This judgment determines the just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant company, Seksimp Group SRL, following a principal judgment that found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 by the Republic of Moldova. The case originated from domestic court orders requiring the applicant to…