Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    ↵
    Open chat icon
    EU legislation (detailed)

    Review of the EU legislation for 03/09/2026

    September 3, 2026 0

    Please provide the list of legal acts you would like me to review. As soon as you provide the text or references, I will proceed with the analysis according to your requirements.

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1214 of 9 June 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1257 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards conditions for testing compliance with brake particle emission limits


    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1167 of 28 May 2026 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying operational risk requirements


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1166 of 28 May 2026 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the mapping of the business indicator components with corresponding supervisory reporting references


    Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.Case T-376/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Jaime García Ávila contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne tridimensionnelle – Forme d’une bouteille bleue comportant des éléments verbaux – Marque nationale figurative antérieure 1890 ESPECIAL EXÓTICA GIN PREMIUM – Cause de nullité absolue – Absence de mauvaise foi – Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Cause de nullité relative – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-678/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.ES v European Commission.Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.Case T-416/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ – Earlier national company name Health Labs – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Distinctiveness – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rejection of the opposition.Case T-635/25.


    Urteil des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke, die die Kombination der drei Farben Weiß, Dunkelblau und Blau darstellt – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Begründungspflicht – Art. 94 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache T-835/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S v European Commission.Medicinal products for human use – Generic medicinal products – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Degarelix Accord – degarelix acetate – Lack of bioequivalence study with the reference medicinal product – Article 10(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/83/EC – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of good administration.Case T-12/24.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Stratio Big Data Inc. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale stratio – Incident technique lors de la production d’éléments de preuve et de leurs traductions par l’une des parties – Absence de transmission par l’EUIPO de certaines traductions à l’autre partie – Droits de la défense – Principe du contradictoire – Article 94, paragraphe 1, deuxième phrase, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-49/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark HealthLabs PHARM – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark – Earlier national company name Health Labs Care Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowa – Likelihood of confusion.Case T-681/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.A&P Deco NV v Belgische Staat.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Articles 19 and 29 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof – Concomitant and separate letting contract of an immovable property – Taking over a business – Letting of a building – Building let by the transferor to the transferee of a business and used by the transferee for the purpose of carrying out the taxable activity taken over – Right of deduction – Articles 184 to 190 of Directive 2006/112 – Adjustment of the VAT deduction by the transferor.Case T-397/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.F R v Finanzamt Österreich.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Supply of goods for consideration – Article 2(1)(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Application of a business asset transferred free of charge or applied for purposes other than those of the business – Article 16 of Directive 2006/112 – Transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof – Article 19 of Directive 2006/112 – Contribution of developed properties – Option for the Member States to exclude the transfer of a totality of assets or part thereof from the scope of VAT – Direct effect.Case T-413/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Warbud S.A. v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.Public works contracts – Tendering procedure – Design and construction of Frontex permanent premises – Rejection of a tenderer’s tender – Action for annulment – Act open to challenge – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Abnormally low tender.Case T-658/24.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Igor Albertovich Kesaev contre Conseil de l’Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires ayant une activité dans des secteurs économiques qui fournissent une source substantielle de revenus au gouvernement de la Fédération de Russie” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Exception d’illégalité – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Sécurité juridique – Égalité de traitement.#Affaire T-296/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.Opera Norway AS v European Commission.Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Designation of gatekeepers – Web browser – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Important gateway for business users to reach end users – Presumption – Article 17(3) of Regulation 2022/1925 – Market investigation for designating gatekeepers – Action for annulment – Individual concern – Admissibility – Duty to state reasons – Error of law – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration.Case T-357/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 September 2026.Global Legal Action Network and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) v European Commission.Environment – Regulation (EU) 2018/842 – Annual greenhouse gas emission reductions – Review of annual greenhouse gas emission allocations of the Member States for the period from 2023 to 2030 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1319 – Refusal of the request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Aarhus Convention – Grounds for review of Regulations (EU) 2021/1119 and (EU) 2023/857 setting out the European Union’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2030 – Implementing power of the Commission – Article 291(2) TFEU – Grounds for review directed against an impact assessment – Legislative proposal.Case T-120/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Özkan Demir Çelik Sanayi AŞ v European Commission.Dumping – Imports of steel bulb flats originating in China and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/209 – Article 2(10)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Currency conversions – Article 2(4), (10) and (11) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Ordinary course of trade – Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value – Quarterly dumping margin calculation).Case T-175/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.ES v European Commission.Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.Case T-416/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Design representing a footwear sole – Prior EU designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Degree of attention of an informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.Case T-376/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Jaime García Ávila contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne tridimensionnelle – Forme d’une bouteille bleue comportant des éléments verbaux – Marque nationale figurative antérieure 1890 ESPECIAL EXÓTICA GIN PREMIUM – Cause de nullité absolue – Absence de mauvaise foi – Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Cause de nullité relative – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-678/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 September 2026.Health Labs Care S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NPhealthLABS+ – Earlier national company name Health Labs – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to prohibit the use of a subsequent mark – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Distinctiveness – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Rejection of the opposition.Case T-635/25.


    Urteil des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 2. September 2026.#Olymp Bezner KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsbildmarke, die die Kombination der drei Farben Weiß, Dunkelblau und Blau darstellt – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Fehlende Unterscheidungskraft – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Begründungspflicht – Art. 94 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Gleichbehandlung.#Rechtssache T-835/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2026.World 2 Meet Travel SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark newblue – Earlier EU word marks JETBLUE and BYBLUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.Case T-481/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#Royal contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative ROYAL – Motifs absolus de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Absence de caractère distinctif acquis par l’usage – Article 7, paragraphe 3, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-675/25.

    You May Also Like

    View All
    March 31, 2026
    Review of the EU legislation for 31/03/2026
    November 3, 2025
    Review of the EU legislation for 03/11/2025
    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.