EU Legislation Review
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2025/1079
This directive updates the examination protocols for agricultural and vegetable plant varieties, aligning Member States’ national catalogs with the latest standards from the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) and the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). Specifically, it replaces the annexes of Directives 2003/90/EC and 2003/91/EC with updated lists of species and corresponding technical protocols. Member States must transpose this into national law by December 31, 2025, with application from January 1, 2026. Ongoing examinations before this date will continue under the old rules.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1131
This regulation amends Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 to enhance European environmental economic accounts. It includes detailed data on investments related to climate change mitigation and aligns the accounts with the international Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP). Annexes IV, V, and VIII are modified, updating the CEP used for data reporting, introducing new reporting requirements for gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) related to climate change mitigation, and refining the characteristics for statistics on the environmental goods and services sector.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1130
This regulation corrects an error in the Dutch language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 regarding unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). The correction specifically addresses a requirement for class C6 unmanned aircraft systems in order to ensure the correct implementation of the rules in the Netherlands.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1124
This regulation corrects Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273 to allow for a simplified analysis report for wine imports from Canada, under certain conditions. Canadian wine producers can now use a simplified version of the analysis report when importing wines in labeled containers not exceeding 60 litres with non-reusable closing devices. This implements the Agreement between the EU and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks. The change adds Canada to the list of countries that can use the simplified procedure.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144
This regulation updates the EU Air Safety List, amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006. The updated lists in Annex A and Annex B impact which airlines are permitted to operate within the EU. All air carriers certified in Suriname and Tanzania are added to Annex A, effectively banning them from operating in the EU. Operating bans on air carriers from Armenia, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, and Libya are maintained.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1102
This regulation amends Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 by including five biological substances for which no maximum residue limits (MRLs) are required in foodstuffs of animal origin. The substances include bovine casein hydrolysate, probiotic components, recombinant bovine IL-8, stem cells, and Varroa destructor calmodulin gene-specific double-stranded interfering RNA. This is based on scientific advice from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which concluded that these substances do not pose a risk to public health.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1103
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/12, specifying the requirements for applications and requests for the establishment of a ‘no MRL required’ classification for chemical-unlike biological substances. Applicants must now provide the particulars and documents outlined in section I.7, first paragraph, points (a) to (e), of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/782.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1105
This regulation amends Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, focusing on the classification of ketoprofen regarding its maximum residue limits (MRLs) in animal-derived foodstuffs. It updates the permitted levels of ketoprofen in various animal species, including ruminants, porcine animals, Equidae, and poultry, to ensure food safety standards are maintained and restricts its use in egg-laying poultry.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1084
This regulation registers ‘Странджански билков чай / Strandzhanski bilkov chay’ as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO). The tea, from the Sideritis plant grown in the Strandzha mountain region of Bulgaria, is recognized for its unique qualities tied to its geographical origin and traditional production methods.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1086
This regulation approves a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Fiano di Avellino’. The updated specification, as published in the Official Journal, is now the legally binding standard for wines produced under this PDO.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1087
This regulation approves a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected geographical indication (PGI) ‘Chosco de Tineo’. The updated specification is now the official standard for this product, and producers must adhere to it to use the PGI designation. Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 is repealed.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1075
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1927, updating the list of demarcated areas established for the containment of *Aleurocanthus spiniferus* (spiny whitefly). It acknowledges that eradication is no longer feasible in certain regions and adjusts buffer zones.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1076
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1372, extending the temporary measures to prevent the spread of *Meloidogyne graminicola* (rice root-knot nematode) until 30 June 2026.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1092
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, updating the list of approved active substances used in plant protection products. The update removes substances for which renewal applications were not submitted or were withdrawn and modifies entries for other substances to reflect changes in their approval status.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1091
This regulation corrects an error in a previous amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, concerning the import of certain plants for planting of the Prunus L. genus. It re-introduces an exemption for specific Prunus species originating in Moldova.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1080
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1659, which sets out equivalent requirements for the import of Citrus sinensis fruits from Israel concerning the pest Thaumatotibia leucotreta. It removes the time limit on these requirements, making them permanent.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1088
This regulation amends Implementing Regulations (EU) 2018/2019 and (EU) 2020/1213 regarding the import of certain Alnus plants (Alder) from the United Kingdom. It removes specific Alnus plants from the list of high-risk plants, subject to certain conditions, but introduces phytosanitary measures to address the risk of the pest *Phytophthora siskiyouensis*.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1082
This regulation introduces a temporary derogation from prohibitions on importing certain plants from Kenya. Specifically, it allows the import of unrooted cuttings of *Calibrachoa spp.*, *Petunia spp.*, and their hybrids, subject to strict conditions to prevent the introduction of plant pests. The derogation is effective until April 30, 2028.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1078
This regulation introduces a temporary derogation from the general prohibition on importing plants for planting from the Solanaceae family, specifically allowing the import of unrooted cuttings of Calibrachoa spp., Petunia spp., and their hybrids from Guatemala, with strict phytosanitary requirements. The derogation is effective until 30 April 2028.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1101
This regulation amends Regulation (EU) 2018/782, refining the assessment process by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for maximum residue limits (MRLs) for biological substances that are unlike chemicals in food-producing animals, aligning with regulations on pharmacologically active substances.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1090
This regulation amends Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) regarding restrictions on N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and 1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-one (NEP). It sets strict limits on their use and concentration in industrial and professional settings to protect workers from health risks.
Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) Judgment
This judgment interprets Council Directive 2002/90/CE on defining the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence. The Court ruled that Article 1(1)(a) of the Directive should be interpreted in light of Articles 7, 18, and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, protecting individuals who are acting to protect and care for minors under their custody from being criminalized.
Decision No. 2/2024 of the EU-Armenia Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications
This decision amends Annex X to the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Armenia. It updates the list of protected geographical indications for products from both the EU and Armenia, strengthening trade relations and protecting intellectual property rights.
Review of each of legal acts published today:
Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2025/1079 of 2 June 2025 amending Directives 2003/90/EC and 2003/91/EC as regards the protocols for the examination of certain varieties of agricultural plant species and vegetable species
This Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2025/1079 amends Directives 2003/90/EC and 2003/91/EC, updating the protocols for examining varieties of agricultural plant species and vegetable species. The main goal is to ensure that Member States comply with the latest protocols established by the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) and the guidelines of the International Union for Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) when including varieties in their national catalogues. The directive reflects updates to CPVO protocols, particularly for red clover, swede rape, turnip rape, asparagus, chilli or pepper, industrial chicory, melon, cucumber and gherkin, marrow or courgette, and lettuce.
The structure of the directive is straightforward. It consists of six articles and an annex divided into two parts (A and B). Articles 1 and 2 specify the amendments to Directives 2003/90/EC and 2003/91/EC, respectively, by replacing their annexes with updated lists of species and corresponding CPVO technical protocols or UPOV test guidelines. Article 3 mandates Member States to transpose the directive into national law by December 31, 2025, and to apply these provisions from January 1, 2026. Article 4 includes transitional measures, ensuring that ongoing official examinations started before January 1, 2026, will continue under the previous directives. Article 5 states the entry into force, and Article 6 specifies that the directive is addressed to the Member States. The annexes provide updated lists of agricultural and vegetable species, indicating whether CPVO protocols or UPOV test guidelines should be followed for their examination.
The most important provisions for practical use are the updated annexes, which detail the specific CPVO protocols and UPOV guidelines that must be followed for examining different plant varieties. The transitional measures are also crucial, as they allow ongoing examinations to continue under the old rules, preventing disruption. The implementation deadline of January 1, 2026, is also a key date for Member States to ensure compliance.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1131 of 26 March 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards investments on climate change mitigation and introducing the classification of environmental purposes
This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1131 amends Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 to enhance the European environmental economic accounts. The key aims are to include detailed data on investments related to climate change mitigation and to align the accounts with the international Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP). This will improve the availability and comparability of data for Union policies on environment, climate action, and sustainability.
The regulation modifies Annexes IV, V, and VIII of Regulation (EU) No 691/2011. These annexes concern environmental protection expenditure accounts, the environmental goods and services sector, and environmental subsidies and similar transfers, respectively. The amendments involve updating the classification of environmental purposes (CEP) used for data reporting, introducing new reporting requirements for gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) related to climate change mitigation, and refining the characteristics for which Member States must produce statistics on the environmental goods and services sector. Several points and sections are either replaced or deleted to streamline and update the reporting requirements.
The most important provisions for practical use include the updated list of characteristics for statistics on the environmental goods and services sector, which now includes detailed reporting on GFCF for climate change mitigation activities and products. Additionally, the alignment with the international Classification of Environmental Purposes (CEP) ensures that data collection and reporting are standardized and comparable across different countries and international organizations. These changes will likely impact how Member States collect and report data related to environmental and climate-related economic activities.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1130 of 18 March 2025 correcting the Dutch language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems
This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1130 addresses an error found in the Dutch language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945, which concerns unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and operators from third countries. The error specifically relates to a requirement for class C6 unmanned aircraft systems. The regulation aims to correct this error to ensure the accurate implementation of the original regulation across all language versions.
The structure of the act is very simple. It contains a preamble that explains the reason for the correction, followed by two articles. Article 1 contains the correction itself, but states that it does not concern the English language. Article 2 specifies the date of entry into force, which is the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, and confirms that the regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States.
The main provision of this regulation is the correction of the Dutch language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945. While the specifics of the correction are not detailed in this regulation (as they pertain only to the Dutch version), it is important for those working with UAS in the Netherlands to be aware of this correction to ensure compliance with the correct requirements for class C6 unmanned aircraft systems.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1124 of 19 March 2025 correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273 as regards the import of wine originating in Canada
This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1124 corrects Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273 to allow for the simplified procedure for the analysis report section of the VI-1 document for wine imports from Canada. This means that Canadian wine producers can use a simplified version of the analysis report when importing wines in labelled containers not exceeding 60 litres with non-reusable closing devices. The correction aims to fully implement the Agreement between the European Community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks.
The regulation consists of two articles. Article 1 amends Annex VII to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273, Part IV, Section A, by including Canada in the list of third countries that can use the simplified procedure outlined in Article 21(b) of the same regulation. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The most important provision is the inclusion of Canada in the list of countries in Annex VII, Part IV, Section A of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/273. This allows Canadian wine producers to use a simplified analysis report for their wine exports to the EU under certain conditions (labelled containers up to 60 litres with non-reusable closing devices).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144 of 3 June 2025 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union
This is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144, which amends Regulation (EC) No 474/2006, regarding the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the European Union. The regulation updates the EU Air Safety List based on new information received from Member States, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), third countries, and international organizations. The Commission has provided the concerned air carriers with the opportunity to consult relevant documentation, submit comments, and make presentations.
The regulation’s structure involves replacing Annex A (list of air carriers banned from operating within the EU) and Annex B (list of air carriers subject to operational restrictions within the EU) of the original Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 with updated lists.
The most important provisions of this regulation are the updated lists in Annex A and Annex B, which directly impact which airlines are permitted to operate within the EU. Specifically, this regulation adds all air carriers certified in Suriname and Tanzania to Annex A, effectively banning them from operating in the EU due to safety concerns. The regulation also maintains the operating bans on air carriers from Armenia, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, and Libya, as well as other countries, after assessing their aviation safety oversight.
**** This regulation has implications for Ukraine and Ukrainians, as it affects the ability of certain airlines to operate within the EU, which could impact travel options for Ukrainian citizens.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1102 of 3 June 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards chemical-unlike biological substances
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1102 amends Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 by including five chemical-unlike biological substances for which no maximum residue limits (MRLs) are required in foodstuffs of animal origin. These substances include bovine casein hydrolysate, probiotic components, recombinant bovine IL-8, stem cells, and Varroa destructor calmodulin gene-specific double-stranded interfering RNA. The regulation is based on scientific advice from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which concluded that these substances do not pose a risk to public health.
The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 is amended as set out in the Annex to this regulation. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. The Annex adds five new entries to Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, listing the five chemical-unlike biological substances with a classification of “No MRL required.”
The most important provision of this regulation is the inclusion of the five chemical-unlike biological substances in Table 1 of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 with a classification of “No MRL required.” This means that these substances can be used in animals without the need to establish maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin, simplifying the regulatory requirements for their use.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1103 of 3 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/12 as regards the requirements for applications and requests for the establishment of a no MRL required classification for chemical-unlike biological substances
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1103 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/12. The new regulation specifies the requirements for applications and requests for the establishment of a ‘no MRL required’ classification for chemical-unlike biological substances. It aims to clarify the content of documents needed for such classifications.
The regulation consists of two articles. Article 1 amends Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/12 by adding a subparagraph that specifies the particulars and documents required for requests for a ‘no MRL required’ classification for chemical-unlike biological substances. It refers to section I.7, first paragraph, points (a) to (e), of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/782. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and that it is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
The main provision of this act is the specification of the documents required for a ‘no MRL required’ classification for chemical-unlike biological substances. This means that applicants seeking this classification must now provide the particulars and documents outlined in section I.7, first paragraph, points (a) to (e), of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/782.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1105 of 3 June 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the classification of the substance ketoprofen with respect to its maximum residue limit in foodstuffs of animal origin
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1105 amends Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, focusing on the classification of ketoprofen regarding its maximum residue limits (MRLs) in animal-derived foodstuffs. The regulation updates the permitted levels of ketoprofen in various animal species, including ruminants, porcine animals, Equidae, and poultry, to ensure food safety standards are maintained.
The regulation consists of a preamble that outlines the reasoning and legal basis for the changes, followed by two articles and an annex. Article 1 specifies that the annex to Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 is amended as set out in the annex to this regulation. Article 2 states the regulation’s entry into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex replaces the existing entry for ketoprofen in Table 1 of Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 with updated MRLs for different animal species and tissues. It establishes specific MRLs for ketoprofen in muscle, fat, liver, kidney, and milk for all ruminants, porcine animals, and Equidae, and sets MRLs for poultry, excluding use in animals producing eggs for human consumption.
The most important provision of this regulation is the updated MRL values for ketoprofen in different animal species and tissues, as detailed in the annex. These values are critical for ensuring that the levels of ketoprofen in food products derived from these animals do not exceed safe limits for human consumption. The regulation also specifies that ketoprofen is not to be used in poultry producing eggs for human consumption, highlighting a specific restriction to protect public health.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1084 of 2 June 2025 entering a name in the Union register of geographical indications – Странджански билков чай / Strandzhanski bilkov chay (PDO)
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1084 officially registers ‘Странджански билков чай / Strandzhanski bilkov chay’ as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) in the Union register of geographical indications. This means the tea, derived from the Sideritis plant grown in the Strandzha mountain region of Bulgaria, is recognized for its unique qualities tied to its geographical origin and traditional production methods. The regulation addresses an initial opposition from Greece regarding the botanical nomenclature and incorporates amendments to the product specification and single document to clarify the plant’s genus. The regulation ensures legal protection for the name and sets out the conditions for its use, benefiting both producers and consumers by guaranteeing the authenticity and quality of the product.
The regulation consists of three articles and an annex.
* **Article 1** formally registers ‘Странджански билков чай / Strandzhanski bilkov chay’ as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO).
* **Article 2** specifies that the consolidated single document, containing details about the PDO, is set out in the Annex to the Regulation.
* **Article 3** states the regulation’s entry into force, which is twenty days following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The annex includes the single document, which provides a detailed description of the product, including its type, characteristics, specific production steps within the geographical area, rules for packaging and labeling, a definition of the geographical area, and the link between the area and the product’s quality.
Compared to previous versions, this regulation incorporates technical corrections to the product specification and single document, specifically clarifying the taxonomic nomenclature of the plant from which the tea is derived. The amendments address concerns raised by an opposition, ensuring the accuracy and clarity of the product’s description.
The most important provisions for its use are those that define the geographical area and the specific steps in production that must take place within that area to ensure the product qualifies for the PDO status. These provisions, along with the rules concerning packaging and labeling, are crucial for producers to adhere to in order to market their product under the protected name ‘Странджански билков чай / Strandzhanski bilkov chay’.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1086 of 2 June 2025 on the approval of a Union amendment to the product specification of the protected designation of origin Fiano di Avellino pursuant to of Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1086 approves a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Fiano di Avellino’. The amendment was requested by Italy and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Since no objections were received, the Commission has adopted this regulation to formally approve the changes.
The structure of the act is very simple. It consists of a preamble that explains the legal basis and the reasons for the regulation, followed by two articles. Article 1 approves the amendment to the product specification for ‘Fiano di Avellino’ PDO as published in the Official Journal. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal and confirms that the regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States. The act does not contain changes compared to previous versions, as it approves a specific amendment.
The most important provision of this act is Article 1, which formally approves the amendment to the product specification for the ‘Fiano di Avellino’ PDO. This means that the updated specification, as published in the Official Journal, is now the legally binding standard for wines produced under this PDO. Producers and stakeholders need to be aware of the specific changes included in the approved amendment to ensure compliance.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1087 of 2 June 2025 approving a Union amendment to the product specification of the protected geographical indication Chosco de Tineo pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1087 approves a Union amendment to the product specification for the protected geographical indication (PGI) ‘Chosco de Tineo’. This amendment was requested by Spain and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Since no objections were received, the amendment is now officially approved.
The structure of the act is very simple. It consists of a preamble outlining the legal basis and the reasons for the regulation, followed by two articles. Article 1 approves the amendment to the product specification for ‘Chosco de Tineo’ PGI. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and confirms that the regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States. This regulation repeals Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
The most important provision is Article 1, which formally approves the amendment to the product specification of the protected geographical indication ‘Chosco de Tineo’. This means that the updated specification is now the official standard for this product, and producers must adhere to it to use the PGI designation.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1075 of 2 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1927 as regards the list of demarcated areas for containment of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance)
Here’s a breakdown of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1075:
**1. Essence of the Act:**
This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1927, updating the list of demarcated areas established for the containment of *Aleurocanthus spiniferus* (spiny whitefly), a Union quarantine pest. The changes reflect the pest’s spread, making eradication impossible in certain regions, and adjusts buffer zones to include affected areas in both France and Italy.
**2. Structure and Main Provisions:**
* **Article 1:** This article is the core of the amendment. It replaces Annex I of the previous regulation (EU) 2022/1927 with a new annex, which details the updated demarcated areas.
* **Article 2:** Specifies the entry into force of the regulation, which is set for the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
* **Annex:** The new Annex I provides a detailed list of demarcated areas for containment in Greece, France, Croatia, and Italy. For each country, it lists:
* The number of the demarcated area.
* The zone type (infested zone or buffer zone).
* The region.
* Specific municipalities or other administrative/geographic delimitations that fall within the demarcated area.
**Changes Compared to Previous Versions:**
* The regulation acknowledges that eradication of *Aleurocanthus spiniferus* is no longer feasible in several areas previously designated for eradication efforts.
* It expands the demarcated areas for containment to include regions where the pest has become established.
* It adjusts the buffer zones to ensure they adequately cover areas at risk of infestation due to their proximity to infested zones, including cross-border areas between France and Italy.
**3. Main Provisions Important for Use:**
* **Demarcated Areas:** The most critical aspect is the detailed list of demarcated areas in the Annex. This list defines the geographical scope where specific containment measures apply. Businesses, landowners, and authorities in these regions need to be aware of these boundaries.
* **Infested vs. Buffer Zones:** Understanding the distinction between infested zones and buffer zones is crucial. Infested zones are areas where the pest is known to be present, requiring stricter control measures. Buffer zones are areas surrounding infested zones, designed to prevent further spread.
* **Specific Municipalities:** The regulation specifies the municipalities and, in some cases, even parts of municipalities that fall within the demarcated areas. This level of detail is essential for precise implementation of containment measures.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1076 of 2 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1372 as regards the period of application of the measures to prevent the entry into, the movement and spread within, the multiplication and release in the Union of Meloidogyne graminicola (Golden & Birchfield)
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1076 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1372, which establishes temporary measures to prevent the introduction, movement, spread, multiplication, and release of the *Meloidogyne graminicola* (rice root-knot nematode) within the Union. The amending regulation extends the period of application of these measures. The extension is based on the effectiveness of the existing measures and the need for continued monitoring to ensure the pest’s population remains under control, particularly in areas where it is already present.
The regulation consists of two articles. Article 1 amends Article 12 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1372 by extending the application of the temporary measures until 30 June 2026, replacing the original date of 30 June 2025. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and confirms that the regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
The most important provision of this regulation is the extension of the temporary measures against *Meloidogyne graminicola* until 30 June 2026. This extension ensures continued monitoring and control of the pest, which is currently only present in Italy within the Union. The extension allows for a more thorough evaluation of the measures’ effectiveness, which may lead to further revisions if necessary.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1092 of 2 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 to update the list of active substances approved or deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1092 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, which lists active substances approved or deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. The amendment involves updating the list by removing certain active substances for which renewal applications were not submitted or were withdrawn, and by modifying entries for other substances to reflect changes in their approval status.
The regulation is structured into two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this regulation. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex details the specific amendments to the list of approved active substances. These amendments include deletions of certain substances from both Part A and Part B of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as well as modifications to the entries for Trichoderma atroviride and Fatty acids C7 to C20 in Part A.
The most important provisions for users are the specific changes to the list of approved active substances. Specifically, several substances have been removed from the list, meaning that plant protection products containing these substances may no longer be authorized for use in the EU. Additionally, the modifications to the entries for Trichoderma atroviride and Fatty acids C7 to C20 reflect changes in the approved uses and specific provisions for these substances, which must be taken into account when authorizing plant protection products containing them.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1091 of 2 June 2025 correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as regards certain plants for planting of Prunus L., originating in Moldova
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1091 aims to correct an error in a previous amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, which concerns the import of certain plants for planting of the Prunus L. genus. The regulation re-introduces an exemption for specific Prunus species originating in Moldova, which was unintentionally omitted in a later amendment. This correction ensures the consistent application of import rules for these plants.
The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 is corrected in accordance with the Annex to this regulation. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex to the regulation replaces the entry for Prunus L. in the original regulation’s Annex, re-introducing the exemption for up to 2-year-old bare-rooted, free of leaves plants for planting of certain Prunus species originating in Moldova, with specific size restrictions.
The most important provision of this regulation is the correction made in the Annex, which specifically addresses the import of certain Prunus plants from Moldova. This correction ensures that the previously granted exemption for these plants is maintained, allowing their import into the Union under the specified conditions.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1080 of 2 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1659 as regards the time limit of the application of equivalent requirements for the introduction into the Union of fruits of Citrus sinensis Pers., originating from Israel in view of the risks posed by Thaumatotibia leucotreta
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1080 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1659, which sets out equivalent requirements for the import of Citrus sinensis fruits from Israel into the EU, concerning the pest Thaumatotibia leucotreta. The new regulation removes the previous time limit on the application of these equivalent requirements, effectively making them permanent. This decision is based on the absence of non-compliance notifications and a positive audit conducted by the Commission services in Israel.
The structure of the act is straightforward. It consists of a preamble that outlines the reasons for the amendment, followed by two articles. Article 1 replaces Article 4 of the original Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1659, removing the expiration date. Article 2 specifies the date of entry into force of the amending regulation. The main change is the removal of the expiration date for the equivalent requirements for importing Citrus sinensis fruits from Israel, initially set to expire on May 31, 2025.
The most important provision is the removal of the time limit for the application of the equivalent requirements. This means that the conditions under which Citrus sinensis fruits from Israel can be imported into the EU, as an alternative to the standard requirements in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072, will continue indefinitely, provided that Israel maintains satisfactory controls and compliance regarding the specified pest.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1088 of 2 June 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as regards certain plants for planting of Alnus cordata, Alnus glutinosa and Alnus incana originating in the United Kingdom and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213 as regards the phytosanitary measures for the introduction of those plants for planting into the Union territory
This is a description of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1088.
**Essence of the Act:**
The regulation amends two previous implementing regulations (EU) 2018/2019 and (EU) 2020/1213 regarding the import of certain Alnus plants (Alder) from the United Kingdom into the European Union. It removes specific Alnus plants (cordata, glutinosa, and incana) originating in the UK from the list of high-risk plants, subject to certain conditions. However, it also introduces phytosanitary measures to address the risk of the pest *Phytophthora siskiyouensis* related to these plants, until a complete risk assessment is carried out.
**Structure and Main Provisions:**
The regulation consists of 3 articles and 2 annexes:
* **Article 1:** Amends the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, modifying the entry for *Alnus Mill.* to exclude specific types of *Alnus cordata, Alnus glutinosa,* and *Alnus incana* originating in the United Kingdom from being considered high-risk plants.
* **Article 2:** Amends the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213 by adding an entry for the specified *Alnus* plants from the UK, subjecting them to specific phytosanitary measures.
* **Article 3:** Specifies the date of entry into force of the regulation.
* **Annex I:** Details the amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, specifically removing certain *Alnus* plants from the high-risk list.
* **Annex II:** Details the amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213, outlining the phytosanitary measures required for the import of the specified *Alnus* plants from the UK. These measures include official statements regarding freedom from *Phytophthora siskiyouensis*, site registration and supervision, disinfection protocols, and official inspections with sampling and testing.
**Main Provisions for Practical Use:**
The most important provisions for those involved in the import of *Alnus* plants from the UK are:
1. **Removal from High-Risk List (Partial):** Certain *Alnus* plants (*Alnus cordata, Alnus glutinosa,* and *Alnus incana*) from the UK are no longer considered high-risk, provided they meet specific criteria (age, type, diameter).
2. **Phytosanitary Measures:** These *Alnus* plants are now subject to specific measures under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213, focusing on the pest *Phytophthora siskiyouensis*.
3. **Documentation Requirements:** Importers must ensure that the plants are accompanied by an official statement confirming freedom from *Phytophthora siskiyouensis*, details of site registration and supervision, and confirmation of disinfection protocols. The phytosanitary certificates must include specific statements and site of production details.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1082 of 2 June 2025 establishing a derogation from Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 concerning the introduction into the Union territory of unrooted cuttings for planting of Calibrachoa spp., Petunia spp. and their hybrids from Kenya
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1082 introduces a temporary derogation from the existing prohibitions on importing certain plants from Kenya into the European Union. Specifically, it allows the import of unrooted cuttings of *Calibrachoa spp.*, *Petunia spp.*, and their hybrids from Kenya, which was previously prohibited. This derogation is subject to strict conditions aimed at preventing the introduction and spread of specific plant pests.
The regulation consists of 5 articles and 2 annexes.
* **Article 1** provides definitions for ‘specified pests’ and ‘specified plants’ relevant to the regulation.
* **Article 2** establishes the derogation, allowing the import of specified plants from Kenya, provided the requirements in Article 3 are met.
* **Article 3** outlines the detailed requirements for the introduction and movement of these plants within the EU, including obligations for the Kenyan National Plant Protection Organisation (NPPO), importers, and professional operators within the EU.
* **Article 4** amends Annex VI to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 to reflect this derogation.
* **Article 5** specifies the regulation’s entry into force and its period of application, which is until April 30, 2028.
**Annex I** details the specific requirements for the introduction of specified plants into the Union territory, including production site conditions, plant production processes, pre-export inspections, and phytosanitary certification. **Annex II** provides the amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072.
The most important provisions for practical use are in Article 3 and Annex I, which detail the specific obligations and conditions that must be met by the Kenyan NPPO, EU importers, and professional operators to ensure compliance with the regulation and prevent the introduction of plant pests. These include requirements for approved production sites, pest monitoring, inspections, and traceability.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1078 of 2 June 2025 establishing a derogation from Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 concerning the introduction into the Union territory of unrooted cuttings for planting of Calibrachoa spp., Petunia spp. and their hybrids from Guatemala
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1078 introduces a temporary derogation from the general prohibition on importing plants for planting from the Solanaceae family, specifically allowing the import of unrooted cuttings of Calibrachoa spp., Petunia spp., and their hybrids from Guatemala into the European Union. This derogation is subject to strict phytosanitary requirements aimed at preventing the introduction and spread of specific pests. The regulation aims to balance the interests of Member States in importing these plants with the need to protect the EU’s plant health.
The structure of the act is as follows:
* **Article 1** defines the terms ‘specified pests’ and ‘specified plants’ to provide clarity on the scope of the regulation.
* **Article 2** establishes the derogation from the prohibition, allowing the introduction of specified plants from Guatemala under specific conditions.
* **Article 3** outlines the requirements for the introduction and movement of specified plants within the Union, including obligations for the NPPO of Guatemala, importing professional operators, and professional operators receiving the plants.
* **Article 4** amends Annex VI to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 to reflect the derogation.
* **Article 5** specifies the entry into force and application period of the regulation, which is until 30 April 2028.
* **Annex I** details the specific requirements for the introduction of specified plants into the Union territory, including production site conditions, plant production requirements, and phytosanitary certification.
* **Annex II** provides the amendment to Annex VI of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072.
The main provisions of the act that may be the most important for its use are:
* **Requirements for Guatemalan NPPO:** The National Plant Protection Organisation (NPPO) of Guatemala must communicate a list of measures to ensure compliance with the regulation and submit a list of approved production sites annually. They must also provide an annual report on activities related to the production and export of these plants.
* **Obligations for Importers:** Importers must present a document from the competent authority confirming that the plants will be moved to premises of professional operators authorized to issue plant passports or to operators for whom the competent authorities issue the plant passports.
* **Restrictions on Movement:** Once in the EU, the plants can only be moved to premises of professional operators authorized to issue plant passports or those for whom the competent authorities issue the plant passports. These operators must inform the authorities of the arrival date and keep the traceability code.
* **Official Inspections and Testing:** Plants must be kept separate from other susceptible plants and undergo official inspections, including molecular testing for specific viruses.
* **Actions in Case of Pest Findings:** If specified pests are found, the affected plants must be destroyed, and the premises may need to be cleaned and disinfected. The Commission and other Member States must be notified, and the Guatemalan NPPO will be informed, potentially leading to the removal of the production site from the approved list.
* **Phytosanitary Certificate Requirements:** Each consignment must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate with specific declarations, including the name and traceability code of the approved production site and a statement of compliance with the regulation.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1101 of 3 June 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2018/782 concerning the assessment by the European Medicines Agency of maximum residue limits for chemical-unlike biological substances
This Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1101 amends Regulation (EU) 2018/782, focusing on how the European Medicines Agency (EMA) assesses maximum residue limits (MRLs) for biological substances that are unlike chemicals in food-producing animals. The amendment refines the evaluation process for these substances, potentially classifying them as “no MRL required” if they pose no public health risk, aligning with existing regulations on pharmacologically active substances. This aims to streamline the assessment process, focusing on substances that genuinely require MRL evaluations to ensure food safety.
The regulation consists of a preamble that outlines the reasons for the amendment and two articles. Article 1 contains the core amendment, replacing a paragraph in Section I.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/782. This change directs the EMA to determine whether a “no MRL required” classification is appropriate for chemical-unlike biological substances, based on EMA’s guidance and the classification provided under Article 14(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 470/2009. Article 2 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and confirms that it is binding and directly applicable in all Member States.
The most important provision of this regulation is the amendment to Section I.7 of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/782. This change empowers the EMA to classify certain chemical-unlike biological substances as “no MRL required” if they are deemed safe. This classification can prevent unnecessary full MRL evaluations, reducing the regulatory burden and focusing resources on substances that pose a potential risk to public health.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1090 of 2 June 2025 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and 1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-one (NEP)
This Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1090 amends Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) regarding restrictions on N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and 1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-one (NEP). It aims to protect workers from the health risks associated with exposure to these substances by setting strict limits on their use and concentration in various industrial and professional settings. The regulation introduces new entries to Annex XVII of REACH, specifically addressing DMAC and NEP.
The regulation adds two new entries, 80 and 81, to Annex XVII of REACH, addressing DMAC and NEP, respectively. Each entry includes two main paragraphs: The first paragraph restricts the placing on the market of DMAC and NEP as substances on their own, as constituents of other substances, or in mixtures at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.3% after December 23, 2026, unless specific Derived No-Effect Levels (DNELs) are included in the chemical safety reports and safety data sheets. These DNELs are set for long-term exposure by inhalation and dermal exposure for workers. The second paragraph restricts the manufacture or use of DMAC and NEP as substances on their own, as constituents of other substances, or in mixtures at concentrations equal to or greater than 0.3% after December 23, 2026, unless manufacturers and downstream users implement appropriate risk management measures and operational conditions to ensure worker exposure remains below the DNELs specified in paragraph 1. For DMAC, there is a derogation in paragraph 3, which extends the application deadline to June 23, 2029, for its use as a solvent in the production of man-made fibers. This allows the industry more time to implement necessary risk reduction technologies.
The most important provisions for stakeholders are the specific DNELs set for both substances and the deadlines for compliance. For DMAC, the DNELs are 13 mg/m3 for long-term inhalation exposure and 1.8 mg/kg bw/day for long-term dermal exposure. For NEP, the DNELs are 4.0 mg/m3 for long-term inhalation exposure and 2.4 mg/kg bw/day for long-term dermal exposure. Companies must ensure that their chemical safety reports and safety data sheets include these DNELs by December 23, 2026, and that worker exposure is below these levels. The derogation for DMAC in man-made fiber production provides additional time for that specific sector to comply.
Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 3 juin 2025.#OB contre Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bologna.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Contrôles aux frontières, asile et immigration – Directive 2002/90/CE – Infraction générale d’aide à l’entrée, au transit et au séjour irréguliers – Article 1er, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Interprétation conforme à la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 7 – Respect de la vie privée et familiale – Article 24 – Droits de l’enfant – Article 52, paragraphe 1 – Atteinte au contenu essentiel des droits fondamentaux – Article 18 – Droit d’asile – Personne faisant entrer irrégulièrement sur le territoire d’un État membre des mineurs ressortissants de pays tiers qui l’accompagnent et à l’égard desquels elle exerce la garde effective.#Affaire C-460/23.
This is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) concerning the interpretation of the Council Directive 2002/90/CE on defining the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence. The case originates from a request for a preliminary ruling by an Italian court, Tribunale di Bologna, in a criminal proceeding against OB, a third-country national, for assisting the irregular entry into Italy of two minor third-country nationals whom she was accompanying and for whom she had effective custody.
The judgment addresses whether Article 1(1)(a) of Directive 2002/90/CE, which requires Member States to impose sanctions against anyone who intentionally assists a person who is not a national of a Member State to enter or transit through a Member State in violation of that State’s laws on the entry or transit of aliens, should be interpreted in light of Articles 7 (respect for private and family life), 18 (right to asylum), and 24 (rights of the child) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
The Court rules that Article 1(1)(a) of Directive 2002/90/CE, read in light of Articles 7, 24, and 52(1) of the Charter, must be interpreted as meaning that the conduct of a person who, in violation of the rules on the crossing of borders by persons, brings minor third-country nationals into the territory of a Member State, where those minors are accompanying that person and are under their effective custody, does not fall within the scope of the general offence of facilitating irregular entry. Furthermore, these articles preclude national legislation that criminally punishes such conduct.
The main takeaway from this judgment is that it clarifies the scope of the offense of facilitating irregular entry, ensuring that individuals who are acting to protect and care for minors under their custody are not criminalized for actions that would otherwise be considered facilitating irregular immigration. The Court emphasizes the importance of considering the fundamental rights of family life and the rights of the child when interpreting and applying EU legislation on immigration.
Decision No 2/2024 of the EU-Armenia Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications of 18 October 2024 amending Annex X to the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part [2025/1104]
This document is Decision No. 2/2024 of the EU-Armenia Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications, which amends Annex X to the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Armenia. The decision updates the list of protected geographical indications for products from both the EU and Armenia, ensuring that these products are legally protected against imitation or misuse in both territories. This update aims to strengthen trade relations and protect the intellectual property rights of producers in the EU and Armenia.
The act consists of a preamble, two articles, and an annex. The preamble outlines the legal basis for the decision, referencing Article 240(3)(c) of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement and noting the completion of the necessary objection procedure and examination of new geographical indications.
* **Article 1** states that Annex X of the Agreement is replaced entirely by the text provided in the Annex to this Decision.
* **Article 2** specifies that the decision comes into force on the date of its adoption.
The Annex itself contains the updated list of protected geographical indications, divided into two parts:
* **Part A** lists geographical indications of products from the European Union, including aromatized wines, agricultural products, and foodstuffs other than wines and spirit drinks. For each product, the list includes the Member State of origin, the name to be protected, the type of product (PDO/PGI), the type of product, and the transcription of the name into Armenian characters.
* **Part B** lists geographical indications of products from the Republic of Armenia, including the name of the product, its transcription in Latin characters, and the type of product.
The most important provisions for users of this act are the updated lists of protected geographical indications in the Annex. These lists define which product names are legally protected in the EU and Armenia, providing clarity for producers, traders, and consumers. The inclusion of Armenian transcriptions for EU products and Latin transcriptions for Armenian products also facilitates recognition and enforcement of these protections in both regions. ****
