Here is the translation of the legal text summary:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the illegal state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” for a non-residential premises previously owned by the state.
2. Main Court Arguments:
– Corporatization of a state enterprise is not privatization
– Transfer of property to the authorized capital does not change the form of ownership
– State property remains state-owned, even after the creation of a joint-stock company
– Alienation of such property is possible only through privatization
3. Court Decision: The prosecutor’s claim was satisfied – the state registration of private ownership rights by JSC “Ukrposhta” was canceled and ownership rights were recognized for the state.
: The court deviated from previous judicial practice regarding the change of state property ownership form.
