Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 757/9335/18-c dated 05/03/2025

Subject of the Dispute: Claim by PERSON_1 against PJSC “Terra Bank” on consumer rights protection.

Main Arguments of the Court: The Supreme Court established that the courts of previous instances incorrectly closed the proceedings in the case, as they did not investigate the circumstances of legal succession of PJSC “Terra Bank”. In particular, it was established that PJSC “Transitional Bank ‘Crystalbank'” is the legal successor of PJSC “Terra Bank” in terms of assets and liabilities, as evidenced by the transfer and acceptance act dated December 22, 2014. The courts of previous instances did not verify these circumstances and prematurely closed the proceedings.

Court Decision: The Supreme Court revoked the ruling of the Pechersk District Court and the resolution of the Kyiv Court of Appeal, referring the case for a new review to the court of first instance.

Full text by link

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.