Subject of Dispute: Recovery from PrivatBank of the deposit amount and accrued interest under a contract that the bank refuses to execute.
Main Court Arguments:
1. The bank received a statement from the client about terminating the deposit agreement and returning funds, but did not fulfill its obligations.
2. The client did not consent to the transfer of debt to another financial company, therefore PrivatBank remains responsible for the contract.
3. The court confirmed previous judicial practice regarding the impossibility of changing the debtor without explicit written consent from the client.
Court Decision: To uphold the previous court decisions on recovering the deposit amount and interest from PrivatBank in favor of the client.
