Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor’s Office sought to recover a land plot of 0.7483 hectares from LLC “A.T.K.”, which was illegally withdrawn from state ownership contrary to the land conservation decision.
2. Main Court Arguments:
– The land plot was part of degraded lands subject to conservation through afforestation
– The State Geocadaster order on transferring the plot to private ownership was adopted with legislative violations
– The Court indicated that claims against LLC “A.T.K.” should be considered in economic, not civil court proceedings
3. Court Decision: To leave unchanged the appellate court resolution on closing proceedings regarding the claim against LLC “A.T.K.” and refer the case to the economic court.
