Subject of the dispute: Deprivation of parental rights of PERSON_3, PERSON_4, and PERSON_5 regarding their minor children PERSON_1 and PERSON_2.
Main arguments of the court:
1. Parents systematically evaded parental responsibilities, children lived in unsatisfactory conditions, the mother used narcotic substances.
2. The Children’s Services repeatedly conducted preventive work, but the parents did not change their behavior.
3. The court noted that mere objections by parents against deprivation of parental rights are not sufficient grounds for rejecting the claim.
Court decision: Revoke previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for a complete and comprehensive investigation of the case circumstances.
