Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the city council’s decision to grant a land plot to a third party, contrary to the plaintiff’s previously submitted application.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The city council violated the procedure for reviewing the land application by not bringing it to the session
– The court decision obligated consideration of the plaintiff’s application, but this was not done
– The court emphasized that the person who first began the land plot formation has priority right to obtain it
– The city council’s decision was made in violation of legislation and infringes upon the plaintiff’s rights
3. Court Decision: Leave the cassation appeal unsatisfied, keep the appellate court’s resolution unchanged, thereby supporting the plaintiff.
