Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Pension Fund’s inaction as unlawful regarding non-accrual of pension supplement to a minor child residing in a radioactively contaminated territory.
2. Key Court Arguments:
– Minor children receiving survivor’s pension are considered non-working pensioners
– The Chornobyl Disaster Law does not limit the right to supplement based on age or pension type
– Children cannot independently choose their place of residence, therefore parents’ residence is taken into account
– The court deviates from previous practice that did not recognize minors’ right to such supplement
3. Court Decision: Partially satisfy the claim and oblige the Pension Fund to accrue a pension supplement to the minor child in the amount of two subsistence minimums.
