Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Resolution of the State Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety on Imposing an Administrative and Economic Fine on an Individual Entrepreneur for Improper Execution of a Waybill.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The Supreme Court changed its previous position regarding the interpretation of legislation on transportation.
2. The Court considers that deficiencies in the execution of a waybill may be regarded as its absence.
3. The courts of previous instances did not fully investigate all circumstances of the case, in particular the video recording of the inspection and various versions of the waybill.
Court Decision: To cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to the court of first instance for a complete clarification of all circumstances of the case.
