Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Invalidation of the land plot exchange agreement dated March 14, 2008 between PERSON_2 and PERSON_3.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The plaintiff PERSON_1 did not prove violation of her rights at the time of concluding the exchange agreement in 2008
– The fact that the parties did not immediately register ownership rights to the land plots does not indicate a simulated transaction
– The agreement was notarized, the parties were capable, and their intentions were verified
3. Court Decision: The Supreme Court canceled the appellate court’s decision and referred the case for a new review due to procedural violations in the restoration of the term for appellate appeal.
