Subject of Dispute: The Prosecutor challenges the city council’s inaction regarding improper placement of temporary structures for entrepreneurial activities.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. Compliance with the procedure for placing temporary structures constitutes a public interest of the territorial community.
2. If a local self-government body violates state interests, the prosecutor has the right to appeal to the court.
3. In this case, there is no other body that can protect state interests, except for the prosecutor’s office.
Court Decision: To cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new review to the court of first instance.
