Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 140/415/20 dated 20/03/2025

Subject of the dispute: Recovery of damages caused by an unconstitutional law that taxed pensions above a certain amount.

Main arguments of the court: The Supreme Court revealed significant procedural violations in previous court decisions. First, the courts did not clarify whether the wording of the law before 2016 was indeed unconstitutional. Second, the courts did not establish the proper defendant – the state must be represented by the relevant authority that directly caused the damage. Moreover, the courts did not fully investigate all the circumstances of the case and evidence.

Court decision: To cancel previous court decisions and refer the case for a new hearing to establish all circumstances and determine the proper defendant.

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.