Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging disciplinary orders and dismissal of a police officer from service.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– Legislation establishes a special 15-day period for appealing disciplinary penalties for police officers during martial law.
– The plaintiff missed the established period for appealing orders by applying to the court a month after receiving the orders.
– The court indicated that the special law (Disciplinary Statute) takes precedence over general procedural legislation.
– Previous instances incorrectly applied procedural norms regarding consideration of the application for term restoration.
3. Court Decision: Rescind the decisions of previous instances and refer the case for new consideration to the court of first instance for further examination.