Here is the translation of the legal analysis:
1. Subject of Dispute: Reconstruction of an apartment by the defendant in a multi-apartment building without permission from other co-owners and without state registration.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
– The defendant carried out apartment reconstruction extending beyond its original volume, interfering with the building’s load-bearing structures without consent from other co-owners
– State registration of ownership rights to the reconstructed apartment occurred with legislative violations
– Expert examination confirmed technical feasibility of reconstruction, but did not cancel the requirement to obtain necessary permits
3. Court Decision: Obligate the defendant to restore the apartment and garage to their previous dimensions, as fixed in technical documentation, at their own expense.
Note: The court deviated from previous practice, clearly defining that state registration does not legalize unauthorized construction.
