Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    ↵
    Open chat icon

    Review of the EU legislation for 09/09/2026

    As you have not provided the specific list of legal acts in your message, I am currently unable to generate the analysis. Please provide the titles or summaries of the legislation you wish for me to review, and I will proceed with the analysis immediately in accordance with your requirements.

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1975 of 8 September 2026 authorising an exemption pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/573 of the European Parliament and of the Council, with regards to the use of fluorinated greenhouse gases in certain equipment used for drying compressed air


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1976 of 8 September 2026 renewing the approval of the active substance pyraclostrobin in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1974 of 8 September 2026 granting a Union authorisation for the single biocidal product ERO MN in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/2017 of 2 September 2026 on the registration of the geographical indication Brânză frământată de Teaca (PGI) in the Union register of geographical indications pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1143 of the European Parliament and of the Council


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1968 of 7 September 2026 renewing the approval of the active substance phosphine in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2026.BX v Statul Român – Ministerul Finanţelor Publice and Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 – Article 20(1) – Identification system for agricultural parcels – Effective administration and control – Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 – Article 68 – Obligation on the farmer correctly to declare the areas and identify the parcel used and its boundaries – Reductions and exclusions in cases of overdeclaration – Exceptions – Concept of ‘factually correct information’ – State liability for loss or damage caused to individuals by the infringement of EU law – Infringement attributable to a national court ruling at last instance – No provision intended to confer rights on individuals.Case C-163/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2026.João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito e.a. v Estado português.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directives 77/187/EEC and 2001/23/EC – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Article 1(1) and Article 3(1) – Obligation to make a request for a preliminary ruling under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU – Member State liability for harm caused to individuals by breaches of EU law attributable to that Member State – Breaches attributable to a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law – Taking into consideration the case-law of the Court extant at the time of delivery of the decision of that national court or tribunal which allegedly caused that harm.Case C-293/24.


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 September 2026.Inter IKEA Systems BV v Algemeen Vlaams Belang VZW and Others.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2)(c) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10(2)(c) – Article 10(6) – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Concept of ‘use in the course of trade, in relation to goods or services, of a sign’ – Concept of ‘due cause’ – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Striking of a balance between fundamental rights – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expression – Article 17 of that charter – Right to property – Right of the proprietor of a trade mark with a reputation to prevent use by a third party of a sign identical with, or similar to, a trade mark – Use of such a sign by the third party in the context of a political campaign.Case C-298/23.


    Agreement, in the form of an exchange of letters, amending and supplementing the Agreement for Scientific and Technological Cooperation between the European Union and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA)

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.