Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/3118 of 10 December 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid in the agriculture sector

This Regulation amends the rules for de minimis state aid in the agricultural sector of the EU. It increases the ceiling for aid that a single undertaking may receive to EUR 50,000 over any 3-year period and extends the validity of the regulation until December 31, 2032. The national caps for cumulative aid are set…

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3173 of 27 August 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/988 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2023/988 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules on access to and operation of the Safety Gate Rapid Alert System, information to be entered in that System, notification requirements and the criteria for assessment of the level of risk

This Commission Delegated Regulation supplements Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on general product safety by establishing detailed rules for the operation of the Safety Gate Rapid Alert System. It sets requirements for notifications about dangerous products, criteria for risk assessment, and rules for information exchange between Member States through this system.The regulation consists of 3 main articles…

CASE OF DYUMIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

This judgment concerns multiple applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The Court joined six applications due to their similar subject matter, examining complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.The Court found violations regarding poor detention conditions in the Kyiv Pre-Trial Detention Facility, where applicants were held…

CASE OF RASKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment concerning nine applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The case involves multiple applicants who were detained in various Ukrainian detention facilities, including pre-trial detention centers in Kharkiv and Kropyvnytskyy, and the Zamkova Detention Facility.The Court found violations of…

CASE OF SHYNKARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

This judgment concerns seven applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention in all cases.The Court examined complaints from seven applicants who were detained in the Zhytomyr Detention Facility under poor conditions. The…

CASE OF BONDARENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Bondarenko and Others v. Ukraine, concerning seven applications filed by Ukrainian citizens regarding inadequate conditions of detention in the Kryvyi Rih Detention Facility and the lack of effective remedies to address these issues. The Court found violations of Articles 3 and…

CASE OF DIDYK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment in the case of Didyk and Others v. Ukraine, which consolidated nine applications concerning inadequate detention conditions in Ukrainian detention facilities, particularly in the Zhytomyr Detention Facility.The Court found violations of Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and 13 (right to an effective…

CASE OF LUTSAK AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment concerning 11 applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The case primarily deals with violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.The Court found that all applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions in the Vinnytsia Detention…

CASE OF KONONENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

This judgment concerns multiple applications against Ukraine regarding inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies. The Court examined ten applications jointly due to their similar subject matter. The Court found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning poor detention conditions in Ukrainian facilities, particularly in the Dnipro Detention Facility. The…

CASE OF NYCHYPORENKO AND DEMIDOVA v. UKRAINE

The case concerns complaints by two Ukrainian citizens, Kateryna Nychyporenko and Svitlana Demidova, regarding ineffective investigations into cases of ill-treatment inflicted by private individuals. Both applicants suffered physical injuries from assaults by their neighbors, and both cases demonstrated significant failures in the investigation and judicial processes.The Court found violations of Article 3 of the Convention…

CASE OF SAPITASH AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a judgment concerning three Ukrainian citizens who complained about disproportionate sanctions in customs cases. The applicants were fined and had their undeclared cash confiscated at Ukrainian border crossings for exceeding permitted limits without declaration.The Court found that there was a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.…
E-mail
Password
Confirm Password