December 5, 2018, and the three-year period for filing an application for review based on newly discovered circumstances ended on December 5, 2021; since the application was submitted in July 2024.
Appeal Against the Inaction of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ) Regarding the Non-Consideration of Judge PERSON_1's Application for the Dismissal of Commission Member PERSON_2 Due to Gross Negligence of Duties.
2. The parties in the case were Judge PERSON_1, who believed that the HQCJ violated her rights by not properly considering her…
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, recognition of its inaction as unlawful, and obligation of the Commission to perform certain actions.
The parties in the case were the plaintiff, INDIVIDUAL_1, who demanded the annulment of the Commission's acts and to compel it to act, and the defendant, the Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine,…
The subject of the dispute was the **nullification of the results of a state procurement and the contract for the capital repair of a military canteen** in the city of Poltava.
The prosecution, in the interest of the **Ministry of Defense of Ukraine**, claimed that the procurement was conducted **with violations**, while the defendants — the…
Appeal Against the Decree of the President of Ukraine on the Application of Sanctions Against INDIVIDUAL_1. The parties in the case were INDIVIDUAL_1, who contested the legality of the sanctions applied to him, and President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, who defended the legitimacy of his decree.
The court of first instance left the lawsuit without consideration…
1. **Subject of the dispute** is the recognition and annulment of the Decree of the President of Ukraine on the imposition of sanctions against INDIVIDUAL_1.
2. **Parties to the case** are the plaintiff, a citizen of the Republic of Cyprus, who seeks the annulment of the sanctions, and the defendants – the President of Ukraine and…
