Essence of the decision: The European Court of Human Rights ruled on the case Martyrosyan v. Ukraine concerning excessive pre-trial detention length. The Court found that Ukraine violated Article 5 § 3 of the Convention by keeping the applicant in pre-trial detention for 3 years, 5 months, and 13 days without sufficient justification. The Court awarded…

1. Essence of the decision: The European Court of Human Rights found Ukraine violated Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention regarding the death of a young man in police custody in 2010. The Court determined that Ukraine failed to conduct an effective investigation into the death and ill-treatment of the victim, and failed to provide…

1. Essence of the decision: The European Court of Human Rights ruled in the case of Bilyy v. Ukraine concerning the ill-treatment of the applicant by police convoy officers in 2016, when he sustained a head injury while consulting case files on court premises. The Court found Ukraine in violation of Article 3 of the Convention…

Here's a detailed analysis of the ECHR decision in Ishkhanyan v. Armenia: 1. Essence of the decision in 3-5 sentences: - The case concerns the unlawful arrest and detention of a participant in a peaceful protest in Yerevan against electricity price increases. The Court found that the applicant's arrest after the dispersal of a sit-in demonstration…

Here's a detailed analysis of the ECHR decision in Denysyuk and Others v. Ukraine: 1. Essence of the decision in 3-5 sentences: - The case concerns violations of Article 8 of the Convention (right to respect for private life and correspondence) regarding covert surveillance measures applied to four Ukrainian nationals. The Court found that the interference…

The judgment concerns the prosecution of media organizations and individuals in Russia for expressing views critical of Russia's military actions in Ukraine or disseminating information that diverged from official accounts. The Court examined 161 applications from media outlets and individuals who faced various forms of sanctions, including fines, detention, and closure of media organizations, for…

The judgment concerns the prosecution of media organizations and individuals in Russia for expressing views critical of Russia's military actions in Ukraine or disseminating information that diverged from official accounts. The Court examined 161 applications from media outlets and individuals who faced various forms of sanctions, including fines, detention, and closure of media organizations, for…