CASE OF BRD - GROUPE SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE S.A. v. ROMANIA
Let me provide a detailed analysis of this European Court of Human Rights decision.
1. Essence of the decision in 3-5 sentences:
The case concerns complaints by BRD - Groupe Société Générale bank against Romania regarding two types of searches conducted on its premises: an unannounced inspection…
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
CASE OF F.S.M. v. SPAIN
Here's a detailed analysis of the European Court of Human Rights decision in F.S.M. v. Spain:
1. Essence of the decision (3-5 sentences):
The case concerns the criminal conviction of an elderly person with cognitive impairment for tax-related offenses. The Court examined whether the applicant's mental health condition required special procedural adjustments…
Essence of the decision (3-5 sentences):
The case concerns a Ukrainian editor-in-chief who was ordered to retract statements published about Ukrexpert, an association providing industrial safety services. The European Court of Human Rights found that Ukraine violated Article 10 (freedom of expression) when domestic courts ordered the applicant to retract his statements without proper justification. The…
1. Essence of the decision:
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on a case involving two Ukrainian activists who were prevented from holding demonstrations near the Prosecutor General's Office in Kyiv in 2013. The Court found violations of Article 11 (freedom of assembly) and Article 13 (right to effective remedy) of the Convention for both…
1. Essence of the decision in 3-5 sentences:
The case concerns the mass disorder and fire in Odesa on May 2, 2014, which resulted in 48 deaths and numerous injuries. The Court found that Ukraine violated Article 2 of the Convention by failing to prevent and stop the violence, ensure timely rescue measures, and conduct an…
No new decisions were published today
CASE OF AMIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
Here's a detailed analysis of the ECHR decision in Amirov v. Azerbaijan:
1. Essence of the decision in 3-5 sentences:
The case concerns unlawful pre-trial detention of an Azerbaijani opposition party member and newspaper financial director who was arrested in 2016 on charges related to alleged connections with the Gülen movement. The…
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
No new decisions were published today
CASE OF GORŠE v. SLOVENIA
Here's a detailed analysis of the ECHR decision in Gorše v. Slovenia:
1. Essence of the decision (3-5 sentences):
The case concerns criminal proceedings where the applicant was convicted of abuse of office and money laundering by a judge who had previously accepted guilty pleas from two co-defendants for aiding and conspiring…
The essence of the decision:
The European Court of Human Rights examined multiple applications against Russia concerning the "foreign agent" legislation. The Court found that Russia's practice of designating individuals and organizations as "foreign agents" violated Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 8 (right to private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The…
Here's the analysis of the ECtHR decision in Yegorov and Others v. Russia:
Essence of the decision:
The case concerns multiple applications against Russia regarding violations of freedom of expression, particularly related to calls for participation in public events and protests. The Court found violations of Article 10 of the Convention in all cases, where applicants were…
Essence of the decision:
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on 11 consolidated cases against Ukraine concerning inadequate detention conditions in various Ukrainian detention facilities. The Court found violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention regarding poor detention conditions and lack of effective remedies. The cases involved multiple applicants who were held…
Essence of the decision:
The European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of Mr. Tokar, a Ukrainian citizen who was denied an international passport due to allegedly inaccurate data in the police database about criminal proceedings against him from 1997. The Court found violations of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement) and…
