Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Case No. 760/17947/23 dated 12/03/2025

    Subject of the dispute: Recovery of debt under a credit agreement from an individual by a bank.

    Main arguments of the court: The Supreme Court considers that the appellate court prematurely refused to open appellate proceedings, since the lawyer’s powers were confirmed by a legal assistance agreement and a certificate of the right to practice law. The court also noted that the party to the case (the defendant) has the right to personally eliminate the deficiencies of the appellate complaint, regardless of the fact that the complaint was filed by their representative.

    Court decision: The cassation complaint was satisfied, the appellate court’s ruling was revoked, and the case was referred back to the appellate court for further consideration.

    Full text by link

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.