Subject of Dispute: Official Misconduct by a State Executor in the Forced Sale of Real Estate Belonging to the State Institution “Ukrvodgeo”.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The Supreme Court found that the appellate court improperly verified the evidence regarding the actions of the state executor PERSON_6, who prepared documents for the sale of the state institution’s property.
2. The court noted that the appellate court did not provide clear motives for its decision and allowed contradictions in the grounds for acquitting the defendant.
3. The Supreme Court believes that the actions of the state executor could lead to the illegal alienation of real estate from state ownership.
Court Decision: To cancel the ruling of the Kharkiv Appellate Court and assign a new review of the case in the appellate instance.
