Subject of Dispute: Removal of Obstacles in Using Residential Premises and Settling the Former Husband into a House Belonging to His Former Wife.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. Plaintiff PERSON_1 was settled into the house on legal grounds as a family member of the owner, and therefore has the right to use the housing even after the termination of marital relations.
2. The fact of hindering the plaintiff’s use of housing is confirmed by police reports and a deputy’s act.
3. The Supreme Court revealed procedural violations in the appellate court’s decision, in particular, improper assessment of PERSON_3’s arguments regarding the violation of his rights.
Court Decision: Revoke the appellate court’s resolution and refer the case for a new review.
Note: The court drew attention to the need to maintain a balance of interests of all dispute participants when resolving housing issues.
