Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging the Inaction of the Pension Fund Regarding Incorrect Pension Indexation.
2. Key Arguments of the Court:
The court established a fundamental difference between the norms of law and subordinate legal act regarding pension indexation. In particular, Procedure No. 124 provides for increasing the average salary indicator as of October 1, 2017, while the law requires increasing the indicator directly used in pension assignment. The court emphasized the priority of law over a subordinate legal act and the necessity of applying norms that correspond to the principles of social justice and the rule of law.
3. Court Decision: Satisfy the claim, cancel the decision of the appellate court, and oblige the Pension Fund to conduct correct pension indexation taking into account the average salary indicator directly used in pension assignment.
