Subject of Dispute: Recovery of Inflation Losses and 3% Per Annum under a Natural Gas Supply Agreement, the Terms of Which Were Modified by a Settlement Agreement.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. A settlement agreement at the stage of executing a court decision is a legal act that changes the terms of monetary obligation performance.
2. The court confirmed the previous legal position that inflation losses and 3% per annum are accrued only if the payment schedule established by the settlement agreement is violated.
3. The plaintiff did not prove that the defendant violated the payment schedule provided by the settlement agreement.
Court Decision: To leave the cassation appeal without satisfaction, the appellate court ruling – unchanged.
