The court, in rendering its decision, was guided by the fact that the High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) considered the issue of including the judge’s application in the agenda of the plenary session, but the commission members voted against its inclusion. The court noted that to recognize inaction as unlawful, the mere fact of non-consideration of the application is insufficient – specific reasons and circumstances are important. In this case, the HQCJ took active steps to consider the issue of including the application in the agenda, therefore its behavior cannot be considered inaction.
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.