Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/928 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/125 (Trade in Goods for Torture)
This regulation updates the lists of goods that are either completely prohibited (Annex II) or require authorization for export, import, or transit (Annex III) when they could be used for capital punishment, torture, or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. The updates reflect changes in the international security market and the use of law enforcement equipment.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/927 on Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification of Aviation Emissions (CORSIA)
This regulation overhauls the system for monitoring, reporting, and verifying aviation emissions, aligning it with the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). It sets out detailed requirements for aircraft operators regarding emissions reporting, the use of CORSIA-eligible fuels, and the cancellation of emission units to offset international aviation emissions. It replaces Regulation (EU) 2019/1603 with updates to comply with the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the latest ICAO standards.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1545 amending Regulations (EU) 2018/2019 and (EU) 2020/1213 (Phytosanitary Measures for Plants from the UK)
This regulation modifies phytosanitary measures for specific plants originating in the United Kingdom. It updates the lists of high-risk plants and clarifies the conditions for importing certain plants for planting into the EU. It details when Cornus, Populus, Sorbus, and Taxus plants from the UK are no longer considered high-risk and mandates specific conditions for importing Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea from the UK to prevent the spread of Discula destructiva.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1573 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1483 (Anti-Dumping Duties on Stainless Steel from China and Taiwan)
This regulation addresses a change of name for Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation, now Angang Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation. It ensures that the existing anti-dumping duty rate applicable to the company remains unchanged under its new name and provides clarity on the effective date of the name change for customs purposes.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1549 correcting Regulations (EU) 2023/2210 and (EU) 2022/1365 (Novel Foods)
This regulation corrects errors in previous regulations concerning the novel foods 3-Fucosyllactose (3-FL) and Schizochytrium sp. oil, including the conditions of use for food supplements for children aged 18 months to 18 years and the inclusion of foods for special medical purposes intended for infants and young children in the conditions of use for 3-Fucosyllactose (3-FL).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1528 authorising Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil as a novel food.
This regulation permits the use of Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil as a novel food within the EU. It details the conditions of use, maximum levels in various food categories, labelling requirements, and technical specifications to ensure product quality and safety.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1530 authorising potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate as a novel food.
This regulation authorises the use of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate as a novel food within the EU. It sets out specific permitted uses and maximum levels of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate in specific food categories, it also mandates specific labelling requirements, and grants BK Giulini GmbH exclusive rights for five years.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1560 authorising a health claim regarding green kiwifruit and its effect on bowel function.
This regulation allows food businesses to claim that green kiwifruit contributes to normal bowel function. The conditions of use state that the claim can only be used for fresh green kiwifruits providing a minimum of 200g of kiwi flesh and informs consumers that the beneficial effect is obtained with a daily intake of 200g of fresh green kiwi flesh.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1542 on quality reports related to the Economic Accounts for Agriculture
This regulation mandates Member States to transmit quality reports to the Commission (Eurostat) to ensure common quality reporting standards for the Economic Accounts for Agriculture in the European Union. The regulation defines the content of the report and the indicators that will be used to assess the quality of the data provided by Member States.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1567 specifying rules for qualified trust service providers (QTSPs).
This regulation mandates the application of the ETSI TS 119 431-1 standard, with specified adaptations, for assessing the conformance of qualified trust services managing remote electronic signature and seal creation devices. It ensures that QTSPs adhere to strict requirements for personnel qualifications and training, cryptographic key management, network security, and the publication of relevant information to ensure the security, trustworthiness, and compliance of their services with the eIDAS Regulation.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1570 establishing rules for Member States to notify information to the European Commission.
This regulation specifies that Member States must use a secure electronic channel to submit the information detailing device identification, the identity of the body that applied for certification, device description, certificate of conformity, references to certification reports, the identity of the certification report issuer, URLs for publicly available certification reports, certification dates, certification status, and contact details of the designated body. This detailed information is crucial for maintaining a reliable and transparent record of qualified electronic signature and seal creation devices within the EU.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1578 concerning the EU’s fight against terrorism.
The regulation updates the list of individuals, groups, and entities subject to asset freezes and other restrictive measures. It is crucial for ensuring that the EU’s counter-terrorism measures are targeted and up-to-date, based on decisions made by competent national authorities regarding the involvement of these individuals and entities in terrorist acts.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1536 establishing the procedure for mobilizing the enhanced emergency capacity of the EU Health Task Force (EUHTF).
This regulation clarifies how Member States can access support from the EUHTF during a health crisis and how the ECDC manages and prioritizes requests for assistance to ensure an effective response. It describes the procedure for requesting the mobilisation of the enhanced emergency capacity, the ECDC’s role in coordinating assistance and sets out the monitoring activities and reporting from ECDC.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1572 establishing rules for how supervisory bodies verify that trust service providers comply with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
This regulation outlines the format and procedures for trust service providers to notify their intentions and for supervisory bodies to verify compliance. Trust service providers need to ensure that their notifications include all the required information, such as risk analysis, identifiers for the trust service, conformity assessment reports, and termination plans. They should also be prepared for on-site verifications and interviews by supervisory bodies.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1569 of 29 July 2025.
This regulation establishes rules for applying Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 concerning qualified electronic attestations of attributes and electronic attestations of attributes provided by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source. It aims to ensure a high level of harmonization among Member States for developing and certifying European Digital Identity Wallets and to facilitate cooperation among Member States in establishing a secure and interoperable digital identity ecosystem. The regulation also focuses on protecting against untrustworthy information and ensuring the revocation of electronic attestations of attributes when necessary.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1566 specifies the reference standards for verifying the identity.
This regulation specifies how the ETSI TS 119 461 standard should be applied. Key aspects include the requirements for identity verification processes to be peer-reviewed or certified, the criteria for independent conformity assessment bodies, the establishment of target values for False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) in automated identity proofing, the validation of physical identity documents by accredited laboratories, and the compliance of termination plans with eIDAS Regulation requirements. These provisions set a clear benchmark for qualified trust service providers to ensure secure and reliable identity verification processes.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1583 concerns restrictive measures against individuals and entities in view of the situation in Libya.
This regulation deletes Mohamad Ali HOUEJ from the list of sanctioned individuals. This means that any restrictive measures previously in place against this person, such as asset freezes and travel bans, are now lifted.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1526 of 29 July 2025, which specifies the variables, technical specifications, statistical classifications, and precision targets for data collection on the ‘structure of earnings’.
The most important provisions for practical use are the detailed specifications in Annex I regarding the variables to be collected, including their definitions, modality codes, and the distinction between mandatory and optional data points, especially concerning smaller enterprises. Additionally, the precision targets outlined in Annex II are crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of the collected data.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1571 establishes the formats and procedures for annual reports.
The main provisions of this act are the requirements for the content and format of the annual reports. Annex I lists the information to be included in the annual reports of supervisory bodies for the European Digital Identity Wallets. Annex II details similar information requirements for the annual reports of supervisory bodies for trust services, including descriptions of supervisory activities, summaries of inspections, notifications of security breaches, cooperation with other supervisory bodies, verification of termination plans, investigations of claims made by web browser providers, activities related to trusted lists, and information about national accreditation schemes.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1568 of 29 July 2025, which establishes the rules for peer reviews of electronic identification (eID) schemes.
It ensures that Member States have a clear understanding of the eID schemes being notified by others, fostering cooperation and trust across the Union. The regulation establishes standardized roles and responsibilities within the peer review process, ensuring efficient and effective evaluations.The requirement for pre-notification and the provision of detailed information, including level of assurance mapping, a whitepaper, and interoperability framework mapping, ensures transparency and facilitates thorough assessment.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1537 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 regarding the conditions of use for the novel food “3-Fucosyllactose produced by a derivative strain of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)”.
The main change introduced by this regulation is the increase in the maximum authorized use levels of 3-Fucosyllactose in certain food categories. Specifically, the allowed concentration in infant formula, follow-on formula, and foods for special medical purposes for infants and young children is raised from 0.9 g/L, 0.9 g/L, and 1.2 g/L, respectively, to 1.75 g/L for all three categories. Additionally, the maximum authorized use level in food supplements for the general population (excluding infants and young children) is increased from 3.0 g/day to 4.0 g/day. The regulation also includes specific labeling requirements for food supplements containing 3-Fucosyllactose.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1527 authorises the use of two preparations of *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* as feed additives for all animal species.
The regulation outlines the conditions of use, including minimum content levels and necessary protective measures for users to mitigate potential health risks. The most important provisions for users include the specified storage conditions, the minimum dosage of 1 × 109 CFU/kg fresh plant material, and the requirement for feed business operators to establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks, including the use of personal protective equipment.
Commission Regulation amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 regarding maximum residue levels (MRLs) for acetamiprid in or on specific products.
The regulation updates MRLs for plums, linseeds, poppy seeds, mustard seeds, gold of pleasure seeds, honey, other apiculture products, and soyabeans, aligning them with scientific assessments and international limits. The most important provisions for practical use are the revised MRLs for acetamiprid in the specified products, as detailed in the annex. These new levels are crucial for producers, manufacturers, and control authorities to ensure compliance with EU regulations.
Regulation (EU) 2025/1561 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, focusing on the due diligence obligations for economic operators.
The key change is a postponement of the application date of these due diligence obligations from August 18, 2025, to August 18, 2027. This extension provides economic operators with additional time to establish and refine their due diligence policies, conduct supply chain analysis, and prepare for third-party verification.
Agreement establishing a framework for the Republic of Armenia’s participation in European Union crisis management operations.
This agreement establishes a framework for Armenia to contribute personnel and resources to both civilian and military EU crisis management operations, covering aspects such as decision-making, the status of personnel, command and control, financial contributions, and classified information. The most important provisions for practical use are those concerning the decision-making process, the status and responsibility of personnel, the chain of command, and the financial contributions.
Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea regarding Korea’s participation in Union programs.
This agreement establishes a framework for the Republic of Korea to participate in specific EU programs and activities. It outlines the terms, conditions, and financial contributions required for such participation, fostering cooperation between the EU and Korea. This article is crucial as it defines how Korea can participate in specific EU programs. The Protocols mentioned here are essential for understanding the exact scope and conditions of participation in each program.
Court judgment regarding Case E-23/24, “AO and IM”.
The judgment clarifies that when assessing whether an EEA national has sufficient resources under Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC, all available resources must be considered, irrespective of their origin. This includes resources provided in whole or in part by a third-country national.
Notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) announces the applicable interest rates.
The notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) announces the applicable interest rates for the recovery of unlawful state aid and the reference/discount rates for EFTA States, effective from May 1, 2025. The base rates are essential for determining the amount of interest to be charged on illegally granted state aid that needs to be recovered from beneficiaries. They also serve as a benchmark for calculating the discount rate applied to future cash flows in certain state aid assessments.
Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway.
The request concerns the interpretation of Article 5 of Directive 2008/104/EC on temporary agency work. The question focuses on the scope of Article 5 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive in a specific context: temporary workers employed by an agency in an EEA state, working for a company in the same EEA state, but operating on a vessel involved in petroleum activities on the state’s continental shelf.
Decision by the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding a Norwegian aid scheme for the development of a new floating offshore wind farm in Utsira Nord.
The decision provides key details about the aid scheme, including the date of adoption (April 15, 2025), the case number (93862), and the decision number (067/25/COL). The most important provisions for potential users are the budget of NOK 35 billion available as direct grants, the competitive bidding procedure that will determine the aid intensity, and the timeline with the auction scheduled for 2028-2029. These elements will be crucial for companies interested in participating in the development of the floating offshore wind farm and accessing the available funding.
Decision by the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding a state aid measure implemented by Norway.
The decision states that the Authority has no objections to amendments made to the Norwegian tax refund scheme for employing seafarers. The legal basis for the scheme is the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea of 26 February 2016 No 204.For businesses operating in the Norwegian maritime transport sector, this decision confirms the continuation of financial support through the tax refund scheme.
Review of each of legal acts published today:
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/928 of 21 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/125 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/928 amends Regulation (EU) 2019/125, which concerns trade in goods that could be used for capital punishment, torture, or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. The key aim of this amendment is to update the lists of goods in Annex II and Annex III of the original regulation to reflect changes in the international security market and the use (or misuse) of law enforcement equipment. These annexes list goods that are either prohibited or require authorization for export, import, or transit.
The regulation consists of two articles and two annexes. Article 1 stipulates that Annex II and Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2019/125 are replaced by the texts provided in Annex I and Annex II of this new regulation, respectively. Article 2 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and that it is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Annex II lists goods that are completely prohibited, such as guillotines, electric chairs, and certain types of restraints. Annex III lists goods that require authorization for trade, including certain types of shackles, portable electric discharge weapons, and equipment disseminating incapacitating or irritating chemicals.
The most important provisions for users are the updated lists of prohibited and controlled goods in Annexes II and III. These lists determine which goods are subject to trade restrictions, and economic operators need to ensure they comply with these updated lists to avoid legal repercussions. The changes reflect an effort to keep the regulations aligned with technological advancements and evolving practices in law enforcement and security.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/927 of 20 May 2025 supplementing Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards measures adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization for the monitoring, reporting and verification of aviation emissions for the purpose of implementing a global market-based measure and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1603
Here’s a breakdown of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/927:
**1. Essence of the Act:**
This regulation updates the rules for monitoring, reporting, and verifying aviation emissions to align with the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). It ensures that aviation operators within the EU and those operating flights to or from overseas territories adhere to a consistent standard for emissions reporting, including the use of CORSIA-eligible fuels. The regulation also sets out requirements for the cancellation of emission units to offset international aviation emissions. It repeals and replaces the previous regulation (EU) 2019/1603 to reflect amendments to the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and to incorporate the latest ICAO standards.
**2. Structure and Main Provisions:**
* **Scope (Article 1):** Defines which aircraft operators and flights are subject to the regulation, focusing on those covered by the EU ETS and flights to/from overseas territories.
* **Definitions (Article 2):** Clarifies key terms like “CORSIA eligible fuel” and “emissions unit.”
* **Administering Member State (Article 3):** Specifies which Member State an aircraft operator reports to, based on its listing in Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 or where it holds its air operator certificate.
* **Monitoring and Reporting of Emissions (Article 4):** States that aircraft operators must follow the requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2066 for monitoring and reporting emissions, unless this regulation specifies otherwise.
* **Monitoring and Reporting of CORSIA Eligible Fuels (Article 5):** Sets out specific rules for monitoring and reporting the use of CORSIA eligible fuels, including the need for a declaration listing all greenhouse gas schemes the operator participates in to prevent double claiming of emission reductions.
* **Verification of Data (Article 6):** Requires verification of emissions data and CORSIA eligible fuels data by accredited verifiers, following the requirements of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2067, but with specific additional requirements for CORSIA fuels.
* **Reporting on Emissions Unit Cancellation (Article 7):** Details the process for aircraft operators to report the cancellation of emissions units to meet their offsetting requirements under CORSIA.
* **Verification of Emissions Unit Cancellation Reports (Article 8):** Specifies how emissions unit cancellation reports are verified, requiring a reasonable level of assurance and outlining the objectives the verifier must meet.
* **Transmission of Data to ICAO (Article 9):** Obliges Member States to transmit relevant emissions data and information on emissions unit cancellations to the ICAO Secretariat.
* **Repeal (Article 10):** Formally repeals Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1603.
* **Transitional Provision (Article 11):** States that the regulation applies to emissions and CORSIA eligible fuel use from January 1, 2024.
* **Entry into Force (Article 12):** Specifies the regulation’s entry into force.
**Changes Compared to Previous Versions:**
The regulation updates and replaces Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1603 to align with amendments to Directive 2003/87/EC and to incorporate the Second Edition of the CORSIA SARPs adopted by ICAO. The key changes include:
* Updated rules for monitoring, reporting, and verification of the use of CORSIA eligible fuels.
* Specific requirements for the cancellation of emissions units for offsetting under CORSIA.
* Alignment with the latest provisions set out in Directive 2003/87/EC.
**3. Main Provisions Important for Use:**
* **Article 5 (Monitoring and Reporting of CORSIA Eligible Fuels):** This is crucial for aircraft operators planning to use CORSIA eligible fuels to reduce their offsetting requirements. It details how to monitor, report, and document the use of these fuels, including the need for certification and the prevention of double claiming.
* **Article 6 (Verification of Data on Emissions and CORSIA Eligible Fuels):** This article outlines the verification process, which is essential for ensuring the accuracy and credibility of reported emissions and fuel use data. Aircraft operators need to understand the requirements for verifier accreditation and the scope of the verification activities.
* **Article 7 (Reporting on Emissions Unit Cancellation):** This article is important for aircraft operators that have offsetting requirements under CORSIA. It details the process for reporting the cancellation of emissions units and the information that must be included in the emissions unit cancellation report.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1545 of 30 July 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as regards certain plants for planting of Cornus alba, Cornus sanguinea, Populus alba, Populus nigra, Populus tremula, Sorbus aucuparia and Taxus baccata originating in the United Kingdom and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213 as regards the phytosanitary measures for the introduction into the Union territory of plants for planting of Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea originating in the United Kingdom
This is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1545, which amends two previous regulations, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213, concerning phytosanitary measures for certain plants originating in the United Kingdom. The regulation updates the lists of high-risk plants and specifies the conditions for the introduction of certain plants for planting into the Union territory. It aims to reduce the phytosanitary risk associated with these plants by setting out appropriate measures to address potential pest-related risks.
The regulation is structured into three articles and two annexes. Article 1 amends the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, modifying the entries for Cornus L., Populus L., Sorbus L., and Taxus L. to exclude certain plants originating in the United Kingdom from being considered high-risk. Article 2 amends the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213 by adding an entry for Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea from the United Kingdom, specifying phytosanitary measures. Article 3 states that the regulation will enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Annex I details the amendments to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019, while Annex II outlines the changes to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1213, including specific requirements for importing Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea from the UK.
The most important provisions of this act are those that outline the specific conditions under which certain plants from the UK are no longer considered high-risk and the phytosanitary measures required for importing Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea. Specifically, the regulation details the sizes, ages, and conditions (bare-rooted or in growing medium) under which Cornus, Populus, Sorbus, and Taxus plants from the UK are exempt from high-risk status. Additionally, it mandates that imports of Cornus alba and Cornus sanguinea from the UK must be accompanied by an official statement confirming the plants are free from Discula destructiva, and that specific measures have been taken at the production site to prevent its spread.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1573 of 30 July 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1483 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1573 addresses a change of name for a company subject to anti-dumping duties. Specifically, it amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1483, which imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. The amendment acknowledges that Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation has changed its name to Angang Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation and ensures that the existing anti-dumping duty rate applicable to the company remains unchanged under its new name.
The regulation consists of two articles. Article 1 amends the Annex of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1483 to reflect the company’s new name, replacing “Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation” with “Angang Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation” while maintaining the TARIC additional code C026. It also specifies that the TARIC code C026 applies to Angang Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation from 11 July 2024 and provides for the repayment or remission of any definitive duties paid in excess of the anti-dumping duty established in the original regulation. Article 2 stipulates that the regulation will enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and confirms that it is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
The most important provision is Article 1, which ensures the continuity of the anti-dumping duty rate for Angang Lianzhong Stainless Steel Corporation under its new name and provides clarity on the effective date of the name change for customs purposes. This prevents any disruption in the application of anti-dumping duties and ensures fair treatment in accordance with applicable customs legislation.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1549 of 30 July 2025 correcting Implementing Regulations (EU) 2023/2210 and (EU) 2022/1365 as regards the conditions of use of the novel foods 3-Fucosyllactose produced by a derivative strain of Escherichia coli K-12 DH1 and Schizochytrium sp. oil rich in DHA and EPA
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1549 addresses errors found in previous regulations concerning novel foods, specifically Implementing Regulations (EU) 2023/2210 and (EU) 2022/1365. The regulation corrects the conditions of use for 3-Fucosyllactose (3-FL) and Schizochytrium sp. oil rich in DHA and EPA, ensuring clarity and legal certainty for food business operators and Member States’ authorities. It aims to rectify omissions and inconsistencies in the existing regulations to align with the original intentions and scientific assessments.
The structure of the regulation is straightforward. It consists of a preamble that outlines the reasons for the corrections, followed by three articles. Article 1 and 2 specify the corrections to Implementing Regulations (EU) 2022/1365 and (EU) 2023/2210, respectively, with detailed amendments provided in Annex I and II. Article 3 states the date of entry into force. The main changes include the addition of the use of Schizochytrium sp. oil in food supplements for children from 18 months to 18 years of age at levels of 250 mg/day, and the inclusion of foods for special medical purposes intended for infants and young children in the conditions of use for 3-Fucosyllactose (3-FL).
The most important provisions for practical use are the corrected conditions for using 3-FL and Schizochytrium sp. oil. For Schizochytrium sp. oil, the inclusion of food supplements for children aged 18 months to 18 years at a level of 250 mg/day is significant for manufacturers targeting this demographic. For 3-FL, the addition of foods for special medical purposes intended for infants and young children allows for its use in these specialized products, provided the levels do not exceed 1.75 g/L. Food business operators must ensure their products comply with these corrected conditions to avoid legal issues.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1528 of 30 July 2025 authorising the placing on the market of Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil as a novel food and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1528 authorises the placing of Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil on the market as a novel food within the European Union. It amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 to include tiger nut oil in the Union list of novel foods, specifying its conditions of use, labelling requirements, and technical specifications. The regulation follows a safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which concluded that tiger nut oil is safe for the general population under the proposed conditions.
The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 authorises the placing on the market of Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil within the Union and its inclusion in the Union list of novel foods. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex amends the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 by adding entries for Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil in Table 1 (Authorised novel foods) and Table 2 (Specifications). Table 1 outlines the conditions of use, maximum levels in various food categories, and specific labelling requirements. Table 2 provides a detailed description of the novel food, including its production process, fatty acid composition, characteristics, heavy metal and mycotoxin limits, and microbiological criteria.
The most important provisions for businesses and consumers are the conditions of use and specifications outlined in the Annex. These include maximum levels of tiger nut oil allowed in specific food categories such as pasta, bread, snacks, salad dressings, fats, fine bakery wares, and milk-based products. The labelling must include the designation “Cyperus esculentus (tiger nut) oil”. The specifications detail the oil’s composition and purity standards, ensuring product quality and safety.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1530 of 30 July 2025 authorising the placing on the market of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate as a novel food and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1530 authorises the use of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate as a novel food within the European Union. It amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 to include this new food in the Union list of novel foods. The regulation specifies the conditions of use, labelling requirements, and protects the data submitted by the applicant company, BK Giulini GmbH, for a period of five years.
The regulation consists of four articles and an annex. Article 1 authorises the placing on the market of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate within the Union and mandates its inclusion in the Union list of novel foods. Article 2 grants exclusive rights to BK Giulini GmbH to place the novel food on the market for five years, with exceptions for subsequent applicants who obtain authorisation independently. Article 3 protects the scientific studies and data submitted by BK Giulini GmbH for five years, preventing their use by subsequent applicants without consent. Article 4 states that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 by adding potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate to the list of authorised novel foods and specifying its conditions of use and specifications.
The most important provisions for stakeholders include the permitted uses and maximum levels of potassium magnesium trichloride hexahydrate in specific food categories such as raw cured meat, cooked cured meat, cereal-based dishes, and preserved or partly preserved sausages. The regulation also mandates specific labelling requirements, including the designation of the novel food as ‘potassium magnesium mineral salt’ and the inclusion of potassium and/or magnesium amounts in the nutrition declaration if the final product contains a significant amount of these minerals. Furthermore, the data protection clause grants BK Giulini GmbH exclusive rights for five years, impacting other companies seeking authorisation for the same novel food.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1560 of 30 July 2025 authorising a health claim made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health, and amending Regulation (EU) No 432/2012
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1560 authorises a specific health claim regarding green kiwifruit and its effect on bowel function. It allows food businesses to state that consuming green kiwifruit contributes to normal bowel function by increasing stool frequency, provided certain conditions are met. This regulation amends Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 to include this new authorised health claim in the Union list of permitted health claims on foods.
The structure of the act is straightforward. It begins with recitals that explain the reasoning behind the regulation, referencing Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. It then lays out the decision to authorise the health claim related to green kiwifruit, based on the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) scientific opinion. The core of the act consists of three articles: Article 1 mandates the inclusion of the health claim in the Union list of permitted claims. Article 2 amends the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 to reflect this addition. Article 3 specifies the date of entry into force of the regulation. The Annex provides the specific wording of the claim, the conditions of use, and the EFSA Journal reference. This regulation adds a new entry to the list of permitted health claims, it does not remove or alter existing claims.
The most important provisions for practical use are found in the Annex. Specifically, the conditions of use state that the claim can only be used for fresh green kiwifruits sold as such or those that have only been peeled and/or cut, providing a minimum of 200g of kiwi flesh. Furthermore, it mandates that consumers must be informed that the beneficial effect is obtained with a daily intake of 200g of fresh green kiwi flesh. Food businesses must adhere to these conditions to legally use the claim on their products.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1542 of 30 July 2025 specifying the modalities, structure and assessment indicators for the quality reports to be transmitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 138/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1542 specifying the modalities, structure and assessment indicators for the quality reports related to the Economic Accounts for Agriculture in the European Union. The Regulation mandates Member States to transmit quality reports to the Commission (Eurostat) to ensure common quality reporting standards. These reports aim to harmonize quality assurance and reporting within the European Statistical System.
The Regulation consists of 4 articles and 2 annexes.
– Article 1 defines the modalities for the transmission of quality reports, specifying the reference years and the use of the European Statistical System transmission standard.
– Article 2 outlines the structure of the quality reports, requiring a single report covering all data of the Economic Accounts for Agriculture transmission program and detailing the contents as specified in Annex I. It also requires explanations for any non-compliance with quality standards or incorrect application of statistical concepts.
– Article 3 states that the quality of data and metadata will be assessed based on the quality and performance indicators outlined in Annex II.
– Article 4 indicates the date of entry into force of the regulation.
– Annex I details the structure and contents of the quality reports, listing statistical concepts and sub-concepts to be included.
– Annex II lists the quality and performance indicators to be used for assessing the quality of the Economic Accounts for Agriculture data and metadata.
The most important provisions of this act are those that define the content of the report and the indicators that will be used to assess the quality of the data provided by Member States. These are detailed in Annex I and Annex II, respectively.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1567 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the management of remote qualified electronic signature creation devices and of remote qualified electronic seal creation devices as qualified trust services
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1567 establishes specific rules for qualified trust service providers (QTSPs) that manage remote qualified electronic signature creation devices and remote qualified electronic seal creation devices. It aims to enhance the security and trustworthiness of these services, ensuring that they meet the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation). The regulation mandates compliance with specific standards to guarantee signatories and seal creators maintain sole control over their electronic signature and seal creation data.
The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 specifies that the reference standards and specifications for managing remote qualified electronic signature and seal creation devices are those set out in the Annex. Article 2 states the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and will be applicable starting from August 19, 2027. The Annex lists the reference standards and specifications, primarily focusing on the ETSI TS 119 431-1 V1.3.1 (2024-12) standard, with specific adaptations related to normative references, publication and repository responsibilities, personnel controls, service termination, network security controls, cryptographic controls, and general requirements.
The most important provision of this regulation is the mandatory application of the ETSI TS 119 431-1 standard, with the specified adaptations, for assessing the conformance of qualified trust services managing remote electronic signature and seal creation devices. This includes strict requirements for personnel qualifications and training, cryptographic key management, network security, and the publication of relevant information. QTSPs must adhere to these standards to ensure the security, trustworthiness, and compliance of their services with the eIDAS Regulation.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1570 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards notification of information on certified qualified electronic signature creation devices and certified qualified electronic seal creation devices
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1570 establishes the rules for Member States to notify information to the European Commission regarding certified qualified electronic signature creation devices and certified qualified electronic seal creation devices, as required by Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation). The aim is to create a transparent and reliable source of information on these devices. The Regulation ensures that the Commission receives timely updates on the certification status of these devices.
The Regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 specifies that Member States must use a secure electronic channel provided by the Commission to submit the information detailed in the Annex. It also requires Member States to update the Commission on any changes to the initially submitted information, including changes to the certification status of the devices. Article 2 defines the entry into force and application dates of the regulation. The Annex lists the specific information that Member States must provide, including device identification, the identity of the body that applied for certification, device description, certificate of conformity, references to certification reports, the identity of the certification report issuer, URLs for publicly available certification reports, certification dates, certification status, and contact details of the designated body.
The most important provisions for practical use are those outlined in Article 1 and the Annex. Article 1 mandates the use of a secure electronic channel for notifications and updates, ensuring a standardized and secure communication method. The Annex details the specific data points required for each notification, ensuring that the Commission receives comprehensive and consistent information about certified devices. This detailed information is crucial for maintaining a reliable and transparent record of qualified electronic signature and seal creation devices within the EU.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1578 of 29 July 2025 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/206
This Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1578 concerns the EU’s fight against terrorism by updating the list of individuals, groups, and entities subject to specific restrictive measures. It repeals the previous list, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/206, and replaces it with an updated version.
The Regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 establishes that the updated list of persons, groups, and entities subject to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 is set out in the Annex. Article 2 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/206. Article 3 stipulates that the Regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex contains the updated list of individuals, groups, and entities subject to specific restrictive measures. Compared to the previous version, one person has been removed from the list, while other entries have been reviewed and maintained.
The most important provision of this regulation is the updated list in the Annex, which specifies the individuals, groups, and entities subject to asset freezes and other restrictive measures under Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001. This list is crucial for ensuring that the EU’s counter-terrorism measures are targeted and up-to-date, based on decisions made by competent national authorities regarding the involvement of these individuals and entities in terrorist acts.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1536 of 29 July 2025 setting out the procedure concerning the mobilisation of the enhanced emergency capacity of the EU Health Task Force
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1536 establishes the procedure for mobilizing the enhanced emergency capacity of the EU Health Task Force (EUHTF) in response to a public health emergency at the Union level. It outlines the steps for requesting and coordinating assistance from EUHTF experts to support Member States during such emergencies. The regulation ensures a structured and coordinated approach to leveraging the EUHTF’s resources for effective crisis response.
The Regulation consists of 5 articles.
* **Article 1** describes the procedure for requesting the mobilisation of the enhanced emergency capacity. It requires consultation within the Health Security Committee following the recognition of a public health emergency. If at least two Member States and the Commission agree, the Commission submits a joint request to the ECDC.
* **Article 2** outlines the ECDC’s responsibilities upon receiving a joint request, including informing Member States about submitting requests for assistance and coordinating with the Commission and the Health Security Committee to prioritize these requests.
* **Article 3** states that the mobilization of the enhanced emergency capacity ends with the termination of the public health emergency at Union level.
* **Article 4** mandates the ECDC to monitor the activities performed by the enhanced emergency capacity and to provide monthly reports to the Health Security Committee and the Commission on the main outcomes.
* **Article 5** specifies that the Regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The most important provisions for practical use are those detailing the mobilization procedure (Article 1) and the ECDC’s role in coordinating assistance (Article 2). These articles clarify how Member States can access support from the EUHTF during a health crisis and how the ECDC manages and prioritizes requests for assistance to ensure an effective response.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1572 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the format and procedures for notification of intention and verification with regard to the initiation of qualified trust services
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1572 establishes rules for how supervisory bodies verify that trust service providers comply with Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation) when they intend to start providing qualified trust services. It aims to ensure that all qualified trust service providers operate under the same conditions across the EU. The regulation outlines the format and procedures for trust service providers to notify their intentions and for supervisory bodies to verify compliance.
The regulation consists of 5 articles. Article 1 mandates supervisory bodies to establish a methodology for verifying compliance, including procedures for involving competent authorities responsible for cybersecurity. Article 2 focuses on transparency, requiring supervisory bodies to make specific information publicly available, such as contact details, communication channels, required documentation, complaint procedures, and a general description of the verification methodology. Article 3 details the information that trust service providers must include in their notifications, covering aspects like the provider’s identity, contact information, service details, risk analysis, and termination plans. Article 4 outlines the verification process for supervisory bodies, including analyzing provided information, conducting on-site verifications, and performing interviews. It specifies the elements that supervisory bodies must verify, such as the conformity assessment report’s compliance and any indications of non-conformity. Article 5 specifies the entry into force and applicability date of the regulation.
The most important provisions for trust service providers are those related to the information they must provide in their notifications (Article 3) and the elements that supervisory bodies will verify (Article 4). Trust service providers need to ensure that their notifications include all the required information, such as risk analysis, identifiers for the trust service, conformity assessment reports, and termination plans. They should also be prepared for on-site verifications and interviews by supervisory bodies.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1569 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards qualified electronic attestations of attributes and electronic attestations of attributes provided by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source
This is an analysis of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1569 of 29 July 2025.
This regulation establishes rules for applying Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 concerning qualified electronic attestations of attributes and electronic attestations of attributes provided by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source. It aims to ensure a high level of harmonization among Member States for developing and certifying European Digital Identity Wallets and to facilitate cooperation among Member States in establishing a secure and interoperable digital identity ecosystem. The regulation also focuses on protecting against untrustworthy information and ensuring the revocation of electronic attestations of attributes when necessary.
The regulation consists of 11 articles and 3 annexes. It defines key terms such as “wallet unit,” “wallet user,” “catalogue of attributes,” and “scheme for the attestation of attributes.” It outlines the requirements for issuing and revoking qualified electronic attestations of attributes and electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body, including compliance with reference standards, technical specifications, and schemes registered in the catalogue of schemes. The regulation also establishes procedures for Member States to notify public sector bodies to the Commission, which will then publish a list of these bodies. Furthermore, it sets up a framework for creating and maintaining a catalogue of attributes and a catalogue of schemes for the attestation of attributes, as well as mechanisms for verifying attributes against authentic sources or designated intermediaries.
Key provisions include the requirements for providers of electronic attestations of attributes to comply with specific standards and technical specifications (Article 3 and Annexes I & II), the conditions under which electronic attestations of attributes must be revoked (Article 4), and the establishment of mechanisms for verifying attributes against authentic sources (Article 9). Member States must notify the Commission about their public sector bodies responsible for authentic sources (Article 5), and the Commission will maintain and publish a list of these providers (Article 6). The creation and maintenance of catalogues for attributes and attestation schemes are also crucial for ensuring interoperability and harmonization (Articles 7 & 8).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1566 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards reference standards for the verification of the identity and attributes of the person to whom the qualified certificate or the qualified electronic attestation of attributes is to be issued
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1566 specifies the reference standards for verifying the identity and attributes of individuals to whom qualified certificates or qualified electronic attestations of attributes are issued under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation). It aims to ensure that all qualified trust service providers conduct verifications in an equivalent manner, fostering trust and interoperability across the internal market. The Regulation adapts the standard ETSI TS 119 461 V2.1.1 (2025-02) for this purpose, including additional controls to enhance the security and trustworthiness of qualified trust services.
The structure of the Regulation is straightforward. It consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the reference standards and specifications referred to in Article 24(1c) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 are set out in the Annex to the Regulation. Article 2 defines the entry into force and the date of application of the regulation. The Annex details the specific adaptations to the ETSI TS 119 461 V2.1.1 standard, focusing on aspects such as normative references, use cases for issuing qualified certificates, identity proofing methods, automated operations, validation of physical identity documents, and termination plans. Compared to previous versions or the base eIDAS Regulation, this implementing act provides concrete technical specifications for identity verification, which were previously lacking in detail.
The most important provisions for practical use are those detailed in the Annex, which specifies how the ETSI TS 119 461 standard should be applied. Key aspects include the requirements for identity verification processes to be peer-reviewed or certified, the criteria for independent conformity assessment bodies, the establishment of target values for False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) in automated identity proofing, the validation of physical identity documents by accredited laboratories, and the compliance of termination plans with eIDAS Regulation requirements. These provisions set a clear benchmark for qualified trust service providers to ensure secure and reliable identity verification processes.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1583 of 29 July 2025 implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1583 concerns restrictive measures against individuals and entities in view of the situation in Libya. The regulation updates the list of designated persons and entities subject to these measures. Specifically, it removes one person from the list while maintaining the measures against all other listed individuals and entities.
The structure of the act is straightforward. It consists of a preamble outlining the reasons for the regulation, two articles, and an annex. Article 1 states that Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended as per the attached annex. Article 2 specifies the regulation’s entry into force. The annex itself details the specific amendment, which is the deletion of entry 8, concerning Mohamad Ali HOUEJ, from Part A (‘Persons’) of Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44. This regulation amends Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44, updating the list of individuals and entities subject to restrictive measures.
The most important provision is the deletion of Mohamad Ali HOUEJ from the list of sanctioned individuals. This means that any restrictive measures previously in place against this person, such as asset freezes and travel bans, are now lifted.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1526 of 29 July 2025 setting out the list and description of variables and their technical specifications, statistical classifications and precision targets for the topic structure of earnings pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2025/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council
This is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1526 of 29 July 2025, which specifies the variables, technical specifications, statistical classifications, and precision targets for data collection on the ‘structure of earnings’. This regulation is based on Regulation (EU) 2025/941 concerning European Union labour market statistics on businesses. The goal is to ensure accurate and internationally comparable statistics on earnings across the EU Member States.
The regulation consists of 4 articles and 2 annexes.
* **Article 1** defines that Annex I contains the list and description of variables, their technical specifications, and the statistical classifications to be used for the topic of ‘structure of earnings’. It also specifies that a limited set of variables should be collected on local units belonging to enterprises with 1 to 9 employees, as outlined in Annex I.
* **Article 2** stipulates that the precision targets for statistical surveys are set out in Annex II.
* **Article 3** outlines the formats for transmitting information to the Commission (Eurostat). Member States must transmit data sets in electronic form with fully checked and edited microdata, complying with validation rules according to the variable specifications in Annex I. Revised data must be transmitted as complete data sets. It also requires Member States to use statistical data exchange standards specified by the Commission (Eurostat) and the single entry point for data.
* **Article 4** states that the regulation will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and that it is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
* **Annex I** provides a detailed list and description of variables for both local units (Data set A) and employees (Data set B), including technical specifications and modality codes. It covers various aspects such as employer’s characteristics, employee’s characteristics, working periods, and earnings.
* **Annex II** sets out the precision targets for statistical surveys, aiming to keep the coefficient of variation below 1% for mean hourly earnings for all employees and below 10% for mean hourly earnings for each NACE section, with exceptions for sections representing less than 1% of total monthly earnings.
The most important provisions for practical use are the detailed specifications in Annex I regarding the variables to be collected, including their definitions, modality codes, and the distinction between mandatory and optional data points, especially concerning smaller enterprises. Additionally, the precision targets outlined in Annex II are crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of the collected data.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1571 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the formats and procedures for annual reports by supervisory bodies
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1571 establishes the formats and procedures for annual reports that supervisory bodies responsible for overseeing European Digital Identity Wallets and trust services must submit to the European Commission. The regulation aims to create a transparent and reliable source of information on supervisory activities, ensure secure data exchange, and reduce administrative complexity by standardizing the reporting process.
The regulation consists of two articles and two annexes. Article 1 specifies that supervisory bodies must submit their annual reports through a secure electronic channel provided by the Commission, re-using previously submitted information where appropriate. It also mandates that reports from supervisory bodies for European Digital Identity Wallets include the information detailed in Annex I, while reports from supervisory bodies for trust services must include the information outlined in Annex II. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
The main provisions of this act are the requirements for the content and format of the annual reports. Annex I lists the information to be included in the annual reports of supervisory bodies for the European Digital Identity Wallets, such as the body’s contact details, scope of activities, organizational structure, a description of supervisory activities, summaries of inspections, notifications of security breaches, information on requests to remedy failures, cooperation with other supervisory bodies, and an outlook on future supervisory activities. Annex II details similar information requirements for the annual reports of supervisory bodies for trust services, including descriptions of supervisory activities, summaries of inspections, notifications of security breaches, cooperation with other supervisory bodies, verification of termination plans, investigations of claims made by web browser providers, activities related to trusted lists, and information about national accreditation schemes.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1568 of 29 July 2025 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards procedural arrangements for peer reviews of electronic identification schemes and for cooperation on the organisation of such reviews within the Cooperation Group and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/296
This is a description of the **Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1568 of 29 July 2025**, which establishes the rules for peer reviews of electronic identification (eID) schemes under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (eIDAS Regulation). It outlines the procedures for Member States to cooperate on organizing and conducting these reviews within the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group. The goal is to ensure interoperability and build trust in notified eID schemes across the EU. This regulation also repeals Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/296.
**Structure and Main Provisions:**
The regulation is structured into 8 articles and 4 annexes, covering the general principles, initiation, preparation, organization, and outcomes of peer reviews, as well as the handling of significant changes in eID schemes.
* **Article 1** outlines the general principles for peer reviews, including voluntary participation, cost-bearing by participating Member States, confidentiality, conflict of interest disclosure, and dispute resolution within the Cooperation Group’s rules of procedure. It also sets a two-year interval between peer reviews unless significant changes occur.
* **Article 2** details the initiation of peer reviews, specifying the minimum information required in a pre-notification, including a comparison with Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502 (assurance levels), a high-level description of the eID scheme, and interoperability information related to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1501.
* **Article 3** describes the preparation phase, involving the Commission informing the Cooperation Group, scheduling a presentation by the notifying Member State, and the appointment of representatives to a peer review group. It also defines roles within the group, such as coordinator and rapporteurs, and sets a three-month timeframe for the review, extendable by two months.
* **Article 4** focuses on the organization of the peer review, establishing three working groups (enrolment, eID means management and authentication, and management and organization) to assess the eID scheme. It outlines activities such as documentation assessment, process examination, technical seminars, and drafting the peer review report.
* **Article 5** covers the outcome of the peer review, including the provision of a draft report and opinion to the notifying Member State, the submission of a final report to the Commission and Cooperation Group, and the adoption and publication of the Cooperation Group’s opinion on the peer review’s conclusion.
* **Article 6** addresses significant changes in peer-reviewed eID schemes, requiring Member States to notify the Cooperation Group of changes impacting interoperability, security, or trustworthiness, and allowing for updates to the peer review in such cases.
* **Article 7** repeals Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/296.
* **Article 8** specifies the entry into force of the regulation.
* **Annexes I, II, III and IV** provide templates for the levels of assurance mapping document, the white paper, the interoperability framework mapping document and the opinion on the electronic identification scheme of a Member State.
**Main Provisions for Practical Use:**
* The regulation provides a structured process for Member States to assess and improve the interoperability, security, and trustworthiness of their eID schemes through peer reviews.
* It ensures that Member States have a clear understanding of the eID schemes being notified by others, fostering cooperation and trust across the Union.
* The regulation establishes standardized roles and responsibilities within the peer review process, ensuring efficient and effective evaluations.
* The requirement for pre-notification and the provision of detailed information, including level of assurance mapping, a whitepaper, and interoperability framework mapping, ensures transparency and facilitates thorough assessment.
* The regulation includes provisions for updating peer reviews when significant changes occur in eID schemes, ensuring that the reviews remain relevant and up-to-date.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1537 of 29 July 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 as regards the conditions of use of the novel food 3-Fucosyllactose produced by a derivative strain of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1537 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 regarding the conditions of use for the novel food “3-Fucosyllactose produced by a derivative strain of Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3)”. The regulation updates the maximum authorized levels of this novel food in specific food categories, following a safety assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The changes respond to an application by Chr. Hansen A/S to increase these levels.
The structure of the regulation is straightforward: it consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470 is amended according to the annex of this new regulation. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex contains the revised conditions of use for 3-Fucosyllactose, replacing the previous entry in Table 1 of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470.
The main change introduced by this regulation is the increase in the maximum authorized use levels of 3-Fucosyllactose in certain food categories. Specifically, the allowed concentration in infant formula, follow-on formula, and foods for special medical purposes for infants and young children is raised from 0.9 g/L, 0.9 g/L, and 1.2 g/L, respectively, to 1.75 g/L for all three categories. Additionally, the maximum authorized use level in food supplements for the general population (excluding infants and young children) is increased from 3.0 g/day to 4.0 g/day. The regulation also includes specific labeling requirements for food supplements containing 3-Fucosyllactose, stating that they should not be consumed by children under 3 years of age and should not be used if other foods containing added 3-Fucosyllactose are consumed on the same day. The data protection for Chr. Hansen A/S remains in effect until January 25, 2028.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1527 of 29 July 2025 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 41028 and a preparation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NCIMB 30148 as feed additives for all animal species
This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1527 authorises the use of two preparations of *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* as feed additives for all animal species. These additives, specifically *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* NCIMB 41028 and *Lactiplantibacillus plantarum* NCIMB 30148, are classified as technological additives within the functional group of silage additives. The regulation outlines the conditions of use, including minimum content levels and necessary protective measures for users to mitigate potential health risks.
The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the preparations specified in the annex are authorised as additives in animal nutrition, subject to the conditions laid down in that annex. Article 2 indicates the date of entry into force of the regulation. The Annex provides detailed information regarding the authorised additives, including their composition, identification number, and analytical methods. It specifies that these additives are for all animal species and sets a minimum content level of 1 × 109 CFU/kg fresh plant material when used as silage additives. It also mandates that feed business operators implement operational procedures and protective measures to address potential risks to users, including the use of personal protective equipment where risks cannot be eliminated otherwise. The authorisation period for both additives ends on 19 August 2035.
The most important provisions for users include the specified storage conditions, the minimum dosage of 1 × 109 CFU/kg fresh plant material, and the requirement for feed business operators to establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks, including the use of personal protective equipment.
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1212 of 24 June 2025 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for acetamiprid in or on certain products
This is a Commission Regulation amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 regarding maximum residue levels (MRLs) for acetamiprid in or on specific products. It adjusts the permissible levels of acetamiprid, a pesticide, in certain food and feed items to ensure consumer safety while considering international standards. The regulation updates MRLs for plums, linseeds, poppy seeds, mustard seeds, gold of pleasure seeds, honey, other apiculture products, and soyabeans, aligning them with scientific assessments and international limits.
The regulation consists of a preamble that outlines the reasons and justifications for the changes, followed by two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is amended as per the new regulation’s annex. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will come into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex provides a table replacing the existing acetamiprid column in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 with updated MRLs for various product categories. This includes specific values for different types of fruits, vegetables, oilseeds, and products of animal origin. The changes reflect the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) updated assessments and the adoption of a new Codex maximum residue limit (CXL) for acetamiprid in soyabeans.
The most important provisions for practical use are the revised MRLs for acetamiprid in the specified products, as detailed in the annex. These new levels are crucial for producers, manufacturers, and control authorities to ensure compliance with EU regulations. It is important to note the specific residue definition for acetamiprid in products of animal origin, which includes the sum of acetamiprid and its metabolite IM-2-1. Additionally, the regulation includes a note regarding unavailable information on residue trials for certain pesticide-product combinations, which the Commission will review if the information is submitted by 19 February 2027.
Regulation (EU) 2025/1561 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies (Text with EEA relevance)
This Regulation (EU) 2025/1561 amends Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, focusing on the due diligence obligations for economic operators concerning the sourcing of materials like cobalt, natural graphite, lithium, and nickel used in battery manufacturing. The key change is a postponement of the application date of these due diligence obligations. This adjustment aims to provide battery manufacturers more time to adapt to the requirements, particularly in light of ongoing geopolitical shifts and challenges in raw material sourcing.
The structure of the amending act is straightforward. It consists of two articles. Article 1 directly amends Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. Specifically, it changes the date from which battery due diligence obligations apply from August 18, 2025, to August 18, 2027. It also adjusts the date for the publication of guidelines by the Commission from February 18, 2025, to July 26, 2026. Article 2 stipulates that the Regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The most important provision of this amending regulation is the postponement of the application date for the battery due diligence obligations to August 18, 2027. This extension provides economic operators with additional time to establish and refine their due diligence policies, conduct supply chain analysis, and prepare for third-party verification. The harmonized date for the Commission’s guidelines is also crucial, ensuring that companies have adequate guidance on due diligence practices in line with both Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Directive (EU) 2024/1760 on corporate sustainability due diligence.
Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Armenia establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Armenia in European Union crisis management operations
This agreement establishes a framework for the Republic of Armenia’s participation in European Union crisis management operations. It outlines the conditions and procedures under which Armenia can contribute personnel and resources to both civilian and military EU crisis management operations. The agreement covers aspects such as decision-making processes, the status of Armenian personnel, command and control structures, financial contributions, and the handling of classified information. It aims to facilitate closer cooperation between the EU and Armenia in maintaining peace and security.
The agreement is structured into four main sections:
* **Section I (General Provisions):** Sets out the foundational principles governing Armenia’s participation, including decision-making processes, adherence to EU decisions, the status of Armenian personnel, and the protection of classified information.
* **Section II (Provisions on Participation in EU Civilian Crisis Management Operations):** Details the specific rules for Armenia’s involvement in EU civilian missions, covering aspects such as personnel deployment, command structures, financial responsibilities, and contributions to the operational budget.
* **Section III (Provisions on Participation in EU Military Crisis Management Operations):** Focuses on the framework for Armenia’s contribution to EU military operations, including the deployment of forces, command and control arrangements, financial aspects, and contributions to common costs.
* **Section IV (Final Provisions):** Addresses implementation arrangements, designation of competent authorities, conditions for termination, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Key provisions of the agreement include:
* **Article 1:** Establishes the decision-making process for Armenia’s participation, requiring Armenia to communicate its decision to participate and the EU to assess and decide on the proposed contribution.
* **Article 3:** Defines the status of Armenian personnel participating in EU crisis management operations, including jurisdictional aspects and liability for claims.
* **Articles 7 and 12:** Outline the financial responsibilities of Armenia, including potential contributions to the operational budget of civilian missions and the common costs of military operations, with possible exemptions under certain conditions.
* **Articles 6 and 10:** Detail the chain of command for civilian and military operations, respectively, emphasizing that while personnel remain under national command, operational control is transferred to the EU Operation Commander.
* **Article 4:** Requires Armenia to protect EU classified information according to EU security rules.
The agreement does not explicitly refer to previous versions, but it establishes a comprehensive framework for future cooperation, replacing the need for ad hoc agreements for each specific crisis management operation.
The most important provisions for practical use are those concerning the decision-making process (Article 1), the status and responsibility of personnel (Article 3), the chain of command (Articles 6 and 10), and the financial contributions (Articles 7 and 12). These articles define the rights and obligations of both parties and ensure a clear understanding of the terms of Armenia’s participation in EU crisis management operations.
Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, on the participation of the Republic of Korea in Union programmes
Here’s a breakdown of the agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea regarding Korea’s participation in Union programs:
**1. Essence of the Act:**
This agreement establishes a framework for the Republic of Korea to participate in specific EU programs and activities. It outlines the terms, conditions, and financial contributions required for such participation. The agreement aims to foster cooperation between the EU and Korea in areas of mutual interest, particularly in research and innovation, while ensuring compliance with EU regulations and protecting the EU’s financial interests.
**2. Structure and Main Provisions:**
* **Article 1:** Sets the subject matter of the agreement, which is to establish the terms and conditions for Korea’s participation in Union programs or activities covered by a Protocol to this Agreement.
* **Article 2:** Defines key terms used throughout the agreement, such as “basic act,” “funding agreement,” “Korean entity,” and “financial year.”
* **Article 3:** Establishes the conditions for Korea’s participation in Union programs or activities, specifying that participation must be in accordance with basic acts and Protocols to the agreement. It highlights the Protocol on the Association of Korea to Horizon Europe and allows for the Joint Committee to adopt and amend Protocols for other Union programs or activities.
* **Article 4:** Ensures Korea’s compliance with the rules of the Union program or activity in which it participates, including eligibility criteria and terms for submitting and implementing applications.
* **Article 5:** Defines the extent of Korea’s involvement in the governance of Union programs or activities, allowing Korean representatives or experts to participate as observers in relevant meetings, except those reserved for Member States only.
* **Article 6:** Details the financial conditions for Korea’s participation, including an operational contribution and a participation fee. It specifies how the operational contribution is calculated based on Korea’s GDP relative to the EU’s GDP.
* **Article 7:** Describes the adjustment mechanism for the operational contribution in certain Union programs or activities, allowing for retrospective adjustments based on budgetary commitments and decommitments.
* **Article 8:** Introduces an automatic correction mechanism for Union programs or activities, where the application of such mechanism is provided for in the respective Protocol to this Agreement.
* **Article 9:** Grants the Union the right to conduct reviews and audits of Korean entities receiving Union funding to ensure proper use of funds.
* **Article 10:** Focuses on protecting the EU’s financial interests against irregularities and fraud, allowing the European Commission and OLAF to conduct investigations in Korea.
* **Article 11:** Requires Korean authorities to cooperate with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in cases of criminal offenses affecting the EU’s financial interests.
* **Article 12:** Outlines the process for recovery and enforcement of financial obligations imposed on Korean entities by the European Commission or the Court of Justice of the European Union.
* **Article 13:** Allows direct communication between Union institutions and bodies and Korean entities receiving Union funding.
* **Article 14:** Establishes a Joint Committee composed of representatives from the EU and Korea to oversee the implementation of the agreement and its Protocols.
* **Article 15:** States that the Agreement shall be implemented in accordance with each Party’s applicable law in its respective jurisdiction.
* **Article 16:** Describes the consultation process for resolving any matters arising from the interpretation or implementation of the agreement.
* **Article 17:** Contains final provisions regarding entry into force, provisional application, termination, and amendments to the agreement.
**3. Main Provisions Important for Use:**
* **Article 3:** This article is crucial as it defines how Korea can participate in specific EU programs. The Protocols mentioned here are essential for understanding the exact scope and conditions of participation in each program.
* **Article 6:** This outlines the financial commitments Korea will need to make. Understanding the calculation of the operational contribution and participation fee is vital.
* **Articles 9 & 10:** These articles detail the EU’s rights regarding audits and investigations. Korean entities need to be aware of these provisions to ensure compliance and avoid potential issues.
* **Article 14:** This establishes the Joint Committee, which is the primary body for managing and reviewing the agreement. Understanding its functions is important for both parties.
In addition to the main agreement, there is a **Protocol on the Association of the Republic of Korea to Horizon Europe**. This protocol specifies that Korea will participate as an associated country in Pillar II of Horizon Europe, focusing on “Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness.” It also includes provisions on reciprocity, intellectual property rights, open science, and detailed rules on financial contributions and correction mechanisms specific to Horizon Europe.
**Annex I** of the Protocol provides detailed rules governing the financial contribution of Korea to Horizon Europe, including the calculation of the contribution and the application of the automatic correction mechanism. **Annex II** lists equivalent programs, projects, actions, and activities of Korea.
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 11 March 2025 in Case E-23/24 – AO and IM (Admissibility – Article 34 SCA – The notion of court or tribunal – The concept of independence – Article 1(2)(b) EEA – Free movement of persons – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7 – The concept of a worker – The condition of sufficient resources)
This is a judgment from the Court regarding Case E-23/24, “AO and IM,” concerning the interpretation of Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC, which relates to the right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States. The case specifically addresses whether an EEA national and their family member can be considered to have sufficient resources, as required by the Directive, if those resources come entirely from the income of a third-country national. The Immigration Appeals Board (Utlendingsnemnda) referred the request to the Court.
The judgment clarifies that when assessing whether an EEA national has sufficient resources under Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC, all available resources must be considered, irrespective of their origin. This includes resources provided in whole or in part by a third-country national.
The key provision of this judgment is the interpretation of “sufficient resources.” The court explicitly states that the origin of the resources is irrelevant when determining sufficiency. This means that if an EEA national is supported by a third-country national, those resources must be taken into account when assessing whether the EEA national meets the financial requirements for residency under the Directive.
EFTA Surveillance Authority’s notice on state aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for the EFTA States applicable as of 1 May 2025 – Published in accordance with the rules on reference and discount rates set out in Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL 14 July 2004
This notice from the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) announces the applicable interest rates for the recovery of unlawful state aid and the reference/discount rates for EFTA States, effective from May 1, 2025. These rates are crucial for ensuring fair competition within the European Economic Area (EEA) by counteracting the benefit that companies may have gained from illegal state support. The notice is published according to ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Decision No 195/04/COL.
**Structure and Main Provisions:**
The notice is structured very simply, it contains a brief introductory paragraph explaining the legal basis for the publication of these rates, referring to Part VII of ESA’s State Aid Guidelines and Article 10 of ESA’s Decision No 195/04/COL. It explicitly mentions that the base rates are calculated following the methodology outlined in ESA’s State Aid Guidelines, as amended by ESA’s Decision No 788/08/COL. The core of the notice is a table presenting the base rates for Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, effective from May 1, 2025.
**Main Provisions for Practical Use:**
The most important aspect of this notice is the specific base rates provided for each EFTA State:
* **Iceland:** 9,27 %
* **Liechtenstein:** 1,30 %
* **Norway:** 4,71 %
These base rates are the foundation for calculating the actual reference and recovery rates. To arrive at the applicable reference rates, appropriate margins, as defined in the State Aid Guidelines, must be added to these base rates, considering factors like the creditworthiness of the borrower and the available collateral. These rates are essential for determining the amount of interest to be charged on illegally granted state aid that needs to be recovered from beneficiaries. They also serve as a benchmark for calculating the discount rate applied to future cash flows in certain state aid assessments.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 11 April 2025 in the case of Saga Subsea AS v Akselsen and Granlund (Case E-6/25)
This document is a request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway. The request concerns the interpretation of Article 5 of Directive 2008/104/EC on temporary agency work. Specifically, the Supreme Court of Norway seeks clarification on whether Article 5 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive applies to employees of a temporary work agency domiciled in an EEA State when they are hired out to an undertaking also domiciled in the same EEA State, but working on board a vessel involved in petroleum activities on that State’s continental shelf. The EFTA Court’s opinion is sought to ensure consistent application of EU law within the EEA.
**Structure and Main Provisions:**
This document is structured as a formal request for an advisory opinion. It identifies the requesting court (Supreme Court of Norway), the case in question (Saga Subsea AS v Akselsen and Granlund), and the specific question referred to the EFTA Court. The core of the document is the precise question regarding the interpretation of Article 5 of Directive 2008/104/EC. There are no changes compared to previous versions as this is the initial request.
**Main Provisions for Use:**
The key provision for understanding the request is the question itself. It focuses on the scope of Article 5 of the Temporary Agency Work Directive in a specific context: temporary workers employed by an agency in an EEA state, working for a company in the same EEA state, but operating on a vessel involved in petroleum activities on the state’s continental shelf. This context raises questions about the applicability of the Directive in offshore environments and whether such work falls under the intended scope of the Directive’s protections for temporary agency workers.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections
This is a decision by the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding a Norwegian aid scheme for the development of a new floating offshore wind farm in Utsira Nord. The Authority has decided not to raise objections to this state aid measure. The scheme aims to support the development of cost-effective floating offshore wind projects through direct grants, with a total budget of NOK 35 billion. The aid intensity will be determined through a competitive bidding procedure, and the auction for the aid is scheduled for 2028-2029.
The decision provides key details about the aid scheme, including the date of adoption (April 15, 2025), the case number (93862), and the decision number (067/25/COL). It identifies Norway as the EFTA State providing the aid and specifies the legal basis as the Parliamentary Decision authorizing support for the wind farm development. The type of measure is defined as a scheme, with the objective of supporting cost-effective floating offshore wind projects. The aid will be provided as a direct grant, with the intensity determined by a competitive bidding process. The duration of the scheme is linked to the auction schedule in 2028-2029. The economic sector involved is the production of electricity from floating offshore wind (NACE D.35.1.1). The granting authority is the Ministry of Energy in Norway.
The most important provisions for potential users are the budget of NOK 35 billion available as direct grants, the competitive bidding procedure that will determine the aid intensity, and the timeline with the auction scheduled for 2028-2029. These elements will be crucial for companies interested in participating in the development of the floating offshore wind farm and accessing the available funding.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections
This is a decision by the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding a state aid measure implemented by Norway. The decision states that the Authority has no objections to amendments made to the Norwegian tax refund scheme for employing seafarers. The scheme aims to support the maritime transport sector through tax and social security refunds. The legal basis for the scheme is the Regulation on subsidies for the employment of workers at sea of 26 February 2016 No 204.
The decision provides key details about the state aid measure, including the date of adoption (30 April 2025), case number (93833), decision number (066/25/COL), the EFTA State (Norway), and the title of the measure (“Amendments to the Norwegian tax refund scheme for employing seafarers”). It identifies the objective as maritime transport and specifies that the aid is provided through tax and social security refunds. The granting authority is the Norwegian Maritime Authority. The decision refers to amendments to the existing scheme, implying that the scheme has been modified in some way. The specifics of these amendments are not detailed in this document but can be found in the authentic text of the decision available on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website.
The most important aspect of this decision is the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s approval of the amended Norwegian tax refund scheme. This means that the Authority has assessed the scheme and found it to be compatible with state aid rules, allowing Norway to continue providing these tax refunds to companies employing seafarers. For businesses operating in the Norwegian maritime transport sector, this decision confirms the continuation of financial support through the tax refund scheme.