Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Review of the EU legislation for 02/07/2026

    Please provide the text or the list of legal acts you would like me to analyze. As soon as you supply the specific legislative references, I will provide the requested brief and comprehensive review for each one, excluding any administrative matters such as appointments, resignations, or awards.

    Review of each of legal acts published today:

    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/450 of 27 February 2026 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 as regards the establishment of measures to ensure compliance with existing mitigation measures to reduce incidental catches of the resident population of the Baltic Proper harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the Baltic Sea


    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1022 of 30 June 2026 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 as regards definitions, customs declarations and data elements related to the temporary EUR 3 customs duty on distance sales of imported goods in a consignment with an intrinsic value not exceeding EUR 150


    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1421 of 30 June 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances bensulfuron, benzovindiflupyr, chlorotoluron, clethodim, cycloxydim, cymoxanil, dazomet, deltamethrin, diclofop, fenazaquin, fluopicolide, hymexazol, lambda-cyhalothrin, MCPA, MCPB, metaldehyde, metsulfuron-methyl, paclobutrazol and tebuconazole


    Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 1. Juli 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsgeschmacksmuster – Nichtigkeitsverfahren – Eingetragenes Unionsgeschmacksmuster, das einen Lampenschirm darstellt – Nichtigkeitsgrund – Nichterfüllung der Schutzvoraussetzungen – Art. 25 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 6/2002 – Fehlende Eigenart – Art. 6 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002 – Ermittlung des Sachverhalts von Amts wegen – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung Nr. 6/2002.#Rechtssache T-42/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods.Case T-361/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#KH contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Recrutement – Concours interne COM/AST4/2023 – Décision d’exclure le requérant du concours – Absence de participation à l’épreuve orale pour des raisons de santé – Devoir de sollicitude – Principe de bonne administration – Responsabilité – Préjudice moral.#Affaire T-415/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.Case T-654/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.Case T-173/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.Case T-591/24.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre élargie) du 1er juillet 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS et Marlink Events SAS contre Agence européenne de défense.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Fourniture de communications par satellite, d’équipements et services connexes – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Critères d’attribution – Obligation de motivation – Obligation d’examen des offres conforme aux critères énoncés dans les documents de marché – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Égalité de traitement – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Perte d’une chance – Indemnisation.#Affaire T-105/24.


    Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2026.Veikkaus Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.Case T-615/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.KJ and Others v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability.Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25.


    Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 July 2026.BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission.Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment.Case T-173/25.


    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.Case T-591/24.

    Leave a comment

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.