Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Ruling of the Grand Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the consolidation of constitutional proceedings in the case initiated by the constitutional complaint of Mykola Oleksandrovych Pysarenko regarding the compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of part five of Article 13 of the Law of Ukraine “On the Status of War Veterans, Guarantees of Their Social Protection” as amended by the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine Regarding One-Time Monetary Payment to War Veterans and Victims of Nazi Persecution” and in the case initiated by the constitutional complaint of Ihor Serhiyovych Nahayev

    Good day!

    1. **Essence of the Ruling:** This ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine concerns the consolidation of two constitutional proceedings into one. Both proceedings were initiated based on constitutional complaints from citizens regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On the Status of War Veterans, Guarantees of Their Social Protection,” namely part five of Article 13 as amended, which concerns a one-time monetary payment to war veterans. The Court decided that both complaints relate to the same issue, so it is advisable to consider them together.

    2. **Structure of the Ruling:**
    * **Introductory Part:** Contains information about the judges who participated in the consideration of the case, as well as a list of constitutional complaints being considered.
    * **Descriptive Part:** Describes the course of constitutional proceedings for each complaint separately, in particular, the decision to open proceedings and transition to a plenary session.
    * **Motivating Part:** Contains the justification for the decision to consolidate the cases into one proceeding, referring to the Law of Ukraine “On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.”
    * **Resolutive Part:** Contains the decision to consolidate the constitutional proceedings and transfer the case to the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, with the appointment of a reporting judge.

    3. **Key Provisions:**
    * Consolidation of constitutional proceedings occurs if they relate to the same or related issues.
    * In the event of consolidation of proceedings that are under consideration by different senates, the decision is made by the Grand Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.
    * The consolidated case is transferred to one of the senates, which is determined by the Grand Chamber.
    * The case concerns the social protection of war veterans, which is an important aspect of state policy.

    Full text by link

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.