Review of the EU legislation for 16/01/2026

EU Legislation Review

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/117

This regulation updates the rules for transhipment activities in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) area. It mandates that large-scale fishing vessels declare the International Maritime Organization (IMO) number for both the carrier and fishing vessels involved. The regulation also specifies that Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) must be used for recording the time of transhipment. The revised IOTC Transhipment Declaration form now includes fields for the IMO numbers of both vessels and a clarification on the use of UTC.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/50

This regulation amends rules concerning the data required for documents exchanged during the movement of excise goods. It updates Annex I of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636 to reflect changes in the computerised system used to track these movements, especially for goods exported outside the EU and those moved between Member States after being released for consumption. The changes aim to correct inconsistencies and update administrative documents, detailing the data groups, subgroups, and elements required for electronic messages related to excise goods movements.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/103

This regulation renews the authorization for the feed additive Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 for sows, categorized as a zootechnical additive that stabilizes gut flora. The regulation confirms the additive’s safety for sows, consumers, and the environment. Feed business operators must establish procedures to address potential risks, and personal protective equipment is required if risks cannot be eliminated. The authorization is renewed until 5 February 2036.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/104

This regulation amends the Union authorisation of the biocidal product family ‘Airedale PAA product family’. The changes are administrative and minor, including the addition of trade names, splitting of meta-SPCs, extension of shelf life, and reduction in contact time and in-use concentration. The regulation updates the summary of product characteristics, and these changes affect trade names, shelf life, contact time, and in-use concentration.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/114

This regulation imposes a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fused alumina from the People’s Republic of China. It sets specific duty rates for named companies and a general rate for all other imports. The regulation also establishes a duty-free tariff-rate quota, allowing a certain volume of fused alumina to be imported from China without duties. The quota’s volume, product types, and applicable periods are defined, with a gradual decrease in quota volume over five years. Provisional anti-dumping duties are collected at a level corresponding to 62.6% of the duty rates.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/96

This regulation authorizes the use of celery seed and caraway essential oils as sensory feed additives (flavouring compounds) for specific animal species, specifying maximum content levels. It requires these additives to be incorporated into feed as a premixture. Safety measures are mandated due to their potential irritant and sensitizing properties, with a withdrawal from the market for these feed additives for unauthorized species and categories. Existing stocks of feed and premixtures can continue to be used under transitional measures.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/101

This regulation defines the technical specifications for the decentralized IT system used for cross-border judicial procedures in civil, commercial, and criminal matters. Annex I outlines the technical aspects, including methods of communication, communication protocols, and security objectives. Annexes II-VII provide digital procedural standards for specific legal acts, while Annex VIII sets the implementation timetable for Member States and the Commission. This regulation is crucial for IT professionals and legal practitioners involved in setting up and using the decentralized IT system.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/93

This regulation authorizes the use of L-lysine sulphate produced with *Corynebacterium glutamicum* CGMCC 23982 as a feed additive for all animal species. It specifies a maximum content of 10,000 mg/kg in complete feed, requires labeling with storage conditions, heat treatment stability, and stability in water. Rumen protection is necessary for ruminants. Feed business operators must establish operational procedures and use personal protective equipment to address potential risks.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/98

This regulation amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/565 by updating the name of the authorization holder for a specific feed additive. The change is from “DSM Nutritional Products Ltd” to “dsm-firmenich Switzerland Ltd.” A transitional measure allows existing stocks of the feed additive produced and labeled under the previous name to continue being placed on the market and used until exhausted.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/119

This regulation imposes a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates originating in the People’s Republic of China. It establishes different duty rates for specific companies and a general duty rate for all other imports from China. The application of individual duty rates depends on presenting a valid commercial invoice with a specific declaration.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/95

This regulation mandates the withdrawal from the market of certain feed additives previously authorized for use in cat and dog food because the applications for their re-evaluation were withdrawn. It sets deadlines for the continued marketing and use of existing stocks, with the final deadline for feed materials and compound feed containing these additives being February 5, 2028.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/94

This regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, focusing on the rules for the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) concerning feed additive authorisation applications. It clarifies exceptions for supplying reference samples, introduces a mechanism for additional fees for the CRL, modifies the process for updating the list of national reference laboratories, and adjusts fee rates for certain types of applications.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/102

This regulation establishes the technical specifications for the European electronic access point (EEAP), a key component of the decentralized IT system for cross-border judicial cooperation. It defines standards for user identification, data exchange, and information storage. It requires electronic identification at assurance level “high,” the use of EU Login for authentication, a data retention period of five years, and compliance with web accessibility standards.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/124

This regulation amends Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, updating the price cap for Russian crude oil. Effective from 1 February 2026, the new price cap is set at 44,1 USD per barrel. This price cap is critical for companies involved in the maritime transport and related services of Russian crude oil to third countries.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/51

This regulation updates the structure of electronic messages used for exchanging data related to economic operators, tax warehouses, and excise duties within the EU, aligning with changes from Council Directive (EU) 2020/262. Annex I provides details on data element requirements, conditions for data use, and code lists for message formatting.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/90

This regulation authorizes the use of L-arginine produced with *Corynebacterium glutamicum* KCCM 80393 as a feed additive for all animal species. It sets purity standards, analytical methods, and specific warnings for users, including requirements for rumen protection and labels to avoid nutritional imbalances. Operators need to establish procedures and protective equipment to mitigate potential health risks.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/89

This regulation denies the renewal of authorization for smoke flavouring extract 2b0001 as a feed additive for dogs and cats, repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1076/2014 due to safety concerns. It mandates the withdrawal of the additive and products containing it from the market by specified deadlines, with a final withdrawal date for feed materials and compound feed by 4 August 2026.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/120

This regulation establishes representative prices, import duties, and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector starting from January 15, 2026. The import duties are set to 0 EUR per 100 kg net of the product concerned.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/85

This regulation authorizes tartrazine as a sensory feed additive to color fishing baits for freshwater food-producing finfish, excluding aquaculture. It specifies a maximum content of 30 mg/kg in complementary feed and mandates protective measures for users to mitigate health risks like skin, eye, and respiratory irritation.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/92

This regulation renews the authorization for Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 as a feed additive for laying hens and minor poultry species, and authorizes its use for other birds kept for egg production or breeding. The minimum content is 1 × 108 CFU/kg. Feed business operators must establish procedures and protective equipment to address potential risks for users. The authorization period ends on 4 February 2036.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/91

This regulation renews and extends the authorization of 6-phytase produced with Trichoderma reesei CBS 126897 as a feed additive for various animal species. It specifies conditions for its use, including minimum and maximum content, and emphasizes the need for protective measures to ensure user safety. Transitional measures allow for the continued use of products produced under the previous regulation.

UN Regulation No. 80

This UN Regulation provides the uniform provisions for the approval of seats in large passenger vehicles regarding the strength of the seats and their anchorages. The regulation specifies detailed test procedures and criteria to ensure that seats can withstand impact forces and protect passengers during collisions.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/112

This regulation establishes a fisheries closure for undulate ray in Union waters of ICES area 8 for vessels flying the flag of Spain, as the fishing quota allocated to Spain for undulate ray in that area for 2025 has been exhausted.

Court Decision: Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission

The Court upheld the lower court’s decision, finding that the business association’s appeal is inadmissible because it is not individually concerned by the Commission’s decision. This means the association has not demonstrated that the decision directly and significantly affects its members or its own interests.

Court Decision: XH v European Commission

The Court addressed whether the General Court correctly dismissed XH’s action. It examines the admissibility of challenging the decision to open an invalidity procedure and the merits of the claim regarding the rejection of her request for assistance. The Court of Justice upholds the General Court’s decision, finding no errors of law or distortions of facts and evidence.

Court Decision: Asylum Seekers – Access to Labor Market

The judgement clarifies the interpretation of Article 15(1) of Directive 2013/33/EU, which concerns access to the labor market for asylum seekers. The Court was asked to clarify what constitutes a delay attributable to the applicant when their asylum application processing is delayed, and how this impacts their right to work.

Court Decision: Restrictive Measures (Sanctions) Against Syria

The Court of Justice upholds the General Court’s decision to uphold the 2023 sanctions against Mr. Anbouba. The Court confirms that the criterion of “influential businessman operating in Syria” is a valid basis for imposing sanctions, even without demonstrating a direct link to the Syrian regime.

Court Decision: Italian Company, Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl and the Italian competition authority (AGCM)

The CJEU’s ruling, stating that Article 101 TFEU does not preclude national legislation allowing the national competition authority to extend the deadline for investigations, provided that such extensions are justified, subject to judicial review, and do not violate the reasonable time requirement.

Court Decision:Public Access to Environmental Information

Court Decision: Fair Compensation for Private Copying

Court Decision: Public Contract Can be Directly Awarded to a Legal Person

Court Decision: State Aid in the Postal Sector in Spain

The judgment clarifies the conditions under which an association can challenge state aid decisions and emphasizes that merely being an “interested party” is not sufficient to establish standing.

Court Decision: European Arrest Warrant

Court Decision: State Aid in the Postal Sector in Spain

The judgment emphasizes that an association seeking to challenge a Commission decision on State aid must demonstrate that its members’ position on the market is substantially affected by the aid. The judgment also clarifies that merely participating in the preliminary examination procedure before the Commission is not sufficient to establish standing.

Court Decision: Flight Cancellation

The Court of Justice ruled that the reimbursement should include the commission charged by the intermediary, even if the airline does not know the exact amount.

Court Decision:De Minimis Aid in the Agricultural Sector

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Crypto-Assets

The incorporation of these regulations extends the application of the EU’s crypto-asset regulatory framework to the EEA countries

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Fans Driven By Motors

The Decision also repeals Commission Regulation (EU) No 327/2011, which is being replaced, with effect from 24 July 2037.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Technical Regulations, Standards, Testing

The Decision ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the updated EU regulations concerning reporting requirements in Regulations (EU) No 1379/2013, (EU) No 167/2013, and (EU) No 168/2013.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Food Flavourings

The Decision ensures harmonized standards for flavourings within the EEA, impacting food producers and consumers.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : List of Air Carriers Banned

The Decision ensures that the EEA Agreement aligns with EU regulations regarding air carrier safety and operational standards.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Vehicle Emissions and Battery Durability

The Decision ensures that the latest standards for vehicle emissions and battery durability apply across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Publication of References for Construction Products

The Decision ensures that the updated EU regulations on technical standards for these products are also applicable within the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Short-Range Devices

The Decision ensures the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU regulations in electronic communication, audiovisual services, and information society.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Veterinary and Phytosanitary Matters

The Decision ensures the same standards for feedingstuffs apply within the European Economic Area. The Decision does not apply to Liechtenstein.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Dairy, Food Additives Derived from Animals

The Decision updates the EEA Agreement to reflect the latest EU regulations on veterinary and phytosanitary matters, as well as technical standards for specific food products.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Five Recent Commission Regulations related to the regulation of crypto-assets

The overall aim is to integrate these EU financial services regulations into the EEA Agreement, ensuring consistent regulation of crypto-assets across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Foodstuffs. The decision incorporates two Commission Regulations

The Decision adds new regulations to the EEA Agreement, ensuring that the EEA EFTA States (excluding Liechtenstein under specific conditions) align with the EU’s updated regulations on food additives.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement

This change aligns the EEA Agreement with the PEM Convention, streamlining the rules of origin applicable within the pan-Euro-Mediterranean region.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Ship Recycling Facilities

This inclusion ensures that ship recycling facilities within the EEA adhere to the standards set by the EU regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : CO2 emissions and fuel consumption

This ensures that the updated standards for determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy vehicles, including those using new technologies like hydrogen, are uniformly applied across the EEA, promoting environmental standards and fair competition.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Social security

The Decision incorporates Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems Decision No E8 into the EEA Agreement.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Active substances used in plant protection products

This ensures that the EEA countries adhere to the same standards as the EU in the regulation of plant protection products.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Harmonized indices of consumer prices and the house price index

This ensures that the classification of consumption and the inclusion of games of chance are harmonized within the EEA for statistical purposes.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Variables Related to Digital Platform Employment

EEA member states are now obligated to collect and report data on digital platform employment according to the variables specified in the incorporated regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options related to commodity risk

The updated standards for calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options mapped to the commodity risk category, as specified in the incorporated regulation now is applied to the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Marine Equipment

Manufacturers and suppliers of marine equipment within the EEA must comply with the design, construction, performance, and testing standards outlined in Regulation 2025/1533.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Taxonomy for the single electronic reporting format

This ensures consistent financial reporting standards across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Active and Basic substances used in plant protection products

The Decision concerns the approval and extension of approval periods for various active substances and basic substances used in plant protection products.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Feed Additive Sepiolite

It incorporates the EU regulation on feed additives into the EEA Agreement

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Prohibited or Restricted Antimicrobials

It makes the restrictions and prohibitions on the use of certain antimicrobials, as detailed in Regulation (EU) 2024/1973, now apply within the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Recognition of control bodies for organic products

This inclusion ensures that the updated list of recognized control bodies for organic products is legally binding within the EEA, affecting businesses involved in the import of organic products from third countries into the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Correcting Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2055

This inclusion ensures consistent regulatory oversight and cooperation across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Extends rules concerning the food additive cellulos

This means that the rules and standards set out in Regulation (EU) 2025/666 regarding the specified food additives will now also be legally binding in the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :List of high-risk third countries

EEA, impacting financial institutions and other entities subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations within the EEA member states

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Extends deferred application date for certain clearing obligations and risk management procedures for OTC derivative contracts

provides continued relief from certain regulatory obligations

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Imports Of Animal and Animal Products

This regulation directly impacts which third countries are authorized to export certain animals and animal products into the EEA

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Joint scientific consultations on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

This inclusion ensures consistent regulatory oversight and cooperation across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Inspections of slaughterhouses

Regulation on ante- and post-mortem inspections to the EEA countries (excluding Liechtenstein).

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Emissions Trading System (ETS)

The adaptation regarding the jurisdiction of the EFTA Court is also significant, as it clarifies the legal avenues available within the EEA framework.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Information to be notified to ship reporting systems

This ensures that the updated requirements for information to be notified to ship reporting systems are also applicable within the EEA

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Environmental regulations, particularly regarding ship recycling

The Decision addresses list of ship recycling facilities. It will ensure that ship recycling facilities within the EEA adhere to the standards set by the EU regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Concerning the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements

Businesses and individuals within the EEA must comply with the requirements set out in the regulations. Liechtenstein is excluded from the application of this Decision

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Detailed rules for calculating price differences between eligible aviation fuels and fossil kerosene
Regulations will now also apply within the EEA, impacting aviation fuel suppliers and operators within the EEA countries.

Review of each of legal acts published today:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/117 of 3 November 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2022/2343 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) Area of Competence, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1936/2001, (EC) No 1984/2003 and (EC) No 520/2007

This Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/117 amends Regulation (EU) 2022/2343, which concerns management, conservation, and control measures within the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) Area of Competence. The key purpose of this amendment is to incorporate new requirements established by IOTC Resolutions 22/02 and 25/05 regarding transhipment activities by large-scale fishing vessels (LSTV). These resolutions mandate the declaration of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) number for both the carrier and fishing vessels involved, and the use of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) for recording the time of transhipment.

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 stipulates that Annex 7 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2343, which contains the IOTC Transhipment Declaration form, is replaced by the new form provided in the Annex to this regulation. Article 2 states that the regulation will come into force three days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The main change introduced by this regulation is the updated Annex 7, the IOTC Transhipment Declaration form. The revised form now includes fields for the IMO number of both the carrier and fishing vessels. Additionally, a footnote has been added to clarify that UTC should be used for indicating the time and date of transhipment on the declaration.

The most important provision of this act is the revised Annex 7, which introduces mandatory fields for the IMO numbers of both the carrier and fishing vessels involved in transhipment, as well as the clarification on the use of UTC for time recording. Operators of large-scale fishing vessels and carrier vessels involved in transhipment within the IOTC Area of Competence must use the new declaration form.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/50 of 12 November 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636 as regards the data of the documents exchanged in the context of movement of excise goods

This is a description of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/50.

This regulation amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636, focusing on the data required for documents exchanged during the movement of excise goods. The changes are necessary due to modifications in the computerised system used to track these movements, particularly concerning goods exported outside the EU and those moved between Member States after being released for consumption. The amendment aims to correct inconsistencies and update the structure and content of administrative documents to reflect these changes. The regulation updates Annex I of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636, which details the messages used for movements of excise goods under suspension of excise duty or already released for consumption.

The regulation consists of two articles. Article 1 stipulates that Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to the new regulation. Article 2 states the regulation’s entry into force is on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and its application from 12 February 2026. The main body of the act is the revised Annex I, which provides detailed tables outlining the data groups, subgroups, and elements required for electronic messages related to excise goods movements. These tables specify whether data is required, optional, conditional, or dependent, along with conditions for use, explanations, and data characteristics like type and length. The annex includes tables for various scenarios, such as draft electronic administrative documents, cancellation messages, change of destination messages, splitting operations, and reports of receipt or export.

The most important provisions for users are the updated data requirements in Annex I, which detail the specific information needed for electronic messages related to excise goods movements. Businesses involved in the movement of excise goods need to carefully review these requirements to ensure compliance with the updated computerised system. This includes understanding the conditions for providing certain data, the codes to be used, and the formats for different data elements.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/103 of 15 January 2026 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation of Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 as a feed additive for sows (holder of authorisation: Lactosan GmbH&Co.KG) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1083/2014

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/103 concerns the renewal of the authorization for the feed additive Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 for sows, and repeals the previous Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1083/2014. The additive is categorized as a zootechnical additive and functions as a gut flora stabilizer. The regulation confirms the safety of the additive for sows, consumers, and the environment, while also addressing potential risks to users through protective measures.

The regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 renews the authorization of Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 as a feed additive for sows, subject to the conditions outlined in the annex. Article 2 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1083/2014, which previously authorized the additive. Article 3 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex specifies the identification number, authorization holder, name of the additive, composition, analytical method, animal species, and other provisions, including storage conditions, heat treatment, and protective measures for users.

The most important provisions for users include the obligation for feed business operators to establish operational procedures and organizational measures to address potential risks. If these risks cannot be eliminated, personal protective equipment (eye, breathing, and skin protection) must be used. The regulation also specifies the minimum content of Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 in complete feed and sets the end of the authorization period as 5 February 2036.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/104 of 8 December 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1200 as regards administrative and minor changes to the Union authorisation of the biocidal product family Airedale PAA product family

This is a description of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/104, which amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1200. The amendment concerns the Union authorisation of the biocidal product family ‘Airedale PAA product family’. The changes are administrative and minor, including the addition of trade names, splitting of meta-SPCs, extension of shelf life, and reduction in contact time and in-use concentration. The Commission agrees with the European Chemicals Agency’s (ECHA) opinions that these changes meet the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.

The structure of the act is straightforward. It consists of a preamble that outlines the reasons for the amendment, followed by two articles. Article 1 replaces the annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1200 with a new text containing the updated summary of product characteristics for the ‘Airedale PAA product family’. Article 2 states that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex contains detailed information about the biocidal product family, including administrative information, product composition, hazard and precautionary statements, authorised uses, and general directions for use.

The main provisions of the act that may be the most important for its use are those related to the changes in the summary of product characteristics. These changes affect the trade names of the product, the shelf life, contact time and in-use concentration.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/114 of 15 January 2026 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of fused alumina originating in the People’s Republic of China

This is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/114, which imposes a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fused alumina originating in the People’s Republic of China. This regulation follows an anti-dumping investigation initiated in November 2024 after a complaint by Imerys S.A. on behalf of the Union industry of fused alumina. The regulation also finalizes the collection of provisional duties that were previously imposed.

The regulation is structured into several sections, covering the procedure, product definition, dumping determination, injury assessment, causation analysis, level of measures, Union interest, and definitive anti-dumping measures. It details the steps taken during the investigation, including the imposition of provisional measures, subsequent procedures, and claims made by various parties. Key changes from the provisional regulation include adjustments to dumping margins based on revised calculations of SG&A costs and profits, and the introduction of a duty-free tariff-rate quota.

The most important provisions of this act include:
– Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties on fused alumina from China, with specific duty rates for named companies and a general rate for all other imports.
– Establishment of a duty-free tariff-rate quota, which allows a certain volume of fused alumina to be imported from China without duties, aimed at balancing the interests of Union producers and users.
– Definition of the quota’s volume, product types, and applicable periods, with a gradual decrease in quota volume over a five-year period.
– Conditions for the application of individual duty rates, requiring a valid commercial invoice with a specific declaration.
– Provisions for new exporting producers to request the application of lower duty rates if they meet certain criteria.
– Definitive collection of provisional anti-dumping duties at a level corresponding to 62.6% of the duty rates established in the regulation.
– Rejection of retroactive collection of duties due to the absence of a substantial rise in imports following the initiation of the investigation.
– **** These measures may affect Ukrainian companies that import fused alumina from China or compete with Chinese exports in the EU market.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/96 of 15 January 2026 concerning the authorisation of celery seed essential oil from Apium graveolens L. and caraway essential oil from Carum carvi L. as feed additives for certain animal species

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/96 authorises the use of celery seed essential oil from Apium graveolens L. and caraway essential oil from Carum carvi L. as sensory feed additives (flavouring compounds) for specific animal species. It specifies maximum content levels for these additives in complete feed and outlines conditions for their use, including safety measures for users due to their potential irritant and sensitising properties. The Regulation also mandates the withdrawal from the market of these feed additives for animal species and categories not included in the authorisation. Transitional measures are provided to allow the continued use of existing stocks of feed and premixtures.

The Regulation consists of 5 articles and an Annex. Article 1 authorises the substances specified in the Annex as additives in animal nutrition, subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex. Article 2 stipulates that the feed additives celery seed essential oil from Apium graveolens L. and caraway essential oil from Carum carvi L., as authorised pursuant to Directive 70/524/EEC, shall be withdrawn from the market in respect of the animal species and categories other than those mentioned in the Annex. Articles 3 and 4 define transitional measures related to the authorisation and withdrawal from the market, respectively, allowing for the continued use and placing on the market of existing stocks under certain conditions and deadlines. Article 5 states that the Regulation enters into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex specifies the identification number and name of the additive, its composition, the animal species or category for which it is authorised, and the maximum content allowed in feed.

Key provisions include the specific maximum content levels for each additive depending on the animal species, the requirement for incorporation into feed as a premixture, and the safety measures for handling the additives due to their potential to cause skin and eye irritation, as well as respiratory sensitisation. The Regulation also allows for mixtures of these essential oils with other botanical additives, provided that the levels of certain substances of concern (perillaldehyde and furocoumarins) remain below specified limits.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/101 of 15 January 2026 on setting out the technical specifications and other requirements for the decentralised IT system, as referenced in Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in relation to the procedures established by the legal acts listed in points 3 and 4 of Annex I, the legal acts listed in points 1, 10 and 11 of Annex II to that Regulation, and to the procedure established by Article 19a of Regulation (EU) 2020/1784 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as introduced by Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 of the European Parliament and of the Council for the electronic service of documents through the European electronic access point

Here’s a breakdown of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/101:

**1. Essence of the Act:**

This regulation sets out the technical specifications and other requirements for the decentralized IT system that will be used for cross-border judicial procedures in civil, commercial, and criminal matters. It specifies how Member States should implement this system to ensure secure, efficient, and interoperable communication. The regulation aims to facilitate the digitalization of judicial cooperation and access to justice within the EU. It builds upon existing systems like e-CODEX to create a comprehensive Justice Digital Exchange System (JUDEX).

**2. Structure and Main Provisions:**

The regulation is structured around defining the technical aspects of the decentralized IT system mandated by Regulation (EU) 2023/2844.

* **Article 1 (Scope):** Specifies which legal acts and procedures the regulation applies to, including regulations on European order for payment, European Small Claims Procedure, Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant, Directive regarding the European Investigation Order, Regulation on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders, and the procedure for electronic service of documents.
* **Article 2:** States that the technical specifications, measures, and objectives of the decentralized IT system are detailed in Annex I.
* **Articles 3-8:** Define the digital procedural standards for each of the legal acts mentioned in Article 1, with specifics in Annexes II-VII. These standards cover business process models and data schemas for electronic data exchange.
* **Article 9:** Sets out the implementation timetable, detailed in Annex VIII.
* **Article 10:** Specifies the entry into force of the regulation.

**Annex I** outlines the technical specifications, measures, and objectives of the decentralized IT system. This includes methods of communication, communication protocols, information security objectives, minimum availability objectives, and the setup of a Competent courts (authorities) database (CDB).

**Annexes II-VII** provide detailed digital procedural standards for each specific legal act, including business process models and data schemas.

**Annex VIII** provides the implementation timetable for the Member States and the Commission.

**3. Main Provisions for Use:**

* **Technical Specifications (Annex I):** This annex is crucial for IT professionals and legal practitioners involved in setting up and using the decentralized IT system. It details the technical requirements for secure communication, data integrity, and system availability.
* **Digital Procedural Standards (Annexes II-VII):** These annexes are essential for understanding how to structure and exchange data electronically for specific legal procedures. They provide the framework for interoperable data exchange through the e-CODEX system.
* **Implementation Timetable (Annex VIII):** This timetable is important for Member States to ensure timely compliance with the regulation and the broader digitalization efforts in judicial cooperation.

****

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/93 of 15 January 2026 concerning the authorisation of L-lysine sulphate produced with Corynebacterium glutamicum CGMCC 23982 as a feed additive for all animal species

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/93 authorises the use of L-lysine sulphate produced with Corynebacterium glutamicum CGMCC 23982 as a feed additive for all animal species. The additive is classified as a nutritional additive, specifically an amino acid, its salt, or analogue. The regulation sets conditions for its use, including maximum content levels and labeling requirements, to ensure animal and user safety.

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the substance specified in the Annex is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition, subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex. Article 2 indicates when the regulation enters into force. The Annex specifies the identification number, name of the additive, composition, analytical method, the animal species for which it is intended, and other provisions, including the end of the authorisation period.

Key provisions of the regulation include: a maximum content of 10 000 mg/kg of complete feed with 12% moisture content; requirements for labeling the additive and premixtures with storage conditions, heat treatment stability, and stability in water; a requirement to ensure rumen protection when fed to ruminants; a warning to consider all essential amino acids to avoid nutritional imbalances, especially when using water for drinking; and the need for feed business operators to establish operational procedures and use personal protective equipment to address potential risks.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/98 of 15 January 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/565 as regards the name of the holder of the authorisation for feed additives

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/98 amends Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/565, focusing solely on updating the name of the authorization holder for a specific feed additive. The change is from “DSM Nutritional Products Ltd, represented in the Union by DSM Nutritional Products Sp. z o.o.” to “dsm-firmenich Switzerland Ltd., represented in the EU by dsm-firmenich Austria GmbH.” This amendment is purely administrative, reflecting a change in the company’s name and representation within the EU, without affecting the additive’s composition or safety assessment.

The regulation consists of three articles. Article 1 directly amends Regulation (EU) 2022/565 by replacing the old name of the authorization holder with the new one in both the title and the relevant table within the Annex. Article 2 provides a transitional measure, allowing existing stocks of the feed additive produced and labeled under the previous name to continue being placed on the market and used until exhausted. Article 3 specifies that the regulation will enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision for practical use is the transitional measure outlined in Article 2. This allows for the continued use of existing stocks labeled with the previous company name, preventing immediate disruption in the market and minimizing potential economic losses for distributors and users of the feed additive.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/99 of 15 January 2026 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council

This is a Commission Implementing Regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates (persulphates) originating in the People’s Republic of China. The regulation follows an expiry review, which assessed whether the existing anti-dumping measures should be maintained. The review concluded that the expiry of the measures would likely lead to a recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.

The regulation consists of 7 articles and several recitals providing context and justification for the measures. It details the procedure, the products involved, the likelihood of recurrence of dumping, the injury analysis, the Union interest, and the anti-dumping measures themselves. The regulation relies on Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, the basic regulation on protection against dumped imports.

The most important provisions of the act are:
– Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of peroxosulphates originating in the People’s Republic of China.
– Establishes different duty rates for specific companies (ABC Chemicals (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai and United Initiators Shanghai Co., Ltd.) and a general duty rate for all other imports from China.
– Conditions the application of individual duty rates on the presentation of a valid commercial invoice with a specific declaration.
– Specifies that the regulation will enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/95 of 15 January 2026 withdrawing from the market oct-2-enal, dec-2-enal, 2-hexenal, 3,5- octadiene-2-one, dec-2-enoic acid, phenethyl propionate, methyl decanoate, ethyl dec-2-enoate, ethyl dec-4-enoate, butylamine, 3-methylbutane-1-thiol, 2-methylfuran, 2-acetyl-5-methylfuran, 2-acetyl-3-methylpyrazine and picoline beta (3-methylpyridine) as feed additives for cats and dogs

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/95 addresses the withdrawal from the market of certain feed additives previously authorized for use in cat and dog food. The regulation mandates the removal of these additives because the applications for their re-evaluation were withdrawn. It aims to ensure that feed additives used in animal nutrition are continuously reviewed and meet current safety standards.

The regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 orders the withdrawal from the market of the feed additives specified in the Annex for cats and dogs. Article 2 provides transitional measures, setting deadlines for the continued marketing and use of existing stocks of the additives, premixtures, compound feed, and feed materials containing these additives. Article 3 states the date of entry into force of the regulation. The Annex lists the specific feed additives being withdrawn, including their identification numbers, names, and CAS numbers. There are no changes compared to previous versions, as this is the initial regulation implementing the withdrawal.

The most important provisions are the deadlines outlined in Article 2, which allow a phase-out period for the use of the affected feed additives. Specifically, existing stocks of the feed additives can be placed on the market and used until February 5, 2027. Premixtures produced with these additives can be marketed and used until May 5, 2027, and compound feed and feed materials containing the additives or premixtures can be marketed and used until February 5, 2028.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/94 of 15 January 2026 amending Regulation (EC) No 378/2005 as regards reference samples, fees, evaluation reports and the national reference laboratories

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/94 amends Regulation (EC) No 378/2005, focusing on the rules for the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) concerning feed additive authorisation applications. The changes affect reference samples, fees, evaluation reports, and the network of national reference laboratories. The goal is to streamline procedures, clarify existing rules, and reduce unnecessary administrative burdens for both the CRL and national reference laboratories.

The Regulation modifies several articles and annexes of Regulation (EC) No 378/2005. Key changes include: clarifying exceptions for supplying reference samples, introducing a mechanism for additional fees for the CRL, modifying the process for updating the list of national reference laboratories, and adjusting fee rates for certain types of applications. Specifically, it amends Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12, and Annexes I and IV, while deleting Annex II.

The most important provisions for users are those concerning reference samples and fees. The regulation extends the exceptions for supplying reference samples to include certain applications for renewal of existing authorisations. It also introduces a procedure for the CRL to charge additional fees if extra work is required due to developments after the application submission, with a mechanism for applicants to contest these fees. Furthermore, the regulation modifies the fee structure for changes to existing authorisations and renewals, depending on whether reference samples are required.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/102 of 15 January 2026 on setting out the technical specifications for the European electronic access point, as referenced in Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 of the European Parliament and of the Council

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/102 establishes the technical specifications for the European electronic access point (EEAP), which is a key component of the decentralized IT system designed to facilitate cross-border judicial cooperation in civil, commercial, and criminal matters. The regulation ensures that individuals and legal entities can effectively access justice across borders by defining the technical standards for user identification, data exchange, and information storage within the EEAP. It aims to streamline the process of filing claims, sending requests, receiving information, and communicating with competent authorities in different Member States.

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 specifies that the technical specifications for the EEAP, including user electronic identification means and data retention periods, are detailed in the Annex. Article 2 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex provides detailed technical specifications for the EEAP, covering aspects such as methods of communication, communication protocols, service availability, connection to the Competent courts (authorities) database (CDB), electronic identification of users, data retention periods, and web accessibility requirements.

The most important provisions of this regulation are those outlined in the Annex, which define the practical implementation of the EEAP. Specifically, the requirements for electronic identification at assurance level “high” as per Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, the use of EU Login for authentication, the data retention period of five years after the closure of a case, and the compliance with web accessibility standards are crucial for ensuring secure, user-friendly, and efficient cross-border judicial cooperation. These technical specifications are essential for the EEAP to function effectively as a part of the broader decentralized IT system.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/124 of 14 January 2026 amending Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/124 amends Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, which concerns restrictive measures against Russia due to its actions destabilizing the situation in Ukraine. The key focus of this amendment is to adjust the price cap for Russian crude oil, which is a mechanism designed to limit Russia’s oil revenues while ensuring stable energy supplies to third countries. The regulation updates Annex XXVIII of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 to reflect the new price cap.

The structure of the regulation is straightforward: it consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that Annex XXVIII to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 is amended as set out in the Annex to the new regulation. Article 2 specifies that the regulation will come into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Annex contains the updated price for crude oil. The previous price per barrel was 47,6 USD, and it is now updated to 44,1 USD, starting from 1 February 2026.

**** The most important provision of this regulation is the updated price cap for Russian crude oil, set at 44,1 USD per barrel, effective from 1 February 2026. This price cap is crucial for companies involved in the maritime transport and related services of Russian crude oil to third countries, as it determines the conditions under which they can operate without violating EU sanctions.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/51 of 11 December 2025 amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 612/2013 as regards the structure of messages relating to data of economic operators and tax warehouses, related statistics and reporting in the field of excise duties exchanged pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012

This is a description of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/51 amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 612/2013.

The essence of this regulation is to update the structure of electronic messages used for exchanging data related to economic operators, tax warehouses, and excise duties within the EU. These updates are necessary to align with changes introduced by Council Directive (EU) 2020/262, which expanded the computerised system for monitoring excise goods movements. The amendments address obsolete data elements and inconsistencies identified in the existing system, ensuring accurate and efficient data exchange among Member States. The regulation aims to improve the functioning of the electronic registers of authorised economic operators and tax warehouses.

**Structure and Main Provisions:**

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex.

* **Article 1** stipulates that Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 612/2013 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this regulation. The annex contains the updated structure of electronic messages used for the maintenance of the register of economic operators.
* **Article 2** defines the entry into force and the date of application of the regulation. It specifies that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall apply from 12 February 2026.

The main body of the changes is in the **Annex I**, which provides detailed explanatory notes and tables describing the electronic messages used for maintaining the register of economic operators. These tables outline the data elements, their attributes (required, optional, conditional), and the conditions for their use. The annex includes specific tables for:

* Common request messages for various data types (reference data, statistics, etc.).
* Operations on the register of economic operators (updates, disseminations, retrievals, extractions).
* Refusal of update of economic operators.
* SEED statistics.

**Key Provisions for Practical Use:**

The most important provisions for users of this regulation are within **Annex I**, which details the structure and requirements for electronic messages. Key aspects to note include:

* **Data Element Requirements:** Understanding whether a data element is ‘Required,’ ‘Optional,’ or ‘Conditional’ is crucial for ensuring that messages are correctly formatted and accepted by the system.
* **Conditions for Data Use:** Column E in the tables provides conditions for data use, specifying when certain data elements are required based on other data elements in the message.
* **Code Lists:** The regulation refers to various code lists (e.g., country codes, excise product codes) that must be used to ensure data consistency and validity. These code lists are primarily found in Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636.
* **Message Types:** Different message types are defined for various operations (e.g., updating economic operators, requesting statistics), and each type has specific data requirements.
* **Action Codes:** When performing operations on the register (create, update, invalidate, delete), the correct action code must be used.
* **Temporary Authorisations:** The regulation includes specific provisions for temporary authorisations, including details on linking traders and specifying excise product details.
* **Error Handling:** The table on “Refusal of Update of Economic Operators” provides a list of possible error codes and reasons, which is essential for troubleshooting issues with message submissions.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/90 of 14 January 2026 concerning the authorisation of L-arginine produced with Corynebacterium glutamicum KCCM 80393 as a feed additive for all animal species

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/90 authorises the use of L-arginine produced with *Corynebacterium glutamicum* KCCM 80393 as a feed additive for all animal species. The additive is classified as a nutritional additive, specifically an amino acid, its salts, and analogues. The regulation establishes the conditions for its use, including purity standards, analytical methods, and specific warnings for users.

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 states that the substance specified in the annex is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition, subject to the conditions laid down in that annex. Article 2 specifies that the regulation comes into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex specifies the identification number, name of the additive, composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method, animal species, minimum and maximum content, other provisions and end of period of authorisation.

The most important provisions of this regulation are those outlined in the Annex. These include the specifications for the additive’s composition (L-arginine ≥ 98,5 % on a dry matter basis), the authorized uses for all animal species, and the absence of a specified maximum content. Furthermore, the regulation mandates specific instructions for use, including indicating storage conditions and stability to heat treatment, and requires feed business operators to ensure rumen protection when fed to ruminants. It also requires a label warning about potential nutritional imbalances when supplementing with L-arginine, especially via drinking water, and mandates operational procedures and protective equipment for users to mitigate potential health risks.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/89 of 14 January 2026 concerning the denial of the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation containing a smoke flavouring extract-2b0001 as a feed additive for dogs and cats and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1076/2014

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/89 concerns the denial of the renewal of the authorisation for a specific smoke flavouring extract, labelled 2b0001, as a feed additive for dogs and cats. The regulation also repeals the previous Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1076/2014, which had authorised the use of this additive. The decision is based on safety concerns raised by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), particularly regarding the potential genotoxicity of certain components of the additive.

The regulation consists of four articles. Article 1 explicitly denies the renewal of authorisation for the smoke flavouring extract-2b0001 as a feed additive for dogs and cats. Article 2 repeals the previous authorisation, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1076/2014. Article 3 outlines the timeline for the withdrawal of the additive and products containing it from the market. Stocks of the additive and related premixtures intended for dogs and cats must be withdrawn by 4 May 2026, while feed materials and compound feed produced with the additive before that date must be withdrawn by 4 August 2026. Article 4 states that the regulation will come into force twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The key provisions of this regulation are the denial of the renewal of the authorisation for smoke flavouring extract-2b0001 as a feed additive for dogs and cats, and the mandated withdrawal of the additive and products containing it from the market within specified deadlines. This regulation is important for feed manufacturers, distributors, and retailers involved in products for dogs and cats, as it requires them to remove the specified smoke flavouring additive from their products and cease its distribution within the EU.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/120 of 13 January 2026 fixing the representative prices, import duties and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector from 15 January 2026

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/120 sets out the representative prices, import duties, and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector for the period starting from January 15, 2026. It aims to ensure fair access to the EU market for imported molasses by adjusting duties based on market prices. The regulation repeals the previous Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2657.

The regulation consists of three articles and an annex. Article 1 specifies that the representative prices, import duties, and additional import duties for molasses under CN codes 1703 10 00 and 1703 90 00 are those listed in the annex. Article 2 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2657. Article 3 states that the regulation will enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex provides a table with specific amounts in EUR for representative prices, import duties, and additional duties for the two mentioned CN codes.

The most important provision is Article 1 in conjunction with the Annex, which directly sets the financial terms (representative prices and duties) for importing molasses into the EU. This information is crucial for businesses involved in the import of molasses, as it directly affects the cost of importing these goods. The import duties are set to 0 EUR per 100 kg net of the product concerned.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/85 of 14 January 2026 concerning the authorisation of tartrazine as a feed additive for its use in baits for freshwater food-producing finfish

This Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/85 authorises the use of tartrazine as a sensory feed additive to colour fishing baits for freshwater food-producing finfish. It specifies that tartrazine falls under the category of ‘sensory additives’ and the functional group of ‘colourants’ used to add or restore colour in feedingstuffs. The regulation emphasizes that tartrazine is intended solely for use in fishing baits to attract fish in freshwater environments and is strictly prohibited for use in aquaculture. It also outlines conditions for use, including protective measures for users due to its potential as a dermal and respiratory sensitiser.

The regulation consists of two articles and an annex. Article 1 sanctions the use of tartrazine as a feed additive under the conditions specified in the annex. Article 2 states that the regulation will take effect twenty days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The annex specifies the identification number, name, composition, analytical method, target species, and maximum content of tartrazine in complementary feed. It also includes other provisions, such as the requirement for feed business operators to establish operational procedures and organizational measures to address potential risks resulting from the use of tartrazine.

The most important provisions of this act are those that outline the specific conditions of use for tartrazine. These include the maximum permitted content of 30 mg/kg in complementary feed, the restriction of its use solely to fishing baits (excluding aquaculture), and the requirement for users to implement protective measures to mitigate health risks such as skin, eye, and respiratory irritation. The regulation also mandates that the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment must be indicated in the directions for use of the additive and premixture.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/92 of 14 January 2026 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 as a feed additive for laying hens and minor poultry species for laying, the authorisation of a preparation of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 as a feed additive for other birds kept for egg production or breeding (holder of authorisation: Kemin Europa N.V.) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1020

This is a description of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/92.

**Essence of the Act:**

This regulation renews the authorization for the feed additive Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 for laying hens and minor poultry species, while also authorizing its use for other birds kept for egg production or breeding. It classifies the additive as a zootechnical additive for gut flora stabilization. The regulation updates the minimum concentration of the additive and sets conditions for its use, including safety measures for users.

**Structure and Main Provisions:**

The regulation consists of 5 articles and an annex.

* **Article 1** renews the authorization of Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 for laying hens and minor poultry species for laying, under the conditions specified in the annex.
* **Article 2** authorizes the use of the same preparation as a feed additive for other birds kept for egg production or breeding, also subject to the conditions in the annex.
* **Article 3** repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1020, which previously authorized the additive.
* **Article 4** outlines transitional measures, allowing for the continued use of products produced and labeled under the previous regulation for a limited time.
* **Article 5** states the regulation’s entry into force.

The annex specifies the identification number, name of the authorization holder, name of the additive, composition, analytical method, target animal species, minimum and maximum content in feed, other provisions, and the end date of the authorization period. It also includes requirements for storage, heat treatment, and safety measures for users of the additive.

**Main Provisions for Use:**

* The feed additive Bacillus velezensis ATCC PTA-6737 is authorized as a zootechnical additive (gut flora stabilizer) for laying hens, minor poultry species for laying, and other birds kept for egg production or breeding.
* The minimum content of the additive in complete feed is 1 × 108 CFU/kg.
* Feed business operators must establish operational procedures and organizational measures to address potential risks for users of the additive and premixtures. Personal breathing and skin protective equipment must be used if risks cannot be eliminated.
* The authorization period ends on 4 February 2036.
* The regulation includes transitional measures allowing the continued use of products produced and labelled under the previous regulation for a limited time.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/91 of 14 January 2026 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation of 6-phytase produced with Trichoderma reesei CBS 126897 as a feed additive for poultry, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, the authorisation of a preparation of 6-phytase produced with Trichoderma reesei CBS 126897 as a feed additive for ornamental birds, suckling piglets and minor porcine species (holder of authorisation: AB Enzymes Finland Oy) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 292/2014

This is a description of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/91, which concerns the authorization and renewal of a feed additive for animals.

The regulation renews the authorization of 6-phytase produced with Trichoderma reesei CBS 126897 as a feed additive for poultry, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening, and sows. It also authorizes its use for ornamental birds, suckling piglets, and minor porcine species. The regulation repeals the previous Implementing Regulation (EU) No 292/2014, which initially authorized the additive for certain animal categories.

The regulation consists of 5 articles and an annex. Article 1 renews the authorization of the additive for poultry, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening, and sows. Article 2 authorizes the use of the additive for ornamental birds, suckling piglets, and minor porcine species. Article 3 repeals Implementing Regulation (EU) No 292/2014. Article 4 provides transitional measures for products already on the market. Article 5 states the regulation’s entry into force. The annex specifies the identification number, name of the authorization holder, name of the additive, composition, analytical method, animal species, minimum and maximum content, and other provisions, including the end date of the authorization.

Key provisions include the renewal and extension of the authorization for the feed additive, specifying its use for additional animal species. The regulation sets specific conditions for the use of the additive, including the minimum and maximum content in feed, and emphasizes the need for protective measures to ensure the safety of users handling the additive. The transitional measures are also important, as they allow for the continued use of products produced under the previous regulation for a limited time, ensuring a smooth transition to the new requirements.

UN Regulation No. 80 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of seats of large passenger vehicles and of these vehicles with regard to the strength of the seats and their anchorages [2026/54]

This is a description of UN Regulation No. 80, which concerns the uniform provisions for the approval of seats in large passenger vehicles, as well as the approval of these vehicles regarding the strength of the seats and their anchorages. The regulation aims to ensure passenger safety by setting standards for seat strength and installation in vehicles of categories M2 and M3 (Classes II, III, and B).

The regulation is structured into 13 main sections, covering aspects such as scope, definitions, application for approval, approval process, requirements for seats and their anchorages, installation guidelines, conformity of production, penalties for non-conformity, modification and extension of approval, discontinuation of production, transitional provisions, and contact information for technical services and approval authorities. It also includes several appendices detailing specific test procedures, measurement techniques, and acceptability criteria. The regulation has been amended several times, with the latest being the 04 series of amendments.

The most important provisions of this regulation relate to the specific requirements for seats and seat anchorages. These include dynamic and static testing requirements, energy absorption characteristics, and installation conditions, particularly for side-facing seats. The regulation specifies detailed test procedures and criteria to ensure that seats can withstand impact forces and protect passengers during collisions. Additionally, the regulation outlines the approval process and the conditions under which approvals can be granted, extended, or withdrawn, as well as the obligations of manufacturers to ensure conformity of production.

Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/112 of 9 January 2026 establishing a fisheries closure for undulate ray in Union waters of 8 for vessels flying the flag of Spain

This Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/112 establishes a fisheries closure for undulate ray in Union waters of ICES area 8 for vessels flying the flag of Spain. It declares that the fishing quota allocated to Spain for undulate ray in that area for 2025 has been exhausted. As a result, the regulation prohibits fishing for undulate ray by Spanish vessels in the specified area from the date indicated in the Annex.

The Regulation consists of 3 articles and an annex. Article 1 states quota exhaustion. Article 2 lays down prohibitions. It is forbidden to fish for the stock by vessels flying the flag of Spain from the date set out in the Annex, including searching for fish or setting fishing gear. However, transshipping, retaining on board, processing, transferring, caging, fattening, and landing of catches taken before that date are permitted. Unintended catches must be retained, recorded, landed, and counted against quotas. Article 3 determines the entry into force. The Annex specifies the Member State (Spain), the stock (Undulate ray), the zone (Union waters of 8), and the closing date (11 May 2025). There are no direct changes to previous versions, as this regulation is specific to the quota exhaustion for 2025.

The most important provisions for practical use are those concerning the prohibitions and the closing date. Spanish vessels are prohibited from fishing for undulate ray in Union waters of 8 after 11 May 2025. Any catches of undulate ray after this date must be treated as unintended catches and handled according to Article 2(3), meaning they must be recorded and counted against quotas.

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 janvier 2026.#Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Service postal – Compensation pour le service postal universel – Décision de ne pas ouvrir la procédure formelle d’examen – Recours en annulation – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Qualité pour agir – Condition selon laquelle le requérant doit être individuellement concerné par la décision – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Recours introduit par une association professionnelle – Irrecevabilité du recours en annulation.#Affaire C-126/24 P.

This Court decision concerns a challenge by Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte, a business association, against a decision by the European Commission regarding state aid granted by Spain to Correos, the Spanish postal service, for fulfilling its universal service obligations. The Court upholds the lower court’s decision, finding that the association’s appeal is inadmissible because it is not individually concerned by the Commission’s decision. This means the association has not demonstrated that the decision directly and significantly affects its members or its own interests.

The case revolves around whether Uno, as an association, has the right to challenge the Commission’s decision. The Court examines the criteria for admissibility under Article 263(4) TFEU, which allows individuals or entities to challenge EU decisions that directly and individually concern them. The Court analyses whether the Commission correctly decided not to open a formal investigation into the aid, and whether Uno has the standing to bring this action. The Court reviews the arguments presented by Uno, including claims that the Commission imposed an excessive burden of proof, that the decision significantly impacted the competitive position of its members, and that the association’s right to effective judicial protection was violated.

The key takeaway from this decision is that an association challenging a state aid decision must demonstrate a significant impact on the market position of its members or on its own specific interests. The Court emphasizes that merely being an interested party or actively participating in the preliminary investigation is not sufficient to establish admissibility. The decision reinforces the strict criteria for standing in EU law, particularly for non-privileged parties seeking to challenge Commission decisions.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.XH v European Commission.Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.Case C-75/24 P.

This is a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) concerning an appeal by XH against a judgment of the General Court. The case revolves around allegations of psychological harassment made by XH, an official at the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), during periods of sick leave. XH sought annulment of the Commission’s decisions rejecting her request for assistance and opening an invalidity procedure, as well as compensation for damages.

The judgment addresses whether the General Court correctly dismissed XH’s action. It examines the admissibility of challenging the decision to open an invalidity procedure and the merits of the claim regarding the rejection of her request for assistance. The Court of Justice upholds the General Court’s decision, finding no errors of law or distortions of facts and evidence.

The judgment clarifies the criteria for an act to be considered challengeable, emphasizing that it must produce binding legal effects that distinctly change the applicant’s legal position. It also addresses the burden of proof in harassment cases and the scope of the duty of care owed by institutions to their officials. The Court dismisses the appeal, ordering XH to bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others v L.K.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 15(1) – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection – Refusal of a request to access the labour market – Reason for the refusal – Delay in the processing of the application for international protection attributable in part to the applicant.Case C-742/24.

This judgment clarifies the interpretation of Article 15(1) of Directive 2013/33/EU, which concerns access to the labor market for asylum seekers. The Court was asked to clarify what constitutes a delay attributable to the applicant when their asylum application processing is delayed, and how this impacts their right to work. The case specifically addresses situations where delays are caused by a combination of factors, including the applicant’s actions, the Member State’s actions, and external events like a pandemic.

The judgment focuses on the concept of “delay attributable to the applicant” in the context of accessing the labor market. It clarifies that such delay includes not only delays exclusively caused by the applicant but also a portion of delays resulting from a mix of factors (applicant, Member State, external events). The Court states that if an applicant’s lack of cooperation prevents the competent authorities from examining their application for more than nine months, it constitutes a total lack of cooperation, justifying the denial of access to the labor market. However, if the applicant’s failure to cooperate only occurs for part of the nine-month period, the period should be extended by the duration of the delay caused by the applicant.

The Court ruled that Article 15(1) of Directive 2013/33/EU does not prevent a Member State from denying access to the labor market if the delay in processing an asylum application is partly attributable to the applicant. However, the refusal must be based only on the portion of the delay for which the applicant is responsible. This means national authorities must assess the causal link between the applicant’s conduct and the delay, and only consider the time interval related to the applicant’s responsibility when deciding on access to the labor market.

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 janvier 2026.#Issam Anbouba contre Conseil de l’Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives en raison de la situation en Syrie – Liste des personnes auxquelles s’applique le gel de fonds et de ressources économiques – Liste des personnes faisant l’objet de restrictions d’entrée et de passage en transit sur le territoire de l’Union européenne – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste concernée.#Affaire C-494/24 P.

This is a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) regarding an appeal by Mr. Issam Anbouba against a previous judgment of the General Court. The case concerns restrictive measures (sanctions) imposed by the EU against Syria and specifically the listing of Mr. Anbouba as a person subject to these measures.

The structure of the judgment is as follows:

1. **Background:** Mr. Anbouba is challenging the General Court’s decision, which partially rejected his appeal against Council decisions and implementing regulations from 2022 and 2023 that maintained his name on the EU’s sanctions list related to Syria.
2. **Facts:** The judgment summarizes the history of the case, including previous listings of Mr. Anbouba, legal challenges, and modifications to the reasons for his listing. Initially, he was listed for providing economic support to the Syrian regime. Later, the reasons evolved to include providing financial assistance to the repressive apparatus, providing real estate for detention centers, and having financial ties to senior Syrian officials.
3. **General Court Decision:** The General Court annulled the 2022 acts maintaining sanctions against Mr. Anbouba, finding insufficient evidence of his support for the Syrian regime. However, it upheld the 2023 acts, concluding that he met the criteria of an “influential businessman operating in Syria” due to his business activities, co-founding of Cham Holding, and financial relationships with senior Syrian officials.
4. **Appeal:** Mr. Anbouba appeals the General Court’s judgment, arguing that the Tribunal erred in its assessment of the evidence and application of the law.
5. **Court of Justice Analysis:** The Court of Justice examines the admissibility and merits of Mr. Anbouba’s arguments, dividing them into two main grounds:
* Violation of rules on evidence, leading to an error in the application of the law.
* Violation of the principle of adversarial proceedings and rules on evidence.
6. **Court of Justice Decision:** The Court of Justice rejects the appeal, finding that the General Court did not err in its assessment of the evidence or application of the law. It upholds the General Court’s decision to uphold the 2023 sanctions against Mr. Anbouba.

The main provisions of the act that may be the most important for its use:

* The Court of Justice confirms that the criterion of “influential businessman operating in Syria” is a valid basis for imposing sanctions, even without demonstrating a direct link to the Syrian regime.
* The Court reiterates that the General Court has broad discretion in assessing evidence, and its assessment will only be overturned if it misinterprets the rules on the burden of proof or distorts the evidence.
* The Court emphasizes that the review of the validity of a listing must be carried out by examining the evidence as a whole, not in isolation.
* The Court confirms that the mere fact that a judge previously worked for a government ministry does not necessarily raise doubts about their impartiality.

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of undertakings concerned – General principle of the right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of effective judicial protection – Rights of defence of undertakings – Principle of effectiveness.Case C-588/24.

This document is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding a preliminary ruling request concerning competition law. The case revolves around an Italian company, Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl, and the Italian competition authority (AGCM), specifically regarding penalties imposed for an anticompetitive agreement. The core issue is whether national rules allow the AGCM to extend the deadline for concluding an investigation into restrictive agreements, and whether such extensions comply with EU law, particularly concerning the right to good administration and effective judicial protection.

The judgment is structured as follows:
1. **Introduction**: Briefly outlines the request for a preliminary ruling and the parties involved.
2. **Legal Context**: Details relevant EU law (Article 101 TFEU, Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) and Italian law (Law No. 287/90 and Presidential Decree No. 217/98) concerning competition and market protection.
3. **The Dispute in the Main Proceedings and the Question Referred for a Preliminary Ruling**: Describes the factual background, including the AGCM’s investigation into alleged cartels in the corrugated cardboard and packaging markets, the extensions of the investigation, and the penalties imposed on Imballaggi Piemontesi. It also presents the question posed by the Italian court (Consiglio di Stato) regarding the compatibility of Italian rules with EU law.
4. **Consideration of the Question Referred**: Analyzes the question, reformulating it to address the core issues. It discusses the applicability of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the principle of effective judicial protection, and the right to good administration. It also examines the principle of effectiveness in the context of national procedural rules for enforcing EU competition law.
5. **Answer to the Question Referred**: Provides the CJEU’s ruling, stating that Article 101 TFEU does not preclude national legislation allowing the national competition authority to extend the deadline for investigations, provided that such extensions are justified, subject to judicial review, and do not violate the reasonable time requirement.
6. **Costs**: States that the referring court will decide on costs.

The most important provisions of the act are:
* **Article 101 TFEU**: Prohibits agreements that restrict competition within the internal market.
* **Article 41 of the Charter**: Enshrines the right to good administration, including the right to have affairs handled impartially, fairly, and within a reasonable time.
* **Article 47 of the Charter**: Guarantees the right to an effective remedy and a fair trial.

The key takeaway from this judgment is that national competition authorities can extend investigation deadlines in complex cases, but these extensions must be justified, reasonable, and subject to judicial review to ensure fairness and protect the rights of the undertakings involved.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.Coillte Cuideachta Ghníomhaíochta Ainmnithe v Commissioner for Environmental Information.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – Concepts of ‘applicant’ and ‘request’ – Anonymous applicants or applicants using pseudonyms – Right of access to environmental information – Practical arrangements – Obligation for applicants to provide their actual name and a current physical address – Invalidity of the request.Case C-129/24.

This judgment clarifies the interpretation of EU law regarding public access to environmental information, specifically focusing on who qualifies as an “applicant” under Directive 2003/4/EC. The case arose from a dispute in Ireland where a forestry company, Coillte, rejected numerous requests for environmental information because the applicants were either anonymous or used pseudonyms. The core issue is whether individuals must provide their real name and address when requesting environmental information.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that EU law does not require individuals to provide their real name and address when requesting environmental information. However, the judgment also states that national laws can require such identification, provided they adhere to the principles of equivalence and effectiveness. This means that the requirements should not be stricter than those for similar domestic requests and should not make it excessively difficult to exercise the right to access environmental information.

The key takeaway is that while EU law prioritizes broad access to environmental information, it allows Member States some flexibility to implement practical measures to prevent abuse of the system. The judgment balances the right to access information with the need for public authorities to manage requests effectively.

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.bluechip Computer Aktiengesellschaft v Zentralstelle für private Überspielungsrechte (ZPÜ).Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5 – Exceptions and limitations – Fair compensation for private copying – National legislation providing for payment of such compensation by manufacturers, importers and traders of storage media that may be used for making reproductions and are intended for commercial end users – Obligation based on the rebuttable presumption that use of such storage devices is for the purposes of private copying – Whether permissible.Case C-822/24.

This is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning the interpretation of the Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. The case revolves around the question of fair compensation for private copying, specifically when storage media are sold to commercial end users. The CJEU clarifies the conditions under which national legislation can require manufacturers, importers, or traders to pay this compensation.

The judgment addresses a request for a preliminary ruling from the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof). The core issue is whether German law can require manufacturers, importers, or traders of storage media to pay a levy for private copying when these media are sold to commercial end users. The German law presumes that these storage media will be used for private copying, unless the seller can prove otherwise. The CJEU examines this presumption in light of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC, which allows Member States to provide exceptions to the reproduction right for private use, provided that right holders receive fair compensation.

The CJEU rules that Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC does not prevent national laws from requiring manufacturers, importers, and traders of storage media to pay fair compensation even when these media are sold to commercial end users. However, this is conditional: the obligation can be waived if the seller proves that the media are not used by natural persons for private copying or are used only to a minimal extent that causes minimal harm to right holders. The judgment emphasizes that while Member States have broad discretion in determining how to implement fair compensation, they must ensure a balance between the interests of right holders and users. The CJEU also highlights the importance of having an effective system for exemptions or reimbursements for those who can demonstrate that their products are not used for private copying.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.AVR-Afvalverwerking BV v NV BAR-Afvalbeheer and Others.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 12(3) – Public contract awarded directly to a legal person jointly controlled by the contracting authorities – Conditions – Threshold of the activities of the controlled legal person carried out in the performance of tasks entrusted to it by the contracting authorities – Article 12(5) – Consideration of the turnover of the subsidiaries of the group of which the controlled legal person is the parent company – EU accounting legislation – Directive 2013/34/EU – Articles 22 and 24 – Preparation of consolidated financial statements.Case C-692/23.

This judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies how to assess whether a public contract can be directly awarded to a legal person controlled by contracting authorities, without applying standard public procurement procedures. The core issue revolves around determining if the controlled entity performs more than 80% of its activities for the controlling authorities, and how to calculate this percentage when the entity is the parent company of a group. The Court specifies that the turnover of the entire group, including subsidiaries, must be considered, using consolidated financial statements where applicable.

The judgment addresses a request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal, The Hague, Netherlands) concerning the interpretation of Article 12(3)(b) and Article 12(5) of Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement. The case involves a dispute between AVR-Afvalverwerking BV (AVR) and several entities, including NV BAR-Afvalbeheer (BAR) and various municipalities, regarding the direct award of public contracts for waste collection and processing. The referring court sought clarification on whether the 80% activity threshold should be calculated based solely on the turnover of the controlled legal person (AF), or if the turnover of affiliated companies within its group should also be considered.

The Court ruled that when assessing whether a controlled legal person, who is the parent company of a group, meets the requirement that more than 80% of its activities are carried out for the controlling contracting authorities, the turnover of the entire group must be taken into account. This assessment should be based on the consolidated turnover, as required by Articles 22 and 24 of Directive 2013/34/EU on annual financial statements. The Court reasoned that considering the entire group’s turnover is necessary to prevent distortions of competition and to ensure that the controlled entity does not gain an unfair advantage over private economic operators. This interpretation aligns with the objective of preventing circumvention of public procurement rules by artificially separating activities within a group. The Court rejected a request to limit the temporal effects of the judgment, finding no specific evidence to justify such a limitation.

The most important provision of this act is that for the determination of the 80% threshold of activities carried out for controlling authorities, the turnover of the entire group of companies should be taken into account, not just the turnover of the controlled legal person. This ensures a more accurate reflection of the economic reality and prevents potential circumvention of public procurement rules.

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 janvier 2026.#Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Service postal – Compensation pour le service postal universel – Décision de ne pas ouvrir la procédure formelle d’examen – Recours en annulation – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Qualité pour agir – Condition selon laquelle le requérant doit être individuellement concerné par la décision – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Recours introduit par une association professionnelle – Irrecevabilité du recours en annulation.#Affaire C-124/24 P.

This is a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) regarding a case concerning state aid in the postal sector in Spain.

**Essence of the Act:**

The judgment addresses an appeal by Asempre, a professional association of postal service companies, against a decision of the General Court. The General Court had dismissed Asempre’s action for annulment of the European Commission’s decision concerning compensation granted to Correos, the Spanish postal service, for its universal service obligation. The Court of Justice upholds the General Court’s decision, finding that Asempre does not have the standing to bring the action because it is not individually concerned by the Commission’s decision. The Court clarifies the conditions under which an association can challenge state aid decisions and emphasizes that merely being an “interested party” is not sufficient to establish standing.

**Structure and Main Provisions:**

The judgment is structured as follows:

* **Introduction:** Briefly presents the appeal and the contested decision.
* **Background to the Dispute:** Summarizes the facts of the case, including the roles of Asempre, Correos, and the Commission, as well as the relevant Spanish legislation.
* **Proceedings Before the General Court and the Judgment Under Appeal:** Describes the action brought before the General Court and the General Court’s decision to dismiss the action as inadmissible.
* **Forms of Order Sought by the Parties:** Outlines the requests made by Asempre and the responses from the Commission, Spain, and Correos.
* **The Appeal:** Analyzes the three grounds of appeal raised by Asempre:
* Violation of Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) regarding individual concern.
* Violation of the same provision regarding the impact on Asempre’s own interests as an association.
* Violation of the right to effective judicial protection under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
* **Costs:** Determines which party is responsible for covering the costs of the proceedings.

**Main Provisions for Use:**

The most important provisions of the judgment for practical use are those concerning the conditions for standing to bring an action against a Commission decision in the field of state aid:

1. **Individual Concern:** The judgment reiterates that for a party other than the addressee of a decision to have standing, it must be individually concerned by that decision. This means the decision must affect them due to specific attributes or factual circumstances that differentiate them from all other persons.
2. **Interested Party vs. Substantial Impact:** While “interested parties” under Article 108(2) TFEU have the right to bring an action to safeguard their procedural rights, they must demonstrate a “substantial impact” on their market position to challenge the merits of the Commission’s decision.
3. **Role of Associations:** An association can bring an action on behalf of its members if those members would individually have standing. The association must demonstrate that the decision substantially affects the market position of at least one of its members.
4. **Burden of Proof:** The judgment clarifies that the burden of proof on the applicant is to demonstrate a *prima facie* likelihood of a substantial impact on their market position, not to definitively prove actual harm.
5. **Effective Judicial Protection:** The judgment confirms that the right to effective judicial protection does not override the standing requirements of Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU.

Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 15. Januar 2026.#YM gegen Openbaar Ministerie.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen – Rahmenbeschluss 2002/584/JI – Europäischer Haftbefehl zum Zweck der Strafverfolgung – Art. 2 Abs. 4 – Bedingung der beiderseitigen Strafbarkeit – Art. 4 Nr. 1 – Grund, aus dem die Vollstreckung des Europäischen Haftbefehls abgelehnt werden kann – Art. 5 Nr. 3 – Übergabe der betreffenden Person unter der Bedingung einer Garantie der Rücküberstellung in den Vollstreckungsmitgliedstaat, um dort die im Ausstellungsmitgliedstaat verhängte freiheitsentziehende Strafe oder Maßnahme zu verbüßen – Ziele – Resozialisierung – Bekämpfung der Straffreiheit – Rahmenbeschluss 2008/909/JI – Gegenseitige Anerkennung von Strafurteilen für ihre Vollstreckung in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat – Art. 7 Abs. 3 und 4 – Art. 9 Abs. 1 Buchst. d – Auf der fehlenden beiderseitigen Strafbarkeit beruhender Grund für die Versagung der Anerkennung des Urteils und die Nichtvollstreckung der Sanktion – Art. 25 – Vollstreckung von Sanktionen aufgrund eines Europäischen Haftbefehls.#Rechtssache C-641/23.

This is a judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning the interpretation of several provisions of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JAI on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and the Framework Decision 2008/909/JAI on the transfer of prisoners.

The judgment clarifies the relationship between the EAW framework and the framework for the transfer of prisoners, particularly in situations where a person is surrendered on an EAW with a condition that they be returned to the executing state to serve their sentence. It addresses the question of whether the executing state can later refuse to enforce the sentence due to the lack of double criminality (i.e., the offense is not a crime in the executing state).

The CJEU rules that Article 9(1)(d) and Article 25 of Framework Decision 2008/909 preclude national regulations that allow a member state’s authorities to refuse to recognize a judgment and enforce a sentence from another member state based on the lack of double criminality, if the executing judicial authority has already decided to execute the EAW (waiving the double criminality check) and has conditioned the surrender on the person’s return to serve the sentence, unless there has been a change in circumstances after the surrender that would justify not enforcing the return guarantee.

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 janvier 2026.#Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Service postal – Compensation pour le service postal universel – Décision de ne pas ouvrir la procédure formelle d’examen – Recours en annulation – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Qualité pour agir – Condition selon laquelle le requérant doit être individuellement concerné par la décision – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Recours introduit par une association professionnelle – Irrecevabilité du recours en annulation.#Affaire C-124/24 P.

This is a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) regarding a case concerning State aid in the postal sector in Spain.

**Essence of the Act:**

The judgment addresses an appeal by Asempre, a professional association of postal operators, against a decision of the General Court. The General Court had dismissed Asempre’s action for annulment of the Commission’s decision that approved compensation granted to Correos, the Spanish postal service, for its universal service obligation. The Court of Justice upholds the General Court’s decision, finding that Asempre does not have the standing to bring the action because it is not individually concerned by the Commission’s decision. The Court clarifies the conditions under which an association can challenge a Commission decision on State aid.

**Structure and Main Provisions:**

The judgment is structured as follows:

* **Introduction:** Briefly describes the appeal and the judgment being appealed.
* **Background to the Dispute:** Summarizes the facts of the case, including the roles of Asempre, Correos, and the Commission, as well as the relevant legislation and previous decisions.
* **Proceedings Before the General Court and the Judgment Under Appeal:** Outlines the proceedings at the General Court and the reasons for its decision.
* **Forms of Order Sought by the Parties on Appeal:** States the requests made by Asempre and the Commission to the Court of Justice.
* **The Appeal:** This is the core of the judgment, where the Court addresses Asempre’s arguments (grounds of appeal).
* **First Ground of Appeal:** Violation of Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU (Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), arguing that the General Court wrongly concluded that Asempre was not individually concerned by the contested decision.
* **Second Ground of Appeal:** Violation of Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU, arguing that the General Court wrongly concluded that Asempre had not demonstrated that its own interests as an association were affected.
* **Third Ground of Appeal:** Violation of the right to effective judicial protection (Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights), arguing that the General Court applied Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU, in an “arbitrary” manner.
* **Costs:** Determines which party is responsible for covering the costs of the proceedings.

**Main Provisions for Use:**

The most important provisions for understanding and using this judgment are:

* **Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU:** This article defines who has the right to bring an action for annulment before the EU courts. The judgment clarifies the interpretation of “individually concerned” in the context of State aid decisions and associations.
* **Article 108 TFEU:** This article governs the procedure for reviewing State aid. The judgment distinguishes between challenging the procedure followed by the Commission and challenging the substance of the Commission’s decision.
* **Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union:** This article guarantees the right to effective judicial protection. The judgment clarifies that this right does not override the standing requirements of Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU.

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.Case C-45/24.

This judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerns the interpretation of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, specifically Article 8(1)(a), which deals with passenger rights in the event of flight cancellation. The central issue is whether the reimbursement of a ticket’s cost should include the commission charged by an intermediary (like a travel agency) when the ticket was purchased. The court clarifies the conditions under which this commission should be included in the reimbursement, particularly when the airline does not know the exact amount of the commission.

The judgment addresses a request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of Austria in a case between an Austrian consumer association and KLM (Royal Dutch Airlines). The case arose after passengers who had their flights cancelled were reimbursed for the ticket price but not for the commission they paid to the Opodo travel agency. The Austrian court sought clarification on whether the reimbursement should include this commission and who bears the burden of proving the airline’s awareness of the commission.

The Court of Justice ruled that the reimbursement should include the commission charged by the intermediary, even if the airline does not know the exact amount. The Court reasoned that the commission is an unavoidable part of the ticket price when purchased through an intermediary. The Court also stated that it is not necessary for the air carrier to know the exact amount of the agency commission in order for the air passenger whose flight has been cancelled to be able to obtain reimbursement of that commission.

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2026.Ambito territoriale di caccia Ancona 2 v Azienda Agricola Camarzano di RK.Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agricultural sector – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 – De minimis aid – Monitoring – Member State providing for the grant and the payment of de minimis aid without requiring a specific declaration from the applicant undertaking as to the amount and nature of any other State aid received during a period of three fiscal years – Production of self-certification relating to such aid.Case C-615/24.

This is a judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the interpretation of Regulation No. 1408/2013 on de minimis aid in the agricultural sector. The case revolves around a dispute in Italy concerning compensation for damage caused by wild fauna to agricultural crops. The core issue is whether an agricultural undertaking applying for de minimis aid must provide a declaration about other aid received in the past three years, and when this declaration should be submitted.

The judgment clarifies the conditions under which Member States can grant de minimis aid to agricultural undertakings. It focuses on the interpretation of Article 3 and Article 6(1) and (3) of Regulation No 1408/2013, particularly regarding the requirement for a declaration from the undertaking about other de minimis aid received. The Court specifies that national legislation cannot allow the grant of agricultural de minimis aid without requiring a declaration from the applicant about other state aid received during the current and previous two fiscal years, especially before a central aid register is fully established.

The Court rules that while the declaration about previously received aid is not an eligibility condition for submitting the aid application, it is a mandatory condition for granting the aid. This means the Member State must obtain this declaration before disbursing the aid. The judgment emphasizes that the declaration is essential for monitoring compliance with de minimis aid limits and ensuring that the aid falls within the scope of the regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 214/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/27]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex IX to the EEA Agreement to incorporate several Commission Delegated Regulations related to the regulation of crypto-assets. These regulations supplement Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and cover various aspects, including cooperation between authorities, handling of complaints, estimation of transaction volumes, continuity of crypto-asset services, and notification requirements for financial entities. The incorporation of these regulations extends the application of the EU’s crypto-asset regulatory framework to the EEA countries.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 incorporates six Commission Delegated Regulations into Annex IX of the EEA Agreement by adding new points (31rf to 31rm) after point 31re. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated Delegated Regulations will be authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date of the Decision, contingent upon the completion of notifications required under the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The main provisions of the act are the incorporation of the following Commission Delegated Regulations:
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/292:** Establishes a template for cooperation arrangements between competent authorities and supervisory authorities of third countries regarding crypto-assets.
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/293:** Specifies requirements, templates, and procedures for handling complaints related to asset-referenced tokens.
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/294:** Specifies requirements, templates, and procedures for handling complaints by crypto-asset service providers.
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/298:** Specifies the methodology for estimating the number and value of transactions associated with asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens not denominated in an official currency of a Member State.
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/299:** Sets out regulatory technical standards on continuity and regularity in the performance of crypto-asset services.
* **Regulation (EU) 2025/303:** Specifies the information to be included by certain financial entities in the notification of their intention to provide crypto-asset services.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 194/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2026/10]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement to incorporate Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1834 regarding ecodesign requirements for fans driven by motors with an electric input power between 125 W and 500 kW. It also repeals Commission Regulation (EU) No 327/2011, which is being replaced, with effect from 24 July 2037.

The Decision is structured into five articles. Article 1 amends Chapter IV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by inserting Regulation (EU) 2024/1834 and deleting Regulation (EU) No 327/2011 with effect from 24 July 2037. Article 2 makes similar amendments to Annex IV of the EEA Agreement. Article 3 ensures that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Regulation (EU) 2024/1834 are authentic. Article 4 specifies the entry into force date, and Article 5 mandates publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The main change is the incorporation of the new ecodesign requirements for fans and the repeal of the older regulation.

The most important provision is the incorporation of Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1834 into the EEA Agreement, which updates the ecodesign requirements for fans driven by motors within the specified power range. This means that manufacturers and suppliers within the EEA must comply with the new standards set out in Regulation (EU) 2024/1834. The continued application of Annexes I, II and III to Regulation (EU) No 327/2011 until 24 July 2037, in relation to fans integrated into other products and in relation to spare part fans, is also important.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 199/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/14]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Regulation (EU) 2024/2838 into the EEA Agreement, specifically addressing technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification. The Decision ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the updated EU regulations concerning reporting requirements in Regulations (EU) No 1379/2013, (EU) No 167/2013, and (EU) No 168/2013.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds an indent to points 40 and 46 of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, referencing Regulation (EU) 2024/2838. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Regulation (EU) 2024/2838 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the Decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Regulation (EU) 2024/2838 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the changes to reporting requirements outlined in Regulation (EU) 2024/2838 now also apply within the European Economic Area, ensuring consistency across the EU and EEA member states.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 207/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/26]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1112, which updates the Union list of flavourings by including Naringenin and 2-methyl-1-(2-(5-(p-tolyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)piperidin-1-yl)butan-1-one. The Decision specifies that it does not apply to Liechtenstein under certain conditions related to the trade agreement between the EU and Switzerland. The Decision provides for the entry into force and publication details.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/1112 within point 54zzzzs of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, which concerns Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 on flavourings. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Regulation (EU) 2025/1112 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the date of entry into force, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the EU Regulation on flavourings into the EEA Agreement, thereby extending its application to the EEA countries (excluding Liechtenstein under specific conditions). This ensures harmonized standards for flavourings within the EEA, impacting food producers and consumers.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 217/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2026/44]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning transport regulations. The Decision incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144 into the EEA Agreement, which relates to the list of air carriers banned from operating or subject to operational restrictions within the Union. This ensures that the EEA Agreement aligns with EU regulations regarding air carrier safety and operational standards. The Decision also provides for the authentic texts of the Implementing Regulation in Icelandic and Norwegian languages.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds an indent to point 66zab of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement, referencing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144 will be authentic. Article 3 states the date of entry into force of the Decision, contingent upon completion of notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1144 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the updated list of air carriers banned or restricted within the EU now also applies within the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 201/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/19]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex II to the EEA Agreement to incorporate Regulation (EU) 2024/1257, also known as the Euro 7 regulation, concerning the type-approval of motor vehicles regarding emissions and battery durability. It also addresses the repeal of several older regulations that are being replaced by Regulation (EU) 2024/1257.

The Decision modifies Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by inserting a reference to Regulation (EU) 2024/1257. It includes adaptations for the application of the Regulation within the EEA, specifically concerning the roles of the Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority in cases where type-approval is granted in an EFTA State. Furthermore, it adds a reference to Regulation (EU) 2024/1257 within the existing point related to Regulation (EU) 2018/858. Finally, it stipulates the deletion of references to the older regulations being repealed by Regulation (EU) 2024/1257, with effect from 1 July 2030 and 1 July 2031, depending on the specific regulation.

The most important provision is the incorporation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1257 into the EEA Agreement, ensuring that the latest standards for vehicle emissions and battery durability apply across the European Economic Area. The adaptations concerning the EFTA Surveillance Authority are also important, as they clarify the roles and responsibilities of different bodies within the EEA framework. The repeal dates for the older regulations are crucial for understanding the timeline for the transition to the new Euro 7 standards.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 192/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/11]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2904, which concerns the publication of references for European Assessment Documents related to specific construction products, namely internal doorsets made of metal profiles and bound polystyrene, lacking fire resistance and smoke control characteristics. This ensures that the updated EU regulations on technical standards for these products are also applicable within the European Economic Area.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2904 within Chapter XXI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically under the point addressing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2904 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are considered authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the EU’s updated standards for internal doorsets into the EEA Agreement. This means that manufacturers and distributors of these specific construction products within the EEA must adhere to the referenced European Assessment Documents.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 215/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2026/45]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XI to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/650 into the EEA Agreement, updating harmonised technical conditions for short-range devices within specific frequency bands. This ensures the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU regulations in electronic communication, audiovisual services, and information society.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/650 within point 5czq of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/650, published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon completion of notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/650 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the updated technical conditions for short-range devices in the 874-876 and 915-921 MHz frequency bands, as specified in the incorporated decision, now apply within the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 191/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2026/12]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex I to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning veterinary and phytosanitary matters. The Decision incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/757 regarding the authorization of sepiolite as a feed additive for all animal species into the EEA Agreement. This ensures the same standards for feedingstuffs apply within the European Economic Area. The Decision does not apply to Liechtenstein due to its specific agreement with the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products.

The structure of the act is straightforward: it includes recitals explaining the need for the amendment, followed by articles that detail the specific changes to Annex I of the EEA Agreement. Article 1 introduces a new point referencing Regulation (EU) 2025/757. Article 2 mandates the publication of the text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/757 in Icelandic and Norwegian languages in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal. Articles 3 and 4 define the entry into force and publication details of the Decision.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/757 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the authorization of sepiolite as a feed additive, as defined in the EU regulation, now also applies within the EEA, harmonizing standards for animal feed across the participating countries.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 186/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) and Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/31]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) and Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement. The Decision incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/637 into the EEA Agreement, updating the requirements for the entry into the Union of specific products such as dairy, food additives derived from animals, collagen casings, minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat, and composite products containing gelatine capsules. The Decision ensures that EEA member states align with the EU’s updated regulations in these areas.

The Decision is structured in five articles. Articles 1, 2 and 3 specify the amendments to Annex I and II of the EEA Agreement by adding references to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/637. Article 3 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/637 will be published and authentic. Articles 4 and 5 define the entry into force and publication details of the Decision. This Decision updates the EEA Agreement to reflect the latest EU regulations on veterinary and phytosanitary matters, as well as technical standards for specific food products.

The most important provision is the incorporation of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/637 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the EEA countries must now adhere to the updated requirements for the import of dairy products, certain food additives derived from animals, collagen casings, minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat, and composite products containing gelatine capsules.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 213/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/16]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex IX to the EEA Agreement to incorporate five recent Commission Regulations related to the regulation of crypto-assets. These regulations specify criteria for classifying asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, detail intervention powers for authorities, establish standards for cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities, define reporting requirements for certain tokens, and set out formats for crypto-asset white papers. The overall aim is to integrate these EU financial services regulations into the EEA Agreement, ensuring consistent regulation of crypto-assets across the European Economic Area.

The Decision modifies Annex IX of the EEA Agreement by adding points 31ra to 31re after point 31r. These new points incorporate the following regulations: Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024/1506 and 2024/1507, and Commission Implementing Regulations (EU) 2024/2545, 2024/2902, and 2024/2984. The Decision also includes specific adaptations for Delegated Regulations (EU) 2024/1506 and 2024/1507, specifying the role of the EFTA Surveillance Authority alongside the EBA and ESMA. Furthermore, the Decision stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulations will be authentic.

The most important provisions for practical use are those that directly affect the obligations of entities dealing with crypto-assets. These include the criteria for classifying tokens as significant (Regulation 2024/1506), the factors considered for intervention powers (Regulation 2024/1507), the standards for reporting (Regulation 2024/2902), and the formats for white papers (Regulation 2024/2984). Businesses and regulatory bodies in the EEA need to be aware of these standards to ensure compliance and effective oversight of the crypto-asset market.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 205/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/38]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification related to foodstuffs. The decision incorporates two Commission Regulations (EU) 2025/651 and 2025/652 into the EEA Agreement. These regulations amend existing regulations regarding the use of certain food additives, such as mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, carnauba wax, lecithins, fatty acids, and Steviol glycosides. The Decision updates the list of incorporated EU acts in the relevant annex to the EEA Agreement.

The structure of the act is straightforward. It consists of a preamble outlining the reasons for the decision, followed by four articles. Article 1 amends Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding references to Regulations (EU) 2025/651 and (EU) 2025/652. Article 2 states that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulations are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, and Article 4 mandates the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision adds new regulations to the EEA Agreement, ensuring that the EEA EFTA States (excluding Liechtenstein under specific conditions) align with the EU’s updated regulations on food additives.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the two Commission Regulations into the EEA Agreement. This means that businesses and individuals within the EEA (excluding Liechtenstein under specific conditions) must comply with the updated rules regarding the use of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, carnauba wax, lecithins, fatty acids, and Steviol glycosides in food products.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 225/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement, on rules of origin [2026/41]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning rules of origin. The key purpose of this decision is to remove Appendix A from Protocol 4, which contained an alternative set of rules of origin. This amendment is a consequence of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (PEM Convention) and its incorporation into the EEA Agreement.

The Decision is structured simply, containing three articles. Article 1 is the core of the decision, deleting Appendix A from Protocol 4 of the EEA Agreement. Article 2 specifies the date of entry into force, which is 20 September 2025, contingent upon the completion of notifications required under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 3 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which effectively repeals the alternative set of rules of origin previously included in Appendix A to Protocol 4. This change aligns the EEA Agreement with the PEM Convention, streamlining the rules of origin applicable within the pan-Euro-Mediterranean region.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 219/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2026/42]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning environmental regulations. The decision incorporates Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2252, which amends Decision 94/741/EC regarding questionnaires for Member States’ reports on the implementation of certain Directives in the waste sector, into the EEA Agreement.

The act consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2252 within point 1ca of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, which deals with Commission Decision 94/741/EC. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2252 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the EU’s updated reporting requirements in the waste sector into the EEA Agreement. This ensures that EEA member states align with the EU’s standards for monitoring and reporting on waste management, promoting consistency and comparability in environmental data across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 200/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/29]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/258 into the EEA Agreement, ensuring that the rules for determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption for medium and heavy lorries and buses, including those running on hydrogen and other new technologies, are uniformly applied across the European Economic Area. The Decision also updates the references to relevant regulations within Annex II.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 updates points 45zzl and 45zzw of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding a reference to Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/258. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Regulation (EU) 2025/258, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Regulation (EU) 2025/258 into the EEA Agreement. This ensures that the updated standards for determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy vehicles, including those using new technologies like hydrogen, are uniformly applied across the EEA, promoting environmental standards and fair competition.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 208/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement [2026/39]

This is Decision No 208/2025 of the EEA Joint Committee, which amends Annex VI to the EEA Agreement concerning social security. The Decision incorporates Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems Decision No E8 into the EEA Agreement and repeals Decision No E2, which was previously incorporated. Decision No E8 establishes a change management procedure for details of bodies defined in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, which are listed in the electronic directory of EESSI (Electronic Exchange of Social Security Information).

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 amends Annex VI to the EEA Agreement by inserting point 3.E8 regarding Decision No E8 and deleting point 3.E2 regarding the repealed Decision No E2. Article 2 states that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Decision No E8 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, and Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section and EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is the incorporation of Decision No E8, which introduces a new change management procedure for the electronic directory of social security bodies within the EESSI system. This ensures that information about these bodies is kept up-to-date and accurate, facilitating cross-border social security coordination within the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 196/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/3]

The Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 196/2025 amends Annex II to the EEA Agreement to incorporate several Commission Implementing Regulations concerning active substances used in plant protection products. Specifically, it addresses the deletion of certain substances from the list of candidates for substitution and the renewal or approval of others. The decision ensures that EEA member states align with the EU’s updated regulations in this area.

The act is structured into four articles. Article 1 amends Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding indents related to Commission Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/833 and 2025/845 in point 13a, adding indents related to Commission Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/808 and 2025/833 in point 13zzzzt, and inserting points 13zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzi and 13zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzj after point 13zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzh. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language texts of Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/808, (EU) 2025/833, and (EU) 2025/845 will be authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision of this act is Article 1, which updates Annex II of the EEA Agreement to reflect changes in EU regulations regarding active substances. This ensures that the EEA countries adhere to the same standards as the EU in the regulation of plant protection products. The inclusion of Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/808, 2025/833, and 2025/845 specifically addresses the deletion of gamma-cyhalothrin, ipconazole, and oxamyl, the renewal of lenacil, and the approval of elemental iron, respectively.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 224/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2026/40]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning statistics. The amendment incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3159 into the EEA Agreement. This regulation concerns harmonized indices of consumer prices and the house price index, particularly regarding the classification of consumption and the inclusion of games of chance.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3159 within the existing point 19b of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement, which deals with Regulation (EU) 2016/792. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3159 will be authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3159 into the EEA Agreement, thereby extending the application of the EU regulation on harmonized indices of consumer prices and the house price index to the EEA countries. This ensures that the classification of consumption and the inclusion of games of chance are harmonized within the EEA for statistical purposes.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 223/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2026/15]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/668 into the EEA Agreement, which specifies variables related to digital platform employment within the labor force domain for a 2026 ad hoc subject. This ensures that statistical data collection and reporting on digital platform employment are harmonized across the EEA.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 inserts a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/668 into Annex XXI of the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the Delegated Regulation are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date of the Decision, contingent upon notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union and its EEA Supplement.

The most important provision is Article 1, which effectively extends the application of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/668 to the EEA countries. This means that EEA member states are now obligated to collect and report data on digital platform employment according to the variables specified in the incorporated regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 209/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/23]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning financial services. The Decision incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/855 into the EEA Agreement, updating the rules for calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options related to commodity risk. This ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU regulations in financial risk management.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/855 within point 14azy of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, which already references Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/931. Article 2 mandates the publication of the text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/855 in Icelandic and Norwegian in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, confirming its authenticity in those languages. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by the EEA Agreement. Article 4 directs the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the new Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/855 into the EEA Agreement. This means that entities within the European Economic Area will now be subject to the updated standards for calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options mapped to the commodity risk category, as specified in the incorporated regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 193/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/8]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification for marine equipment. The Decision updates the incorporated EU legislation by replacing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1975 with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1533, which lays down rules for the application of Directive 2014/90/EU regarding design, construction, performance, and testing standards for marine equipment. This ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the most current EU standards in this sector.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 replaces the reference to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1975 with a reference to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1533 in Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the authentic texts of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1533 in Icelandic and Norwegian languages will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 3 states the Decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union. The main change is the replacement of the older regulation with the newer one, ensuring alignment with the latest EU standards for marine equipment.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the new EU regulation (2025/1533) into the EEA Agreement, making it applicable within the EEA. This means that manufacturers and suppliers of marine equipment within the EEA must comply with the design, construction, performance, and testing standards outlined in Regulation 2025/1533.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 211/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/24]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning financial services. The core purpose is to incorporate Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/19 into the EEA Agreement. This regulation updates the taxonomy for the single electronic reporting format.

The Decision is structured simply, with four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/19 within point 29dd of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulation will be authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon EEA Agreement notifications. Article 4 mandates publication in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/19 into the EEA Agreement, making the updated taxonomy for the single electronic reporting format applicable within the EEA. This ensures consistent financial reporting standards across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 195/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/4]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification. The Decision incorporates several Commission Implementing Regulations related to the approval and extension of approval periods for various active substances and basic substances used in plant protection products. These substances range from grape seed extract to microorganisms like Bacillus strains and viruses like Betabaculovirus phoperculellae, as well as chemical substances like mepiquat chloride.

The Decision is structured into four articles. Article 1 amends Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding indents and points that list the incorporated Commission Implementing Regulations. Article 2 ensures that the texts of the listed Implementing Regulations in Icelandic and Norwegian languages are authentic. Article 3 specifies the date of entry into force of the Decision, contingent upon notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union. The main change is the inclusion of new regulations concerning specific substances used in plant protection, ensuring that the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU decisions in this area.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly amends Annex II of the EEA Agreement by incorporating the listed Commission Implementing Regulations. This inclusion ensures that the regulations concerning the approval and use of specific active and basic substances in plant protection products are uniformly applied across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 189/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2026/9]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex I to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning veterinary and phytosanitary matters. It incorporates several Commission Implementing Regulations related to feed additives for animals into the EEA Agreement. Additionally, it repeals outdated regulations that have been replaced by newer ones. The decision ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU legislation on animal feed.

The Decision is structured into four articles. Article 1 details the amendments to Chapter II of Annex I to the EEA Agreement, adding and modifying references to specific Commission Implementing Regulations. These regulations concern the authorisation, renewal, and amendment of various feed additives. Article 2 stipulates that the texts of the incorporated Implementing Regulations in Icelandic and Norwegian languages will be authentic. Article 3 sets the entry into force date, and Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provisions of this act are those that incorporate new Commission Implementing Regulations into the EEA Agreement. These include regulations concerning the authorisation of substances like geranium rose essential oil, L-arginine, indigo carmine, sodium ferrocyanide, and L-valine as feed additives. Also important are the provisions that update references to existing regulations, such as Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/913, and repeal outdated regulations like Regulation (EC) No 1810/2005. These changes ensure that the EEA Agreement aligns with current EU standards for animal feed, which is crucial for businesses and individuals involved in the agricultural sector within the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 206/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/37]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/666 into the EEA Agreement, which concerns the use of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, cellulose gum (E 466) and specifications for cellulose (E 460), methyl cellulose (E 461), ethyl cellulose (E 462), hydroxypropyl cellulose (E 463), hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (E 464), ethyl methyl cellulose (E 465), sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, cellulose gum (E 466), cross-linked sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, cross linked cellulose gum (E 468) and enzymatically hydrolysed carboxy methyl cellulose (E 469). The Decision updates the list of EU legislation related to technical regulations, standards, testing and certification that are applicable within the European Economic Area. It does not apply to Liechtenstein under specific conditions related to the trade agreement between the EU and Switzerland.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 incorporates Regulation (EU) 2025/666 by adding a reference to it in Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically in points related to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. Article 2 states that the text of Regulation (EU) 2025/666 in Icelandic and Norwegian languages will be authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required under the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/666 into the EEA Agreement, extending the rules regarding the use and specifications of certain food additives to the EEA countries. This ensures harmonized standards for these substances across the EU and EEA, affecting food producers and consumers in those regions.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 184/2025 of 27 August 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/30]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning financial services. The Decision incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1184 into the EEA Agreement, updating the list of high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regimes. This update involves adding some countries to the list and removing others.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1184 within point 23bb of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the Delegated Regulation are authentic. Article 3 states the Decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon EEA Agreement Article 103(1) notifications. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1184 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the changes to the list of high-risk third countries, as defined in the Delegated Regulation, now apply within the EEA, impacting financial institutions and other entities subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations within the EEA member states.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 212/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/18]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning financial services regulations related to over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. The core purpose is to extend the deferred application date for certain clearing obligations and risk management procedures for OTC derivative contracts. This extension applies to intragroup transactions where one counterparty is in an EFTA State and the other is in a third country, ensuring these transactions remain exempt from specific requirements until Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 is incorporated into the EEA Agreement. The decision aims to prevent these transactions from being prematurely subjected to clearing obligations and margin requirements.

The Decision modifies Annex IX of the EEA Agreement by amending specific points related to Commission Delegated Regulations (EU) 2015/2205, 2016/592, 2016/1178, and 2016/2251. It replaces the fixed date of “30 June 2025” with a variable date tied to the entry into force of the EEA Joint Committee’s decision incorporating Regulation (EU) 2024/2987. This ensures alignment with the updated regulatory framework introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/2987, which modifies the equivalence decision process for third-country central counterparties.

The most important provision of this decision is the extension of the deferred application date for the clearing obligation and margin requirements for specific intragroup OTC derivative contracts. Instead of expiring on June 30, 2025, the exemption will now last until the incorporation of Regulation (EU) 2024/2987 into the EEA Agreement. This change is crucial for entities engaged in cross-border intragroup OTC derivative transactions between EFTA States and third countries, as it provides continued relief from certain regulatory obligations.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 197/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/7]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement to incorporate Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1973. The regulation establishes a list of antimicrobials that are either prohibited or restricted in their use, according to Articles 112 and 113 of Regulation (EU) 2019/6. The Decision ensures that this regulation applies within the European Economic Area. The Decision also provides for the authentic texts of the Implementing Regulation in Icelandic and Norwegian languages.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 incorporates Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1973 into Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1973 are authentic. Article 3 defines the entry into force date of the Decision, and Article 4 concerns its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision adds a new point to Annex II of the EEA Agreement, specifically referencing and incorporating Regulation (EU) 2024/1973. There are no direct changes to existing provisions, but rather an addition of a new regulation to the list of incorporated acts.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1973 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the restrictions and prohibitions on the use of certain antimicrobials, as detailed in Regulation (EU) 2024/1973, now apply within the EEA, impacting how these substances can be used in veterinary medicine within the EEA member states.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 203/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/28]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification related to foodstuffs. The Decision incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2794 into the EEA Agreement, updating the list of recognized control bodies authorized to conduct controls and issue organic certificates in third countries for the purpose of importing organic products into the Union. The Decision clarifies that it does not apply to Liechtenstein under specific conditions related to the trade agreement between the European Community and Switzerland.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 amends point 54bh of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2794 to the list of incorporated regulations. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2794 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2794 into the EEA Agreement. This inclusion ensures that the updated list of recognized control bodies for organic products is legally binding within the EEA, affecting businesses involved in the import of organic products from third countries into the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 210/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2026/22]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex IX to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/212, which corrects Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2055 regarding regulatory technical standards for cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities concerning the right of establishment and freedom to provide services for payment institutions. The Decision ensures the updated regulations apply within the European Economic Area.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/212 in point 16ea of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement, which concerns Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2055. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/212, published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the amending regulation into the EEA Agreement, ensuring that the updated standards for financial services and payment institutions are applicable within the EEA. This inclusion ensures consistent regulatory oversight and cooperation across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 206/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/37]

The Decision is structured with a preamble outlining the legal basis and the need for the amendment, followed by four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/666 in Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 states that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Regulation (EU) 2025/666 are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, and Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision does not apply to Liechtenstein.

The most important provision is Article 1, which effectively extends the application of Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/666 to the EEA member states (excluding Liechtenstein). This means that the rules and standards set out in Regulation (EU) 2025/666 regarding the specified food additives will now also be legally binding in the EEA.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 202/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/36]

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 187/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) and Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/33]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) and Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2598, which establishes a list of third countries or regions authorized to export certain animals and animal products intended for human consumption into the Union. This regulation ensures compliance with the prohibition on the use of certain antimicrobial medicinal products, as per Regulation (EU) 2017/625. The decision specifies that the act shall apply to Iceland for the areas referred to in paragraph 2 of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement.

The Decision is structured into five articles. Articles 1 and 2 amend Annex I and Annex II of the EEA Agreement, respectively, by incorporating Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2598. Article 3 mandates the publication of the text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2598 in Icelandic and Norwegian languages in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union. Article 4 defines the entry into force date, and Article 5 concerns the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is the incorporation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2598 into the EEA Agreement. This regulation directly impacts which third countries are authorized to export certain animals and animal products into the EEA, based on their compliance with EU standards regarding the use of antimicrobial medicinal products.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 198/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/6]

This Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amends Annex II to the EEA Agreement to incorporate Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/117 regarding joint scientific consultations on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices. This incorporation ensures the same rules apply within the European Economic Area. The decision updates both Chapter XIII and Chapter XXX of Annex II by adding references to Regulation (EU) 2025/117. The decision also establishes the authentic status of the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulation.

The Decision consists of 4 articles. Article 1 amends Annex II to the EEA Agreement by inserting references to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/117 in Chapter XIII and Chapter XXX. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/117, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the EEA Section and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/117 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the rules and procedures outlined in Regulation (EU) 2025/117 now apply to the EEA countries, specifically concerning joint scientific consultations for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 185/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2026/32]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex I to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning veterinary and phytosanitary matters. The Decision incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/687 into the EEA Agreement. This regulation relates to inspections of slaughterhouses, both before and after slaughter, and inspections at the place of origin of the animals. The Decision updates the list of EU legislation incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/687 in Annex I to the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the Regulation are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date, contingent upon EEA Agreement notification procedures. Article 4 mandates publication in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/687 into the EEA Agreement, thereby extending the application of the EU regulation on ante- and post-mortem inspections to the EEA countries (excluding Liechtenstein).

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 220/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2026/20]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement. The decision incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1253 into the EEA Agreement, which concerns the functioning of the Union Registry under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS). This ensures that the rules for the ETS, particularly regarding the registration of allowances for EFTA States and their operators, are consistent across the EEA.

The Decision modifies point 21anb of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, which relates to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1122. It adds Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1253 to the list of relevant regulations. It replaces the text of adaptation (a) to clarify that the issue, transfer, and cancellation of allowances concerning EFTA States and their operators will be registered in the Union Registry, with the Central Administrator having the competence to perform tasks related to these operations. Finally, it inserts a new adaptation (da) to include the EFTA Court alongside the Court of Justice of the European Union in Article 58a(1).

The most important provision is the inclusion of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1253 into the EEA Agreement, ensuring that EFTA states are integrated into the Union Registry for emissions allowances. The adaptation regarding the jurisdiction of the EFTA Court is also significant, as it clarifies the legal avenues available within the EEA framework.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 216/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2026/25]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement. The Decision incorporates Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2025/811 into the EEA Agreement. This directive concerns amendments to Annex I of Directive 2002/59/EC regarding information to be notified to ship reporting systems.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a reference to Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2025/811 in point 55a of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement, which concerns Directive 2002/59/EC on ship reporting systems. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Delegated Directive (EU) 2025/811, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal, are authentic. Article 3 states the entry into force date of the Decision, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which effectively extends the application of Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2025/811 to the EEA countries by incorporating it into the EEA Agreement. This ensures that the updated requirements for information to be notified to ship reporting systems are also applicable within the EEA, promoting harmonized maritime safety and efficiency standards across the European Economic Area.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 222/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2026/17]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XX to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning environmental regulations. The decision incorporates Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/322 into the EEA Agreement, updating the list of ship recycling facilities. This ensures that the EEA Agreement reflects the latest EU legislation on ship recycling.

The act consists of four articles. Article 1 incorporates Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/322 into Annex XX of the EEA Agreement by adding a new indent to point 32fhd. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/322 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the decision in the EEA Section and the EEA Supplement of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision of this act is Article 1, which directly amends Annex XX of the EEA Agreement by including the updated list of ship recycling facilities as defined in Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/322. This inclusion ensures that ship recycling facilities within the EEA adhere to the standards set by the EU regulation.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 204/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/35]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing and certification related to foodstuffs. The Decision incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/352 regarding the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3121 concerning the recognition of control bodies for organic products imported into the Union. The amendment ensures that these EU regulations also apply within the European Economic Area. Liechtenstein is excluded from the application of this Decision due to its specific agreement with the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 amends Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding references to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3121 and Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/352. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulations are authentic. Article 3 states the entry into force date of the Decision, and Article 4 concerns its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the two EU regulations into the EEA Agreement. This means that businesses and individuals within the EEA must comply with the requirements set out in Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/352 regarding the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3121 concerning the recognition of control bodies for organic products imported into the Union.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 221/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2026/21]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XX to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723 into the EEA Agreement, which concerns detailed rules for calculating price differences between eligible aviation fuels and fossil kerosene, and for the EU ETS allocation of allowances for the use of eligible aviation fuels. The Decision ensures the application of these rules within the European Economic Area.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 adds a new point to Annex XX of the EEA Agreement, specifically referencing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the Delegated Regulation are authentic. Article 3 specifies the entry into force date of the Decision, contingent upon the completion of notifications required by the EEA Agreement. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723 into the EEA Agreement. This means that the rules outlined in the Delegated Regulation regarding the calculation of price differences for aviation fuels and the allocation of EU ETS allowances will now also apply within the EEA, impacting aviation fuel suppliers and operators within the EEA countries.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 204/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2026/35]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex II to the EEA Agreement, specifically concerning technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification related to foodstuffs. The Decision incorporates Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/352 regarding the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3121 concerning the recognition of control bodies for organic products imported into the Union. The amendment ensures that these EU regulations are also applicable within the European Economic Area. Liechtenstein is excluded from the application of this Decision due to its specific agreement with the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products.

The Decision is structured with a preamble outlining the legal basis and purpose, followed by four articles. Article 1 amends Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement by adding references to the two EU regulations. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of the incorporated regulations are authentic. Article 3 defines the entry into force date, and Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which directly incorporates the two EU regulations into the EEA Agreement. This means that businesses and individuals within the EEA must comply with the requirements of Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/352 regarding the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3121 concerning the recognition of control bodies for organic products imported into the Union.

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 221/2025 of 19 September 2025 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2026/21]

This is a Decision of the EEA Joint Committee amending Annex XX to the EEA Agreement. The amendment incorporates Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723 into the EEA Agreement, which concerns detailed rules for calculating price differences between eligible aviation fuels and fossil kerosene, and the EU ETS allocation of allowances for the use of eligible aviation fuels. The decision ensures that the provisions of the specified EU regulation also apply within the European Economic Area.

The Decision consists of four articles. Article 1 introduces the new regulation into Annex XX of the EEA Agreement. Article 2 stipulates that the Icelandic and Norwegian language versions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723 will be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal and are authentic. Article 3 states the decision’s entry into force date, contingent upon EEA Agreement Article 103(1) notifications. Article 4 mandates the publication of the Decision in the relevant sections of the Official Journal of the European Union.

The most important provision is Article 1, which effectively extends the application of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/723 to the EEA countries. This means that businesses and entities within the EEA involved in aviation fuels and the EU ETS must comply with the rules outlined in the incorporated regulation regarding the calculation of price differences and allocation of allowances.

Січень 2026
Пн	Вт	Ср	Чт	Пт	Сб	Нд
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Review of the EU legislation for 16/01/2026

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/117

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/50

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/103

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/104

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/114

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/96

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/101

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/93

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/98

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/119

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/95

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/94

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/102

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/124

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/51

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/90

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/89

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/120

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/85

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/92

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/91

UN Regulation No. 80

Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/112

Court Decision: Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission

Court Decision: XH v European Commission

Court Decision: Asylum Seekers – Access to Labor Market

Court Decision: Restrictive Measures (Sanctions) Against Syria

Court Decision: Italian Company, Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl and the Italian competition authority (AGCM)

Court Decision:Public Access to Environmental Information

Court Decision: Fair Compensation for Private Copying

Court Decision: Public Contract Can be Directly Awarded to a Legal Person

Court Decision: State Aid in the Postal Sector in Spain

Court Decision: European Arrest Warrant

Court Decision: State Aid in the Postal Sector in Spain

Court Decision: Flight Cancellation

Court Decision:De Minimis Aid in the Agricultural Sector

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Crypto-Assets

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Fans Driven By Motors

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Technical Regulations, Standards, Testing

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Food Flavourings

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : List of Air Carriers Banned

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Vehicle Emissions and Battery Durability

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Publication of References for Construction Products

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Short-Range Devices

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Veterinary and Phytosanitary Matters

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Dairy, Food Additives Derived from Animals

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Five Recent Commission Regulations related to the regulation of crypto-assets

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Foodstuffs. The decision incorporates two Commission Regulations

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Ship Recycling Facilities

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : CO2 emissions and fuel consumption

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Social security

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Active substances used in plant protection products

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Harmonized indices of consumer prices and the house price index

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Variables Related to Digital Platform Employment

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options related to commodity risk

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Marine Equipment

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Taxonomy for the single electronic reporting format

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Active and Basic substances used in plant protection products

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Feed Additive Sepiolite

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Prohibited or Restricted Antimicrobials

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Recognition of control bodies for organic products

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Correcting Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2055

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Extends rules concerning the food additive cellulos

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :List of high-risk third countries

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Extends deferred application date for certain clearing obligations and risk management procedures for OTC derivative contracts

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Imports Of Animal and Animal Products

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Joint scientific consultations on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Inspections of slaughterhouses

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Emissions Trading System (ETS)

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Information to be notified to ship reporting systems

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee : Environmental regulations, particularly regarding ship recycling

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Concerning the use of calcidiol monohydrate in food supplements

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Detailed rules for calculating price differences between eligible aviation fuels and fossil kerosene Regulations will now also apply within the EEA, impacting aviation fuel suppliers and operators within the EEA countries.

Review of each of legal acts published today:

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/50 of 12 November 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1636 as regards the data of the documents exchanged in the context of movement of excise goods

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/103 of 15 January 2026 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of a preparation of Enterococcus lactis DSM 7134 as a feed additive for sows (holder of authorisation: Lactosan GmbH&Co.KG) and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1083/2014

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/104 of 8 December 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1200 as regards administrative and minor changes to the Union authorisation of the biocidal product family Airedale PAA product family

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/114 of 15 January 2026 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of fused alumina originating in the People’s Republic of China

Decision of the EEA Joint Committee :Detailed rules for calculating price differences between eligible aviation fuels and fossil kerosene
Regulations will now also apply within the EEA, impacting aviation fuel suppliers and operators within the EEA countries.