Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Ваш AI помічникНовий чат
    Open chat icon

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.Case T-643/22.

    This is a judgment by the General Court regarding restrictive measures imposed on Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, the former President of Ukraine. Yanukovych challenged the Council’s decisions and regulations that included and maintained his name on the list of individuals subject to sanctions for actions undermining Ukraine’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence. The court dismissed Yanukovych’s action, upholding the Council’s decisions to impose and maintain the restrictive measures against him.

    The judgment addresses Yanukovych’s challenge to several Council Decisions and Implementing Regulations from 2022 to 2024. These acts froze his funds and imposed restrictions on his entry into EU member states. The court examines the evidence presented by the Council to justify these measures, focusing on whether Yanukovych’s actions supported or implemented policies that threatened Ukraine’s integrity, sovereignty, and independence. The court assesses the reliability and credibility of the evidence, including press articles and official documents, and considers whether the Council made an error in its assessment.

    The court’s decision rests on the finding that the Council had a sufficiently solid factual basis to include and maintain Yanukovych’s name on the sanctions list. The court found that the Council was justified in its assessment that Yanukovych contributed to the destabilization of Ukraine through actions such as requesting military intervention by Russia, supporting pro-Russian politicians in Crimea, and voluntarily reducing Ukraine’s defense capacity. The court also considered his involvement in a Russian operation aimed at replacing the Ukrainian President. The court concludes that these actions provided sufficient grounds for the Council’s decisions, dismissing Yanukovych’s claims that the Council made an error of assessment. ****

    Full text by link

    E-mail
    Password
    Confirm Password
    Lexcovery
    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.