Analysis of the Draft Law:
Unfortunately, I cannot provide an analysis without the text of the draft law. Please try uploading the document again, and I will gladly help with the analysis as soon as I have access to its content.
Analysis of Other Documents:
Analysis of the Draft Law of Ukraine “On Ensuring Traceability of Aquatic Bioresources and Products Produced from Aquatic Bioresources”
1. Position of the Document Author
The author supports the draft law but expresses numerous comments regarding its concept and individual provisions. This demonstrates an intention to improve the draft law, making it more effective and consistent with the existing legislation of Ukraine.
2. Main Provisions of the Document
- Conceptual Remarks: The draft law lacks a clear definition of an independent subject of legal regulation, which can be addressed through amendments to existing laws.
- Legal Certainty: Insufficient clarity of certain terms and provisions, such as the definition of water bodies or traceability principles, may lead to legal conflicts.
- Electronic Traceability System: The draft law does not take into account all requirements for the electronic system defined by the Law of Ukraine “On Public Electronic Registers”.
- Transportation of Aquatic Bioresources: Proposed changes to the system of waybills may contradict existing legislation in the field of road transport.
- Privatization of Hydraulic Structures: Provisions on privatization in the draft law may conflict with national security and existing privatization laws.
This document is key to understanding the existing legislative framework regulating the traceability of aquatic bioresources. It provides an opportunity to improve the draft law to better correspond to national interests and international obligations of Ukraine.
