Here is the translation of the provided legal text:
1. The subject of the dispute was the recognition as invalid of the decision of the general meeting of members of the garage cooperative (AGC), which concerned the election of an authorized representative from one of the garage rows.
2. The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the previous instances, emphasizing that the courts must take into account the existence of a violated right or interest of the plaintiff and the effectiveness of the chosen method of protection; the court noted that the mere fact of violation of the procedure for holding the meeting is not a sufficient basis for declaring the decision invalid if it did not lead to a violation of the plaintiffs’ rights; the court found that the plaintiffs did not prove how the disputed decision violates their rights as members of the cooperative, since the dispute concerns the procedure for delegating an authorized representative from a row in which one of the plaintiffs does not have a garage; the court departed from the previous position, which emphasized the importance of observing the procedure for holding meetings.
3. The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the previous instances and dismissed the claim for recognition as invalid of the decision of the general meeting of members of the AGC.
