Subject of the dispute: Recovery of monetary funds in the amount of 95,900 US dollars, which were allegedly provided under a loan agreement.
Main arguments of the court: The court established that the receipts for receiving money do not contain a clear obligation to return the funds, but are actually documents about the transfer of corporate rights in the authorized capital of LLC “UKRA-IR”. Later, the plaintiff received three apartments in exchange for his corporate rights and signed a receipt about the absence of claims, which additionally confirms the absence of debt obligations.
Court decision: The Supreme Court left the plaintiff’s cassation appeal unsatisfied and supported the appellate court’s decision to refuse recovery of monetary funds.
