Here is the translation of the provided legal text:
1. **Subject of the Dispute:** The dispute arose regarding the recognition of ownership rights to inherited property (part of a house and a land plot) by the granddaughter of the deceased grandfather, who believed that her mother had actually accepted the inheritance after the death of her grandfather but had not оформлена (formalized) it.
2. **Main Arguments of the Court:** The court of appeal, considering the case again after the instructions of the Supreme Court, concluded that the plaintiff’s mother had indeed actually accepted the inheritance after the death of her father, as she lived with him at the time of his death and continued to use the inherited property. The court took into account certificates of the actual residence of the plaintiff’s mother with the testator, as well as the fact that she participated in the maintenance of the property. The court noted that the absence of registration of the place of residence is not an unconditional proof of the absence of the fact of residence, and the circumstances of the case confirm that the plaintiff’s mother entered into the management of the inherited property. The court also indicated that the minor plaintiff is considered to have accepted the inheritance after the death of her mother, as no statement of renunciation of the inheritance was filed. The court departed from the formal approach to the assessment of evidence of acceptance of the inheritance, focusing on the actual circumstances of the case and the actions of the heir, which indicated the intention to accept the inheritance and use it.
3. **Court Decision:** The court partially satisfied the claim, recognizing the plaintiff’s ownership of 1/8 of the house and 1/4 of the land plot, and also признав (declared) partially invalid the certificate of inheritance issued to another heir.
