Here is the translation:
Subject of Dispute: A serviceman challenges the inaction of the military unit regarding non-payment and improper calculation of monetary compensation for the period of service.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The court deviated from the previous practice of determining the term for appealing to the court, indicating that the term should be calculated from the moment the serviceman receives a document about the accrued amounts upon discharge.
2. The plaintiff did not receive monthly notifications about the amount of monetary compensation, which complicates determining the moment when he became aware of the violation of his rights.
3. The serviceman’s right to receive due payments is inalienable and does not depend on the previous calculation of funds by the employer.
Court Decision: The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of previous instances and sent the case for a new review, recognizing that the plaintiff did not miss the term for appealing to the court.
