Here is the translation:
1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging disciplinary penalties and dismissal of police officer PERSON_1 from the National Police bodies for violation of service discipline.
2. Main Arguments of the Court:
The Supreme Court deviated from previous judicial practice and established that:
– The obligation to report extraordinary events to management applies to police officers regardless of whether they are on duty;
– The mere fact of drawing up an administrative protocol against a police officer indicates improper performance of service discipline;
– Closure of administrative proceedings does not negate the existence of a disciplinary offense;
– A police officer’s behavior must meet high ethical standards both during service and outside of it.
The Court recognized disciplinary penalties as lawful due to:
– Refusal to undergo medical examination for intoxication
– Improper performance of official duties
– Aggressive behavior when communicating with colleagues
3. Court Decision: Completely denied satisfaction of PERSON_1’s claim, all disciplinary penalties and dismissal were recognized as lawful.
