Here is the translation:
Subject of Dispute: Recognition of the Communal Enterprise’s Unlawful Inaction Regarding the Maintenance of Civil Protection Shelters and Obligation to Bring Them into Proper Condition.
Main Arguments of the Court:
1. The Prosecutor filed a lawsuit on behalf of the State Emergency Service (SESU), however, the SESU body does not have an independent right to file such a claim.
2. Legislation does not empower the SESU with authority to apply to court with demands to bring protective structures to readiness.
3. Even under martial law, a state authority must act exclusively within the powers granted by law.
Court Decision: Return the prosecutor’s statement of claim, as there are no grounds for representing state interests.
Note: The court emphasized that even with recent legislative changes, the SESU has not acquired the right to file such lawsuits.
