Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Case No. 160/23553/23 dated 03/04/2025

Here is the translation of the legal analysis:

1. Subject of Dispute: Challenging a tax notification-decision on imposing penalties for late registration of tax invoices in 2022.

2. Main Arguments of the Court:
The Supreme Court confirmed the previous legal position that preferential norms on reduced penalties during martial law (introduced by Law No. 2876-IX) do not have retroactive effect. Namely, for tax invoices registered before February 8, 2023, the old, more severe penalty sanctions apply. The court detailed the temporal boundaries of the new norms: before martial law, the old rules were in effect, from 08.02.2023 – new “martial law” rules, and after the end of martial law, the old rules will return again.

3. Court Decision: Reject the taxpayer’s cassation appeal without satisfaction, thereby confirming the imposition of penalties at the old, higher rates.

Full text by link

Leave a comment

E-mail
Password
Confirm Password
Lexcovery
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.